631, Construct barn in front yard, Applicationit
•City 0/ „AIL
PROPERTY OWNER:
OWNER'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
VARIANCE
REOUEST FOR HEARING
/CA/ Al i /) / /t_ /,) D L
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
40 S,e71)T4 CAL/,I4, R,/? C4, 9027G
(3/0) 377 - /6/4
D Sr) DOLE /. 3 /? C/<
LOT NO. 6 7 vGLin)G, /-/CGS i .Pgcf
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO.7g6 9 PAGE .00 6 PARCELOC S
AGENTS NAME:
AGENTS ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
/,ULTvn) E9C,/^)CEA2/A)C7
707 S.,-/. E, 902 74
(3/0) 54.4 - 6 0 / o
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project
require a Variance.
/34) RA) L o c, ice' D /n) 7 -/G-` .c)R6/0 i SJA2 D
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same
vicinity and zone.
l-/E 5 rA/3LL' /S GUc'4,7 D /A) SCJCam/ LoG
SPo r on) P/P7/'L /2 J ��%i i /z. G EA?4/3Le
A co2,4L 61,12 P/13/1)& R/n)c, To /RC
CUN5 i;e C �",O,
®Pri^t^d c^ MacycI^d Paper.
• •
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the
property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because
is--) / S S c1 L.G1 %2 C7 L
FILING FEE
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS.
• •
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at "COLO?
this g7,89 1q day of%CrcGt. ��
By: �� r a k, leof.dI
By:
Address
, California,
. 20 QJ
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If
this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary
Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized
by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that
the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and
belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: RE t4A-TA 14 latrrD L_ DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE:T) ovc, M `►-1 A 7 T tE_ FEE:
COMPANY NAME: Poo LT Ora Et) C-r t ri ESP- t tC1 RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY:
? 0 7 5 /e VtQ 5/Dux? QO ZONING CASE NO:
ROLL -WO? l /iLI CS 7-A i G5 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
COMPANY PHONE NO. (3/01 G44- (nO t p
PROJECT ADDRESS: 60 S rA n ("LC fa n c K RD
C� c� LL.tt3C-r 1-t ILLS
•
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
PROPERTY OWNER: /A2/7L_
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 4 O S)1,12 Z C,<) l/_CZ//J,4-
TELEPHONE NO: 0/J) . 3 7 7 - /'i /4
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: F3 0 5A /7/)L /_ /� �C.� ,Q/)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 6 7 K QGC.i��%li
ASSESSORS BOOK NO.766 9 PAGE CO 5 PARCEL Do1J
AGENT'S NAME: T�D L /, 6`,49//» ,
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 70 7 /G//6-.P $ I /2 f-/E 96 Z 7z/-
TELEPHONE NO: (/3/9) S4-4 — Ga 0 / t�
65-1 /I 0 T G7—PIf
)
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan
Review:
.3,0,2A) , OcJ//74 C7/2n0/A2L:
Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage:
• •
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding.
Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
L o 7— /5 /`c%/ /3/ 6 t!a ER ZW#A) 44 5f.T fQo c)rt)1') l tJC1
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land
forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features.
"7Q,Qc C cn) 7-4.Q 5L vr�iA16 ' x?- /- 5 A-w6- n.QOPvs Eo
-rD l3C U5C/O /A) •W. LO/'t ,✓r ,,
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading
and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be
rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect
drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading
and proposed minimization on lots. •
SEc /-743OVC- ) /i)a o ?' /A24A2/LL �u
A r--'/= CC i2-//5 /5 A kA)O_ G
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should
provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
/ , ? TO A QE. 7 O ,4
/2c-, £XT67/) % 2/0/.0 O,' V c t l7 i J O9e.
PGA ,) i //✓C7 d f.H ' Gf2w/� L /�
SL OES rat R G UU,xI pc). ,ems M'&ni7-6 .
• •
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage
permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots.
£/6 7/N& NO J 5 7-0 %SON»/n> - _LO/i 1e1C//
i , 4-t) mot%/ •,e-/ 0,R /A2C7 /.e20G-Az 7 �d.5'"
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where
necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the
existing setbacks of neighboring properties,
420 CCALCL/C7- /3EC15 OA- i/,/E S/2E
4/= % /G. i95/Q i ci
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians
and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data,
landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas.
O C / A,' '
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act?
Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
• •
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Date: 3-Z6-01
Signatu
For: REA2/1- <7 //E/A)DL.
Applicant
.,(!7,..=0--
•e•%.~
• •• •• ••�
•
II ,Js
BUILDING BUILDING AREAS
s ED
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
EXISTING
NET LOT AREA 270, 08 o sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD(S) 2V28 O sq•ft.
RESIDENCE 3200 sq.ft.
GARAGE _..
SWIMMING POOLS' PA
STABLE
RECREATION COURT
I ?
7 9 2_ sq.ft.
sq.ft.
3 a t) sq.ft.
aq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 9 G, sq.ft..
OTHER —' sq.ft. '
NEW BASEMENT AREA
• (volume to be Included in grading quantities.)
