880, Addition of a 300 s.f. closet , ApplicationI
VARIANCE
REOUEST FOR HEARING
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made
conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modem or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or
structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the
City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition
of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee.
WILLIAM AND JUDITH HASSOLDLT
PROPERTY OWNER:
OWNER'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.: —.JAIL:
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. M . B . 2 01- 2 9 - 3 5 ROLLING HILLS LOT NO 78
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 014 PARCEL 0 0 7
WYNN ENGINEERING INC
27315 VALLEY CENTER ROAD, VALLEY CENTER, CA 92082
AGENT'S NAME:
AGENT'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
10 PINE TREE LANE
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a
Variance.
THE PROJECT IS A 300 SQ FT, 10 x 30 WALK IN CLOSET.
A 61 SQ FT AREA OF THE CLOSET ENCROACHED INTO THE SETBACK.
AUG 0 4 2016
City of Rolling Hills
By
-12-
• •
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone.
SEE ATTACHED
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the
property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because
SEE ATTACHED
FILING FEE
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS.
-13-
RECEI'yj 07/28!2015 09:29 3103777288
ROLLING HIILS CITY
VARIANCE
REOUEST FOR HEARING
NOTE: According. to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Bills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are
required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to mod* or remove
any unauthorized Or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this
application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which
would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be
subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee.
ADDENDUM TO PREVIOUS VARIANCE APPLICATION
PROPERTY OWNER:
WILLIAM AND JUDITH HASSOLOT
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 10 PINE TREE LANE
TELEPHONE NO. 310 377-4114; EMAIL: hassoldt@earthlink.net
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 78-RI
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 014 PARCEL 007
AGENT'S NAME: Gary Wynn, Wynn Engineering
AGENT'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE
NO.:
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the
project require a Variance.
Request for a Variance from the requirement of Section 17.16.190(H) which
requires a 4'-wide walkway, that does not need to be paved, along the entire
perimeter of a structure. With the mostly completed addition encroaching into
RE
EWE
JUL 2 8 2015
City of Rolling Hills
By.
•
•
?LL y„y�t . S
11)-5,142- ... 114
ei.tui 04 t444,"--
wsri Vc4.ttA i'l
St 6/K,
RECEIVE410712912015 09:29 3103777298 4111 ROLLING HIILS CITY
the south side setback, and with an ascending slope several feet from the
addition, there is no room to provide a 4'wide access around a corner of the
addition. A minimum of 2' wide access is proposed.
1, Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the
same vicinity and zone.
The property is the most narrow lot in the vicinity and has the least
frontage of properties in the vicinity;
The property is the smallest lot in the vicinity;
A slope begins to ascend 2.5 feet from the addition's corner along an
RHCA easement line, and strict compliance with RHMC Section
17.16.190H would require cutting into the slope, resulting in additional
grading, RHCA approval and license agreement, and would cause the
construction to expand closer to neighboring property than the variance
would allow.
2. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor
injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where
property is located because
Only a small portion of the project would deviate from the
requirements of RHMC Section 17.16.190H i (a four -foot walkway exists
most of the addition; only 2' by 2' corner of the addition would not
comply);
The project is currently screened from the street;
The Fire Department is satisfied with the proposed access around the
structure;
The variance would allow construction to take place outside of the RHCA
easement and further away from neighboring property than strict
compliance would allow.
•
'DATE 8 - 2 -16 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
AREA AND
STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 36,484 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 36,484 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 3,629 sq.ft. 342 sq.ft. 3,971 sq.ft.
GARAGE 748 sq.ft. sq.ft. 748 sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL/SPA N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
POOL EQUIPMENT N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
GUEST HOUSE N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
CABANA N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE (dirt volume to be included '
in grading quantities) 412 sq.ft. sq.ft. r sq.ft. ut
RECREATION COURT N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. i' `G`c-`e
ATTACHED COVERED
PORCHES 175 sq.ft. sq.ft. 175 sq.ft. 11
ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE,
BREEZEWAYS N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
ATTACHED TRELLISES 58 sq.ft. sq.ft. 58 sq.ft.
*DETACHED STRUCTURES:
(circle all that applies)
SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, 23 9 sq.ft. sq.ft. 239
BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, N/A sq.ft. sq.ft.
ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. N/A sq.ft. sq.ft.
high and over 120 sq. ft. in area,
WATER FEATURES, ETC. N/A sq.ft. sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 229 sq.ft. sq.ft. 229
OTHER N/A sq.ft. sq.ft.
BASEMENT AREA N/A sq.ft. sq.ft.
(volume to be included in grading quantities)
DEPTH OF BASEMENT N/A
TOTAL STRUCTURES
STRUCTURAL COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURES
EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO
800 sq. ft. detached structures that
are not higher than 12 ft.
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE
5,490 sq.ft.
