55, Reduce setback from 30 ft to 2, Resolutions & Approval Conditions1 BEFORE THE`PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
2
3
4
5
6
7'
8
9
10
11
12
13'
14
15.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29' II.
30 That no person appeared at said public hearing in
32
opposition to the application for a variance and that no
32
evidence was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE ADF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application )
of )
CLYDE A. KINZEY )
Lot 2, Southfield Tract, RS 59, 8-10)
ZONING CASE NO. 55
FINDINGS AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Clyde A. Kinzey, Lot 2, Southfield
Tract, for a front yard variance, came on for hearing on the
twenty-second day of June, 1965,'at the 'hour ,of 8:00 P.M., at
the City Hall of the City of, Rolling Hills, California, and
the applicant having submitted evidence in support of his
application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes
its Findings and Formal Report as required by the ordinances
of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Clyde A.
Kinzey, is the owner of that certain real propertydescribed
as Lot 2, Southfield Tract, located in the City of Rolling
Hills, California, and that notice of the public hearing in
connection with said application was given as required by
Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of
Rolling Hills, California.'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
.30
31
32
III.
The Commission further finds that the proposed
residence of the applicant is to be located twenty-five (25)
feet from the front road easement line of said lot instead
of thirty (30) feet as required by said Zoning. Ordinance,
and further finds that by reason of the terrain of said Lot 2-SF
the variance should be granted to applicant in order to preserve
substantial property rights possessed by other property in the
same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such variance
will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and zone
in which applicant's property is located, and there are ex-
ceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions by
reason of physical location and terrain of said Lot 2-SF which
do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity
and zone.
Iv .
From theforegoing it is concluded that a variance
should be granted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rolling Hills to Clyde A. Kinzey of Lot 2 of Southfield Tract
in accordance with the Plot Plan marked Exhibit I on file in
these proceedings, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
Dated: June 28, 1965.
Secreta', Planning Commission
-2-
Chairman, Planning C°Lundssion