•
TOTAL STRUCTURES
% STRUCTURAL
COVERAGE
% TOTAL PAD
COVERAGE
DRIVEWAY
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS
POOL DECKING
TOTAL FLATWORK
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
43 S 6 sq.ft.
t.62 %
18,5 %
8 3 2 0 sq.ft.
7 0 5 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
902.6
aq,ft,
3, 34%
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK
COVERAGE t 3 4. 13 sq.ft.
%TOTAL COVERAGE 4.97 %
PROPOSED
sq.ft.
6, 8 0_ sq.ft
sq.ft.
sq.&
aq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft•
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
KO.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
96
TOTAL
270.080 sq.ft.
32 b0 .'sq.ft.
B L O O sq.ft.
221m sq.ft.
— sq.ft.
26 6 4_ sq.&
sq.ft.
9 6 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
,7 Z sq.ft.
%
8320 sq.ft.
7 o s aq.ft.
sq.ft.
90 26 sq.ft.
3.34,
15,777 sq.ft.
5.8 %
sq.ft.
RiG.T t...o r t=:)'gv-vRCbAAGE 17.6 `/
C
CALCULATION
BUILDING AREAS EXISTING
S
NET LOT AREA
270.080 sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD(S) 23)6 8 0 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
SWIMMING POOL/SPA
STABLE
RECREATION COURT
SERVICE YARD
OTHER
32.00 sq.ft.
7 9 2. sq.ft.
sq.ft.
300 sq.ft
sq.ft.
to sq.ft..
sq.ft. .
NEW BASEMENT AREA
(volume to be included in lsdini quantities.)
TOTAL STRUCTURES 43 se sq.ft.
% STRUCTURAL 1. 62 %
COVERAGE
%TOTAL PAD
COVERAGE ''•
DRIVEWAY
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS
POOL DECKING G .
TOTAL FLATWORK
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
832.0 sq,ft.
70 5 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
9 0 2 5 sq.ft.
3.34%
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK
COVERAGE 134413 sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE 419 7 %
•
OF LOT COVERAGE
PROPOSED TOTAL
sq.ft. 2.70.080 sq.ft
35.28Osq.ft.
82.00 sq.ft.
1116o00 sq.ft
sq.ft
sq.ft. '19 2 sq.R
sq.ft. sq.ft.
sq.ft. $4ra (o sq.ft.
sq.ft sq.ft.
sq.ft. 9 G sq.ft.
sq.ft. — sq.ft.
aq.ft.
7644 sq.ft.
2.?9 %
96 2.1,4 %
sq.ft
83 2.0 sq.ft
70S sq.ft.
sq.ft. 90 26 sq.ft.
3.34%
sq.ft.
96
•140,52fr$- sq.ft.
Cm .I %
� T L. o—r s2.cb g 1 7.5 0
•
*"%c
.1n
tit
N�
V 0 01
775.
oo
it;
Date: March 15. 2001
Scale:
1•=20'
Drawn: DKM
Checked: RNB
Job:
Sheet
0208
l
Of 1 Sheets
City.
/ RO lLllG • g ii'!!
'i L� O fling INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
T
•, V
Date Filed
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
Zoning Case No.
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant(s) /--'C/A/.7 L Tel. ( 3/0 ) 3 77--/' /'%
Address 4-0 SAA27 lA74L/,!-F Cr7 9 e 2 7
2. Legal Owner(s) A 'S , ' (.7//L Tel. ( )
Address
3. Project Address O . 4/7/)L Alf/( P/7
Assessor's Book No. 75 (., - U 0 - 60 E3 Lot No. ,� 7
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
c, 4 , Co ()NW rf/2r� s� . 54TG;
5. Existing zoning district
6. Proposed project/use of site XA IOU)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size 7,1(4cre.s
8. Net lot area 270O/?Os4 "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of
the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement
plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement;
(b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or
driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag
lot.
9. Total square footage of structures — 4- 0 F,
10. Number of floors of construction d 1.\
11. Basement square footage til 0 t17.-
I-1
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
Printed on.Recvcled
•
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 13) I 1
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? A) 0
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof?
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added?
17. Driveway Access and Parking:
a Is a new driveway accessway proposed? NO (Requires Traffic Commission Review).
b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? D4/6-- Proposed? /✓D,S)�
(Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission).
c. • Width of driveway(s) Existing? / 1 Proposed? •
(Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission).
d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%?
(Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). ,�
Existing? 3 %� Proposed?
e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? / 2 �Zfyrii,e Proposed?
(Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commissio
f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet
current driveway access requirements? ,j.n
Explain
g. Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is
located? N D
Explain
h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in
which it is located? NO
Explain
i. Does vehi ular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or
less? IC5 Stable and corral average vehicular access slope•
j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of
2 cars? With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? 3
18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut 11 t 0 . Amount fill I '7 1 .
(Include any basement cut In grading quantities).
19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance),
any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces
will remain or are proposed to be added.
Square feet 4.7. 120 . Percentage of Net Lot Area 1 7. 5 .
20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 3 2 O Q
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-2
• •
21. tf commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented,
square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
NA-
22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
A
23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
/V, A-
24. Attach plans.
25. Proposed scheduling.
26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state
this and indicate clearly why the application is required.