15.1 %
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
342 sq.ft. 5 i, sq.ft. 5%7C
0.9 % 16.0 %
5,370 sq.ft. 342
14.8 % 0.9
-14-
sq.ft.
5 12 (119
sq.ft. �7, v
15. %
ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S)
PAVED WALKS, PATIO
AREAS, COURTYARDS
POOL DECKING
OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS,
ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING
PADS
TOTAL FLATWORK
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE
% TOTAL COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE
Excl. the allowance of up to 5-800 sq. ft.
structures from previous page.
% TOTAL COVERAGE
TOTAL DISTURBED
AREA
% DISTURBED AREA
GRADING QUANTITY
(include future stable, corral and
access way; basement and all other
areas to be graded)
3,266 sq.ft.
1,277 sq.ft.
N/A sq.ft.
N/A sq.ft.
4,543 sq.ft.
12.5 %
10, 033sq.ft.
27.5 To
9,913 sq.ft.
27.2 %
25,880 sq.ft.
5
11$
0
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
342 sq.ft.
0.9 %
3,266 sq.ft.
1,277 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq. ft.
4,543 sq.ft.
12.5 %
10,375 sq.ft.
28.4 ova
342 sq.ft. 19 q.ft.(62 2 ? 3
0.9 % 28) % osc'g
sq.ft.
25,880 sq.ft.
(210 (X,
10.0 cubic yards
FOUNDATION SPOILS WILL BE USED TO BACKFILL
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
All structures (attached and detached) must be listed.
* Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue,
outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area
exceeds 800 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property.
-15-
• •
DATE 8-2-16 Z.C. NO. ADDRESS 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO.1
BTTTLDART,F, PAD AREA EXTSTTNG PR(P(-)MF.T) TOTAL
AND STR T TCTT TR F.S.
BUILDING PAD 15 , 710 „lit.
RESIDENCE 3,629 sq.ft.
GARAGE 748 sq.ft.
POOL/SPA sq.ft.
POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft.
CABANA/REC.RM sq.ft.
GUEST HOUSE sq.ft.
STABLE sq.ft.
SPORTS COURT sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 229 sq.ft.
0
342
0
0
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
15,710
3,971
748
229
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES
Primary residence 175 s,1,ft. 0 sq.ft. 175 sq.ft.
Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
PORCHES THAT EXCEED io% OF THE
SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE
ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/
BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
ATTACHED TRELLISES 58 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 5 8 sq.ft.
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 239 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 239 sq.ft.
(from 1s` page)
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 239 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 239 sq.ft.
(from 1st page not including allowed deductions)
OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 5, 078 sq ft. 342 sq.ft.5, 4 2 0sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 32.3 % 2.2 % 34.5 %
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 4,725 sq.ft. 342 sq ft 5, 0 6 7 sq ft.
Nor inn] attached trellises,
Not inrl allowed deductions,
and inrl the area of covered porches that
exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 30.1 2.1 32.2
%
-16-
• •
DATE 8 - 2 -16 Z.C. NO. ADDRESS 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO.2 NO PAD #2 PROPOSED
BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
AND STRUCTURES
BUILDING PAD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
RESIDENCE silt. sq.ft. sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
POOL EQUIPMENT gq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
CABANA/REC.RM sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES
Primary residence sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE
SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE
ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/
BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES
(from 1" page) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES
(from 1S`pa a not including allowed sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
deductions)
OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO.2 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO.2 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
Not incl attached trellises,
Nor inrL allowed deductions,
and inn the area of covered porches that
exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % % %
-17-
DATE 8-2-16
Z.C. NO.
• •
ADDRESS 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION
Grading Quantities: Cubic Yds. Max. Depth Max. Depth Location
CUT/EXCAVATION
For house/addition
For other structures (i.e. walls)
List
For driveway(s)
For yard areas
For basement excavation
For pool/spa excavation
Overexcavation
TOTAL CUT
TOTAL EXPORT
FILL
For house/addition
For other structures (i.e.walls)
List WALL BACKFILL
For driveway(s)
For yard areas
For basements
For basement wells
For pool/spa
Recompaction
TOTAL FILL
5.0
5.0
5 0
5.0
0
LANDSCAPE FILL IN BACK YARD
TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill)
Existing pad elevations
Finished floor
Finished grade
Proposed pad elevations
Finished floor
Finished grade
Basement -finished floor
Basement -finished well wall
10.0
PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS
Residential pad
600.0
599.33
600.0
599.33
N/A
N/A
Other pad
• •
DATE 8 - 2 -16 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ELEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN
SUBMITTED WITH PLANNING APPLICATION
PLANTING AREA
1. NEW AREA(S) TO BE LANDSCAPED
2. EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE ALTERED (RE -
LANDSCAPED)
3. TOTAL LANDSCAPING: NEW AND ALTERED AREAS
OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS
0
3,360
3,360
sq. ft
sq. ft
sq. ft.
