none, Soils & geology investigation, Application•
REQUEST
PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS
r_
Preliminary review of proposed Lot Line Adjustment received March 17, 1999, for Mr. and Mrs. David
Parker, 86 Saddleback Road (Lot 73-D-RH) from Mr. Douglas McHattie, Bolton Engineering.
1. Owners of landlocked property would like to realign lot lines with three (3) other property owners
so as to add acreage to their property to permit a more curved driveway and separate access to
Saddleback Road that requires grading on all four (4) properties.
2. Proposed Lot Line Adjustments affect the following four properties:
Lot 73-D-RH - Parker, 86 Saddleback Road
Lot 73-A-RH - Derman, 88 Saddleback Road
Lot 67-RH — Heindl, 80 Saddleback Road
City Lot - Hesse's Gap — City of Rolling Hills
3. The existing access driveway to the Parker residence off Saddleback Road to the south is
through easements between the Derman and Heindl properties off Saddleback Road. The same
accessway off Saddleback Road also serves a driveway that branches to the southeast to the
Heindl residence.
4. The existing driveway is 15' wide with a retaining wall at the east side of the driveway that is no
higher than 18". The existing driveway has a 27.7% slope.
PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
1. The City of Rolling Hills will lose approximately 3,752 square feet of City parkland. How will the
City of Rolling Hills benefit from this lot line adjustment?
2. Have you thought about adjusting the proposed lot line adjoining the City property that a
congruent piece of property can be exchanged for the proposed loss?
3. What is the proposed gross and net lot areas of each of the proposed properties? Show on plan.
Will any property be less than 1 acre net?
4. What is the proposed amount of cut and fill grading on each of the adjusted 4 properties? How
can cut and fill be balanced on each lot?
5. The new frontage for the proposed Parker property off Saddleback Road will be 32 feet and is
currently non-existent. The Subdivision Code requires 150' frontage and will require modification
[Section 16.16.040, (Width and Depth of Lots)].
6. The proposed Parker lot design will create an irregular flag lot with less than a 150-foot minimum
width between side lot lines. (Section 16.16.040). New flag lot designs are discouraged. (Note
that for net lot calculation, the access strip area of a flag lot is also excluded from the gross lot).
• •
7. The proposed new 26-foot wide driveway access for the Heindl property that will be16 feet east of
the Parker driveway from Saddleback Road will require Traffic Commission review as well as
Planning Commission review.
143. The proposed distance between the existing and proposed Parker driveway access and the
proposed Heindl driveway access will be 16' to the east. 7T4le Zeni,�y3��1.
9. Will there be more than one driveway accessway to Saddleback Road on any of the newly
adjusted properties? Where?
If so, a Conditional Use Permit will be required for any property proposing a second driveway.
10. The proposed width of new Parker driveway will vary from 12 to 18 feet in width. Show the slope
of the existing and proposed driveways on plans?
11. Show whether the existing driveway is to be removed. How will that area be repaired?
12. How much of the front yard will be paved? What is the percentage of front yard covered by
pavement?
13. How high and long will the retaining wall at east side of new driveway be? Show height and
length.
14. How high and long will the retaining wall at north side of parking area be? Show height and
length.
15. Are there permits for the retaining walls east of the residence that extend 30 feet into existing City
property?
Show the height and length of those retaining walls?
16. Will there be any proposed additions to the existing residence?
Where? How many square feet?
CONCLUSIONS:
Required applications and fees:
I Lot Line Adjustment
I Site Plan Review for grading
Traffic Commission Review for Heindl new driveway access
FTOTAL
Environmental Review
$ !,500.00
!,500.00
300.00
200.00
$ 3,500.00
Provide proof of agreement of proposed adjustment by all affected property owners with applications.
Planning requires 2 separate Vicinity Maps drawn to scale, one showing existing and one showing all
proposed lot lines, easements, structures, driveways, and grading on all 4 lots. All 4 lots shall be
depicted in their entirety.
All plot plans require licensed civil engineer or surveyor stamp.
3/25/99
645
___
7
r
1
I
1V
c
POW
1
544'AC-
66
579Ac
ft
f , ,fie It-
r�� 1
! z lab K g ern
Potgef
0
O1 A
11
9 cc: At
00k
$117+14\
*4
4 \�
.t 3 A \\
\\
?'�
!04 A4. , \\
.
-00
DRIVE Noon
VIP
St
•
olo
t
t
u
•