.g/ PLf4n ,ec- ,QCD - C-7)PA D ()6-7
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
Cr7/ J t5LOP,A2, LO( -/ I /—)A? /k/.57242
//0 /1 � � ,Q4 /9/2 1//- (_,;A
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-3
• •
28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid
photos will be accepted.
57 (J,Q�U/), z //1%l7 /. S /7/7 z ,Q6.�//2,c-ilj%/,9Gi
17hr/ri G E / 4/'i/4 � Dic%< !�r's��,���>rr Of .� Z
/.r )/ ?. / /?47 /2/1/S 4,t/d)
4/D (}A)O5 J,4z 1,r2/7/i
i 22
29. Is the proposed project consistent with:
City of Rolling Hills General Plan
Applicable Specific Plan
City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance
South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
Congestion Management Plan
Regional Comprehensive Plan
30. Have any of the following studies been submitted?
_ Geology Report
_ Hydrology Report
_ Soils Report
_ Traffic Study
_ Noise Study
_ Biological Study
Native Vegetation
Preservation Plan
Solid Waste Generation Report
_ Public Services/
Infrastructure Report
1-4
Ye
No
Historical Report
Archaeological Report
Paleontological Study
Line of Sight Exhibits
Visual Analysis
Slope Map
Fiscal Impact Analysis
Air Quality Report
Hazardous Materials/
Waste
N/A
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
Issues:
L. AESTHETICS — Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 0 0
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 0 0 X
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which 0 0 0
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
IL AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 0 0 �(
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ ❑ 0
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a 0 0 0Y21-
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment 0 0 0
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
11. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
0 0 ❑
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-6
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
0
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of 0
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non -attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
Lif. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project::
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
0
0
b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 0
or other sensitive natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c)
d)
Have a substantial adverse effect on federally 0
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
o
0
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-7
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 0 0
of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the
State CEQA Guidelines?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the 0 ❑ 0
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 0 0
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 0 0 I
outside of formal cemeteries? / `
V!, GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated 0 0 0
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 ❑ 0
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ 0 0
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? ❑ 0 0
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 0
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, 0 0 0
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off -site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 0 0 II
1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating /
substantial risks to life and property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the ❑ 0 0
use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
I-8
ill. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area/
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
g)
otentiany:
;Significant:.
Impact:::.
?:::: Less Than
signficantWRh
Mitigation
Incorporation
less Than` >;
Significant
:Impact
Impact
❑ ❑ ❑ x
❑ ❑ ❑ x
❑ ❑ ❑ o
❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑ 0 X
❑ 0 ❑
❑ 0 0 Pi
❑ 0 0 761
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-9
. .................... .
`Less Than .:
Potential 6ignficarit Wtti:<::.: Less<Ttian:;:. '.
5igriificant ..::::. ;<.SigniBcant:::
•Mitigation..:.....::.. , JVo
Impact .: Impact• Impact:"
• IncOrporatibtT :.:; >::' :..:•
V�. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
--Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 ❑ 0
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 0 0
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able
level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed
the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
❑ ❑ ❑ Pr
❑ ❑ ❑ PI
❑ 0 0 Pf
❑ ❑ ❑ P
❑ ❑ ❑
sr-
❑ ❑ ❑ X
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-10
JX LAND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
Less Than
Potentially Significant With Less Than
Sgriificarrt_ Mitigation.....'.: Significant
Impact .:Incorporatio:
El
0
Impact
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or 0 0 0 �I
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 0 0
natural community conservation plan?
MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral 0 ❑ ❑[
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important 0 0 0
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
xJ. ,NOISE — Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 0
excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 0
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ❑ ❑ 0 P
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 ❑ ❑IS
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ 0 0
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ❑ ❑ 0 774
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
P°tentiallY Significant With" Less. 'Than ; ...
Significant;:; Mitigation '_.:`:':::Significant
Impact IncorpOratiorr :. :';. Impact
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 0
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ❑ 0 0
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ❑
0
0 0
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
XIV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
❑ ❑ ❑ I
❑ ❑ ❑ /�
❑ 0 ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ 0 0
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-12
L. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the
project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in 0 ❑ 0
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections?
b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 I
service standard established by the county /
congestion management agency for designated
roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 0
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 0 0 0
(e.g., sharp curves or darigerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0Pi
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 ❑
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Item XVI. yILLITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS —
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0
applicable Regional Water Control Board? `
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ 0 ❑l
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of j
existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater 0 0 0
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,
the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 0 0
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-13
•
Potentially
significant
Impact;:;:
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the provider's
• existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity 0
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal
needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects and the
effects of probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
El
Less Than
.Significant with Less Than
•Signifir nt
Incorporation:>'.
❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ 0 0
❑ ❑ ❑
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-14
•
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby
certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on
these lists.
Date / / V 6b 2000 t C1-��-r - „/ r 7��
Signature/
For 7-/1 //L: /A) 0 L
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date / / 2 ' in) 2 004
For
%/� /1E4/,L
Applicant
1-16
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form