4. CHECK OFF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS THAT MAY BE PROPOSED,
AND SHOW LOCATIONS ON PROJECT SITE PLAN:
WATER FEATURE: ❑
GARDEN WALL (less than 3-Ft tall) ❑
SITTING WALL / BENCH ❑
WALKWAY OR PATIO ❑
TRELLIS, CANOPY OR SIMILAR
STRUCTURE ❑
-19-
• •
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at 7L(1'/// ►-c i-i r) Ls , California,
this day of CJ By: ,/&..,00,,kLO\Adlei'±
(
By:
Address
City
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this
application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the
State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take
acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying
this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment
here.
APPLICANT: DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: FEE:
COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY:
ZONING CASE NO
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
COMPANY PHONE NO. (
PROJECT ADDRESS:
-20-
•
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and
separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by
the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its
admonition is completely derstood.
t /Cs
Executed at
this
day of Q U
, California
, 20 .
BYA/Zai—ALL4-4-&
By:
/ P/1»-e LuA
Addr ss
/z6(11 A4--f , c,(
City
-21-
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
) §§
AFFIDAVIT
I, . declare under penalty of perjury
that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as
they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance
of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
this
Executed at . California,
day of ,20
Signature
PUBLIC:Planning Forms in PDF format:Variance Application Rev. 2010
-22-
• •�
REQUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made
conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modem or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or
structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the
City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition
of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee.
PROPERTY OWNER: William & Judith Hassoldt
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 10 Pine Tree Lane
TELEPHONE NO:
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 15 Portuguese Bend Rd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. M.B. 201-29-35
ASSESSORS BOOK NO.
AGENT'S NAME:
AGENT'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
Wynn Engineering Inc.
EMAIL:
7569 PAGE
014
27315 Valley Center Rd, Valley Center CA 92082
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
PARCEL
007
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site
Plan Review:
The site plan review was triggered by a 300 square foot addition that was administratively approved by the
City & community association. The current owners recently acquired the property with one of the oldest, original
homes in Rolling Hills. In studying the existing structure, the owners's decided to repair and restore the dwelling
and add a closet onto the master beroom. Unfortunately, flawed site plans on file at the city were relied upon.
As the construction of the closet addition was nearing completion, a hostile neighbor complained about the
construction. A new survey revealed a 7.5 foot encroachment into the 20' sideyard setback. The owners stopped
work iri early 2015 and now filing this application at the request of the planning director. Several variances have
been reviewed and the City council has taken jurisdiction of the project. The current plan proposed,is,a,result
LF )
of numerous hearings and meetings with the city Planning Commission and City,Oduncil7 iming e i� rips,
staff requested that the building department approve the sunroom renovation & approx. 42 qgyarpAet of
floor area under the existing roof. -12-
City oforn
2ols
By C—itpafztolltngHills
•
• )
Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage
No new basement is proposed with the project.
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding.
Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
Being one of the older properties in Rolling Hills, the owner was interested in preserving as much of the historical
fabric as possible. This is one of the smalles properties in the zone. There are several existing non conforming
conditions with the existing barn encroaching in the 20' sideyard setback along the northerly property line. The
master bedroom closet addition encroaches into the southerly 20' side yard setback. Strong vegetation helps
soften these encroachments. There will be 10 cubic yards of grading to complete a retaining wall 4' away from the corner
of the master bedroom closet addition. The project is compatible with the zone as it is one of the original homes in RH.
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land
forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features.
The oroiect dos not significantly alter the native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses or hillsides. A7' retaining wall MkK
is proposed to replace an old PV Stone rubble wall that was removed during demolition in early 2015. The owners would
like to keep all mature trees, including the pine tree at the south boundary discussed by the City Council. Being a restoration
project by the current owners, the project will preserve natural features including the old house & other existing structures
on the property.
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and
recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and
contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow
unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization on lots.
iO yards of grading is proposed to construct a masonry wall where the PV Stone rubble wall previously existed. This
is grading to trim existing slopes and backfill for the new retaining wall. The drainage to the westerly side of the property
will not be impacted.
1* Note that the retaining wall is only 7' at one point and will be mostly under 5'
-13-
SPR Rev. 2015
City of Rolling Hills
• •_/
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should
provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
The owner wishes to preserve all the existing mature vegetation and landscaping on the property.
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage
permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot.
The structural lot coverage is 16% with 20% maximum allowed. The total lot coverage of structures and flatwork
is 28.1% with 35% allowed
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary
to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks
of neighboring properties.
The renovation of the existing dwelling is harmonious and in scale with the surrounding residences, even with the
small lot area. The setback issues have been discussed previously, overall the project seems to fit well in this
existing neighborhood. No exotic grading is proposed or required.
G. . Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and
vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and
other on -site parking or storage areas.
There is no change to the traffic generated by the restoration of the existing dwelling. There will be no adverse
impact to the circulation for pedestrians or vehicles.
-14-
SPR Rev. 2015
City of Rolling Hills
4
•
•
•
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain
how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
The site development plan does not violate CEQA. Even with the proposed variances on the south sideyard, the
project does not crowd adjoining properties. Mature landscaping can be utilized to enhance screening from neighboring
properties, if required
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the
facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
Date:
Signature
For:
Applicant
FILING FEE
AL -al
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
-15-
SPR Rev. 2015
City of Rolling Hills
SECTION E-E
AUG 0 3 1u 3
City or .
By
✓ N 599.82I
\',\\s '* / p0 ////]00//// 50.
N.\ 0L0557 rzom0N�
\ `� ` E . 99.{51 ��EyN2onPIUENT7 /4
•\ \. �03� -\ 599.39 / c—o�� 1aV e�Nw—�—
•610.17 6;0\ \ \ �\\ 58 — — —
N. E\ \ P�Ef�NNING �,,!.., _ — —60.5-
4— 07
r \ \
4 a
RETAINING WALL DETAIL
SCALE 1' • 5'
Si) •
a 09-02-2016
GW
8N8
Gv 15-035
P-3
OF 3 101, StiiE15
\
\
I \, \N \ \ \,------- s°i
1 \ \ 1 I
1 \ \ \I 1 I EXISTING BLOW OFF VOL
I \ 1 I
(� sso so. FT.,* coati. I I 1 DISTURBED AREA — — —
\1 \ - + �(0) POWER POIE \ — — _
l \ �$1`(..__- I I 539'35'20-E 273.44'
\ \ I IlX l Il�
i\I i --
\ I \I II, 4 .
ELTON? STABLi - 1 1 I
I
II \ II I 1 '9
\P\\\\
s\ \ \ \
Ls \
\ \ \ \
\ 5a L
\\ \\ \ \\ \/ NANO ea.5 1- \ I \
\ \\ \ I \ I 1 \
\'\ \\ \ 1 \ \ I \ 1 1
,2rPr::
\ 1 1 \
\\A \\\
I I ' ?? k \ y.
\ \
\ \\ \ E%ISTNC DIRT PA HWA II 1 1 ') 1& 9h \ \\
\\ \\\\ \ / I I\ 1 I ,t� I r fUf" J___ \
\ \\\\\\ J \ 1 • 1j049 I lti !/ I DE \
\ / IE%ISTNC ROOF LINE-J\�AE9 CE
\ \ \ \ \ \ I I • \ I' w I EXISTING GA2030 `VIIIIE/
`C \\\ \\ I, \ \\
\\ \\ \\ DI,INRB r, ARE�I �1-/BmL_Dw/g sETBA« LINE s — --�\ (�
\\\\\ 11 \ \\ \\ \ \ \` I I I / /I ( 10' CONMUNI ASSOCIATION EASEMENT
\ I \ I I ss9as zD-E 30492
\\\L \\ 1 1 I 1
I\ I \ \ 555- I I I
\1\ I \I I I I
iso5—
S132.50'20-E 40.00'
ISTING MAIWO
DISTURBED AREA
PROPOSED SURFACE DRAINAGE
r _ '=PROPOS4D RETAINING WALL- o-
I (/ / I/ ~ OF ENCROACHMENT —
NCR ACH EENTNCE
( CR : / / OVERHEAD POWER ONE — — -AREA SEE RETAINING WALL SECTION ON SHEET 3 de 3
/ /
III i" / / yyy��
1 l o a � 8� ' / /
IllYli I ( t %
USING WATER METER
Ii VICINITY MAP OWNER INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION PARCEL INFORMATION PROJECT INFORMATION
S� NAME WIWAM AND J1010 HASSOLDT NAME WD11AV DOD JUDHX HASSaDT 6g ATE ADDRESS R PCtNDLLSE BERG ROAD EMSRNE EXISTING 3,256 SO. FT, ANGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
k� kn_ 7 & 10 ONE TREE LANE AppiFSS 10 FINE TREE WE ROLLING MOS, G 902]4 PROPOSED: PROPOSED 300 SO. FT CLOSET ADCDa TO BE COSTING MASTER ®ROCY
f �IFA,� CITE ROLLING HILTS gTri. ROLLING HILLS
ASSESSOR'S O HO.:>369-014-00) PROPOSE] 42 SO. FT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM
STATE CALIFORNIA STATE CALFORNIA E%ISRNG 371 Sp FT AN ROOM
LEGOESCRIPRON: M.B. DOI-20-35
1!. AL SIP- WP4 ZIP. 902]4 ROLLING HILLS LOT NO. 78 BUEDING ENCROA0ORINT INTO SETBACK
PHONE 1-31,3))-4114 PHONE 1-310-37)-4114 LOT AREA: 40170E SO, FT, 61 SO. FT. OF R¢ CLOSET .IXTION ENCROACHES INTO THE BUILDING 4lB.K.
EMAIL EWSSOLOeerNlFtmt aHAR_ n®IitOe8200lt .e THE PROPOSED EA\E OVERHANG IS IC ANO ENCROACHES 35.6 SO. FT. INTO THE BUDDING SETBACN
-
MEM
PROPERTY WE
E/SNENT LINE
BUILDING SETBACK
ET LOT AREA
DISTURBED AREA
OSTNG TRAVELED ROADWAY
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 0/� vaiiaiiioi I
iai vrir/p.____�i iIiiiil
O 0
WYNN ENGINEERING. INC
DLLs voLvemr
W
f
W
Lyre 06-02-2016
BNB
3,0 P 1,039
ow: kv
P-1
IGF 3 10101 SVEEIV
/
• •
DATE 8-16-16 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
AREA AND
STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 36,484 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 36,484 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 3,629 sq.ft. 342 sq.ft. 3,971 sq.ft.
GARAGE 748 sq.ft. sq.ft. 748 sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL/SPA N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
POOL EQUIPMENT N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
GUEST HOUSE N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
CABANA N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE (dirt volume to be included
in grading quantities) 412 sq.ft. sq.ft. 4 5 0 sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
ATTACHED COVERED
PORCHES 175 sq.ft. sq.ft. 175 sq.ft.
ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE,
BREEZEWAYS N/A sq.ft. sq.ft.
ATTACHED TRELLISES 58 sq.ft. sq.ft. 58
*DETACHED STRUCTURES:
(circle all that applies)
SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, 239 sq.ft. sq.ft. 239 sq.ft
BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft—
ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft J
high and over 120 sq. ft. in area,
WATER FEATURES, ETC. N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.0
SERVICE YARD 229 sq.ft. sq.ft. 229 sq.fttuj1
OTHER N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.
BASEMENT AREA N/A sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
(volume to be included in grading quantities)
DEPTH OF BASEMENT N/A
sq.ft.
sq.
TOTAL STRUCTURES
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURES
EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO
800 sq. ft. detached structures that
are not higher than 12 ft.
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE
5,490 sq.ft.
15.1
5 , 370 sq.ft.
14.8 %
-14-
3 4 2 sq.ft.
0.9 %
342 sq.ft.
0.9 %
5,870 sq.ft.
16.0 70
5,750 sq.ft.
15.8 %
I)
• •
ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S)
PAVED WALKS, PATIO
AREAS, COURTYARDS
POOL DECKING
OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS,
ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING
PADS
TOTAL FLATWORK
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE
% TOTAL COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE
Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 800 sq. ft.
structures from previous page.
% TOTAL COVERAGE
TOTAL DISTURBED
AREA
% DISTURBED AREA
GRADING QUANTITY
(include future stable, corral and
access way; basement and all other
areas to be graded)
3,266 sq.ft.
1,277 sq.ft.
N/A sq.ft.
N/A sq.ft.
4,543 sq.ft.
12.5 %
10, 033sq.ft.
27.5 %
9,913 sq.ft.
27.2 %
25,880 sq.ft.
71.0
0
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
%
342 sq.ft.
0.9 %
342 sq.ft.
3,266 sq.ft.
1,277 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq. ft.
4,543 sq.ft.
12.5 %
10,375 sq.ft.
28.4 %
10,293sq.ft.
0.9 % 28.2
sq.ft.
25,880 sq.ft.
71.0
10.0 cubic yards
FOUNDATION SPOILS WILL BE USED TO BACKFILL
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
All structures (attached and detached) must be listed.
* Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue,
outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area
exceeds 800 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property.
-15-
DATE 8-16-16 Z.C. NO.
ADDRESS 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO.1
RTTTT.DART,E PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
AND STRTTCTTTRFS
BUILDING PAD 15, 710 sq ft. 0 sq.ft. 15,710 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 3,629 sq.ft. 342 cq.ft. 3,971 sq.ft.
GARAGE 748 cq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 7 4 8 sq.ft.
POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
CABANA/REC.RM cq.ft. cq.ft. sq.ft.
GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SPORTS COURT cq.ft. sq.ft. cq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 229 cq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 229 sq.ft.
ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES
Primary residence 175 5 sq.ft. 0 sq. ft. 175 cq.ft.
Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sr .ft.
AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED cq.ft. cq.ft. sq.ft.
PORCHES THAT EXCEED io% OF THE
SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE
ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/
BREEZEWAY cq.ft. sq.ft. cq.ft.
ATTACHED TRELLISES 58 sq.ft. 0 cq.ft. 58 cq.ft.
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 239 sq.ft. 0 sc .ft. 239 cq.ft.
(from 1s` page)
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 239 cq.ft. 0 cq.ft. 239 cq.ft.
(from ls`page not including allowed deductions)
OTHER sq.ft. cq.ft. sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 5, 0 7 8 sq.ft. 342
sq.ft. 5, 4 2 0cq ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 32.3 % 2.2 % 34.5 %
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 4, 725 sq.ft. 342 cq.ft. 5,067 sq.ft.
Not inrl attached trellises,
Not inel allowed deductions,
and inrl the area of covered porches that
exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 30.1 2.1 % 32.2
-16-
• •
DATE 8-16-16 Z.C. NO. ADDRESS 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION
Grading Ouantities: Cubic Yds. Max. Depth Max. Depth Location
CUT/EXCAVATION
For house / addition
For other structures (i.e. walls)
List
For driveway(s)
For yard areas
For basement excavation
For pool/spa excavation
Overexcavation
TOTAL CUT
TOTAL EXPORT
5.0
5.0
FILL
For house / addition
For other structures (i.e.walls)
List WALL BACKFILL 5.0
For driveway(s)
For yard areas
For basements
For basement wells
For pool/spa
Recompaction
TOTAL FILL
5.0
0
LANDSCAPE FILL IN BACK YARD
TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill)
10.0
PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS
Existing pad elevations Residential pad
Finished floor 600.0
Finished grade 599.33
Proposed pad elevations
Finished floor 600.0
Finished grade 599.33
Basement -finished floor N/A
Basement -finished well wall N/A
Other pad
•
cl‘o\voq 'Os
RECEIVED 07/28/2015 14:28 3103777288 ROLLING HIILS CITY
•
$gin
JUL282015
City of Rolling Hills
By
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at ,/6,47e
California,
this
By:
By:
day of 7r " .,"A1 r 4 2015
15Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Address
City
•
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used f this application is signed in
California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should
acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before
another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it)
owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this
application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate
acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE;
FEE:
COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT
NO:
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION
r,,, (Projects Approved by Resolution)
6'4R'y YM , certify, warrant and represent that the
r plans I prepared and which are submitted
concurrently herewith for IS. fy,r_,. r,,04
and
on which I have affixed my stamp conform in all material respects to Resolution No.
( / approving this project and all of the .conditions set forth therein and the City's
Building Code and zoning ordinance. I understand and acknowledge that failure of City officials,
employees and agents to identify discrepancies, inaccuracies or errors in the plans does not
exculpate me from responsibility for submitting plans that comply materially with the Resolution,
Building Code or zoning ordinance. I further understand and acknowledge that I may be subject to
administrative proceedings, penalties and/or fines should the submitted plans be inconsistent with
Resolution No. [I b 4 , the Building Code or zoning ordinance.
I (We) declare 'under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that the
information accompanying this application is true to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief.
NOTE: If this certification is signed outside of California, it must be acknowledged before a Notary
Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by
its laws. to take acknowledgements. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
Executed at
k i 1L, California, this t?/day of DCoemt Pao—, 20 1(0.
By:
By: 60141 Itk/Ai
W YAW g es, ) i/tr .
Company Name
2:7? I C1/414,61 (*A4.6.1.- h)4 •
Address
Vt((ey(reit, OA g2eg z.
City
�v-74�i—Thz2 G 1'
ar' �. �� tncc,
one & E-mail
)11i,
A' *p
• •
RollingHills Community Association
No. 1 Portuguese Bend Rd. Rolling Hills, CA 90276 City of Rolling dills
(310) 544-6222 (310) 544-6766Fax y
FEB 0 2015
APPLICATION FOR LICENSEAGREEMENT
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Date (012$ (I S Lot Tract
Property Owner Name 5 -1) 14 a o D 1 A N , JU Ce QFJ
Property Address 1 $ t `JR-eNC1V 11=NV RAD Rolling Hills
Contact Number -- . _
AGENT INFORMATION
Agent Name
Mailing Address
! (Individual *Ad Company Name)
Contact Number Email
By signing the following, I certify that I have received and read a copy of Resolution 192 and the
Association's Easement Policies and Guidelines and agree to comply with the Policies and
Guidelines, and any terms that may be included as a condition of granting the license. I understand
the License Agreement will be recorded; and the license will remain in effect if a transfer of title
occurs.
tare
Dat
Leo zili S
Please include the following with your completed application: This information will be
provided to the Board of Directors along with a copy of the application.
1. An 8-1/2" x 11" map with dimensions showing the area of the easement that you are
requesting a license to use. This map should include property lines, easement lines, any
roadways and a clear indication of the planting, irrigation or structure that encroaches
into the easement.
2. Any related documents to support your request. (i.e. photographs, additional letters,
detailed descriptions, etc.)
1. Easement Location: Please check all that apply.
Road Easement Includes a roadway
Trail Easement Includes a dedicated trail or commonly used undedicated trail.
Side Easement Eas ou . est Circle one
Rear Easement - North/East/South/West Circle one
06.23.15 Page 1 of 4
• •
Policy #8 of Easement Guidelines and Policies 2010 states in part, 'The Board of Directors , in certain
circumstances as contemplated by the Declarations of Restrictions, may grant a revocable license
agreement for encroachment into an easement or portion thereof, but is under no obligation to do
so. Accordingly, in evaluating an application for a revocable license for a new structure, object or
planting in an easement, after a site review, it will consider (in its sole and absolute discretion)
each of the following (i) the applicant's need (as opposed to merely a desire) for a particular
structure, object or planting, (ii) if such need can practically be met by locating the structure, object
or planting outside of such easement, and (iii) if the applicant 's need for such structure, object or
planting within the easement outweighs the current or future use of the relevant portion of the
easement for the purposes for which easements are established under the Declarations, in addition
to such other matters as it may deem relevant with respect to the request."
2. Description of Item in Easement: Example: Tree, hedge, other planting, driveway, fence, etc.
SEE A tsoicl4 Et)
3. Summary of Request (Attach additional sheets or a letter if needed)
3.1 What is your need (as opposed to desire) for requesting the license agreement?
A 1 Act Fo
3.2 Can this need be satisfied elsewhere on your property outside of the easement?
Sc% A't1ACtiltio
3.3 What effect, if any, does your need to utilize the easement property on a non-exclusive basis
have on the ability of RHCA to have access to and use the easement?
3b15-
3.5 Does the area provide open space between adjoining properties?
Yes
No
06.23.15 Page 2 of 4
• •
3.6 Do you agree that the license will include your obligation to maintain the area?
Yes ✓
No
3.7 Do you agree that failure to maintain the area may constitute grounds for the RHCA to revoke
the license? ✓
Yes
No
4. Are all the other easements on your property clear of structures and plantings? Check one
Yes L/
No
If no, please explain:
5. To your knowledge does the proposed use have any impact on geology, hydrology or does it
create an environmental risk ?
Yes
No 1/--
License Agreement Process:
1. Once the application is completed and received, the request will be placed on agenda for
a future Board of Directors meeting. Association Members will be notified of your
request and the matter will be posted in the Association or City mailings.
2. When the Board first reviews your request, they will schedule a field trip to the
property. No discussion or decisions will be made on the field trip. Property and
easement lines are required to be staked prior to the Board's field visit. If the
property is not properly marked the field trip will be cancelled and the application
will be removed from the meeting agenda.
3. The Board will visit the site and view the existing conditions. It is helpful to
have someone present who is familiar with the property to answer any questions that
arise.
4. After the field visit, the request will be placed on a Board agenda for discussion and a
decision. It is essential that the property owner or their agent be present to answer any
questions. The applicant should be prepared to present all facts the applicant wants the
Board to consider.
BOARD DECISIONS ARE FINAL THERE IS NO APPEAL.
5. The Board may impose conditions for approval of the application. The conditions shall
be given in writing to the applicant and the applicant must sign an agreement that he
understands and agrees to the conditions before a license agreement is prepared.
6. If the request is approved, a map with dimensions showing the encroachment as well as a
legal description of the area will need to be provided to the Association office.
R H C A legal counsel will then draw up the legal documents. The completed
unexecuted documents and invoice will then be mailed to you. These documents
06.23.15 Page 3 of 4
• •
must be signed and notarized and invoice be paid. (There is a notary available at our
office for no charge.) The documents will then be recorded by legal counsel.
7. The license agreement will provide that RHCA has the right to revoke the license if
RHCA has a need to use the easement.
8. The license agreement will provide that RHCA has the right to revoke the license if the
applicant fails to maintain the subject easement or any conditions of the agreement.
06.23.15 Page 4 of 4
r
October 29, 2015
Board of Directors
Rolling Hills Community Association
No. 1 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
RE: NUCCION EASEMENT LICENSCE REQUEST
Dear Board Members,
We are requesting an easement license for a fence at our property on 18 Portuguese Bend
Road. Our lot is unique in that was a subdivision and the resultant grading has not left a logical
placement for a fence outside of the given easements. Though our lot is as narrow as our our
neighbor at 15 Portuguese Bend Road, our side easement is two and a half times as large as
theirs. Unfortunately, we have had some imminent pet and personal safety concerns that make
placing a fence very important, and thereby necessitating this request.
1. Easement Location
North easement, between our property and 15 Portuguese Bend Road
2. Description of Item in Easement
Three -rail fence with appropriate wire reinforcement. The fence would be placed
approximately f' o'tie property line along the Northern border of our property.
3. Summary of Request
3.1
We need the fence in order to protect our pets and ourselves.
We have had numerous coyotes access our backyard. The path they take goes from the
bottom of the Blackwater Canyon trail, up the side easement between our property and 15
Portuguese Bend Road and then into our backyard. We have 4 cats and two older dogs, all of
whom are presently vulnerable. A fence along this easement would make it much more difficult
for coyotes to enter our property.
Our Golden Retriever was also poisoned recently. The toxin was radiator coolant. We
do not have any radiator coolant in our possession. A common mechanism for poisoning dogs
is to soak dog treats in radiator coolant, causing a painful death. We witnessed our dog on the
property of 15 Portuguese Bend Road 6 hours before he manifested symptoms. We have
attached a police report describing the incident. We need the fence to keep our animals on our
property and not allow them to access other, more hostile, properties.
• •
Finally, the home at 15 Portuguese Bend Road is non -owner occupied. The present
resident has been witnessed on our property for no reason. A fence would provide a barrier to
uninvited persons who presently have easy access to our home.
Given the above safety reasons, the need for a fence is obvious. The reason we need
to place the fence in the easement is primarily one of topography. Our lot was a subdivision and
much grading had to be done in order to create a building pad. The lot is much more narrow
than it is long and there are slopes both at our southern and northern borders. Placing the
fence five feet from the property line places the fence in the most logical position based on the
slope of the property, the present approved landscaping, and our septic tank. It would allow
access to our property on both sides of the fence. It would also give five feet of easement for
allowable access between properties. Combined with the easement required from our
neighbors at 15 Portuguese Bend, there should be no safety or access issue. The easement in
question is not a bridle trail and it is not used to access the Blackwater Canyon riding trail
because of the unfavorable topography.
3.2
We cannot place the fence any further away from the property line than we have
requested. Our driveway, approved landscaping, pool and the slope of our hill make it only
feasible to place the fence in the requested location.
3.3
There are no obvious deleterious effects on RHCA with our proposed fence. The
easement is not used as a bridle trail and there are no utilities in the easement. The utility pole
on our property will be removed within the next six months, so no outside entity would need to
access the easement.
The location would allow access on both sides of the fence. Our neighbor has much
shrubbery and overgrowth in the easement which presently obstructs the easement. We would
be willing to pay for the removal of any and all easement shrubbery, planting or trees in order to
improve access and safety if our request is granted.
We appreciate your consideration of our request. We are deeply concerned about the
safety of our pets and our children. Though a fence is only a small barrier, it is better than our
present situation. We would like to complete construction as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Steieb and Diana Nuccion
k .. 4AP try'
,�'?ha�ti�.� �.��°•.
•
Report Information
and
Victims' Bill of Rights
SerViCP
radtM°f..
N eSince .1850
Station
"*Us. CAC .
Report Number
I5-(Y-f►5 -n(c(-f'471r
Classification of Incident
/0/29/is
Date
Deputy's Name
JIM McDONNELL, SHERIFF
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
FEB 0 4 2016
City of Roiling Hills
By
•
Thursday, February4, 2016 12011 PM Pacific Standard Time
Subject: Council meeting variance
Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 12:30:19 PM Pacific Standard Time
From: Judith Hassoldt <hassoldt@earthlink.net>
To: Yolanta Schwartz <ys@cityofrh.net>
Yolanta
The Feb 22 meeting involving the variance for the addition at #15 PBR needs to be put forward until the fence on the property line issue with the
Nuccions is revisited.
The Nuccions filed a request for a license agreement to remove the 70 year old wire fence.and replace it with a three rail fence.
The the reason they gave was to secure their property from the Hassoldts.
They swore under oath that they were afraid and we were hostel and threatening.
They also swore under oath that Judith Hassoldt had poisoned theirs dogs . They actually explained in detail.she used radiator fluid.
This accusation was used to intimate and punish me for not topping the trees to give them a view.
Neighborhood calls quickly alerted us to this action which was posted at the front desk of the association.
William called the association and Kathryn Bishop forwarded a copy of the application to him.
At a later time William called and spoke to Kristen Raig and she informed him the application and information
had been shredded.
The Nuccions were using the City and the association to malign our name and to intimidate me to cut the trees.
The association wants the wire fence removed as part of the approval for the wall to be constructed in the easement.
Also the pine tree which is clearly on our property as shown by the survey is to be removed even though two arborist
have declared it to be safe.
Judith Hassoldt
[,7 1,1 \\\ FL IL)
FEB 0 II 2016
City of Rolling Hills
By
FED ye 2016
City ); :..;ding Hills
By
Page 1 of 1