426, Add 3608 sq ft to existing 160, ApplicationThe undersigned
RF. UEST FOR HEARING
FOR ZONE VARIANCE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Jay Stasack / Archint Associates
Name
4137 W. 7th. Street. Long Beach. CA 90804 (213)434-5100
Street Address Telephone Number
(1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are in lawful possession of
(2) has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at
58 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Street Address
Lot Tract
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the
project require a Variance.
1) A small section of the existing garage is currently over the setback line.
This part of the project will require a variance, as we propose to convert the
area to habitable space.
2) The existingstack room. located at Eastern portion of the let, is over tb . et -
back line; North Eastern portion is nroncsed for habitable use. this requires a
variance to maintain proposed use.
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the
'same vicinity and zone.
The natural terrain of the site calls for a certain architectural response. The
existing structures for which we request variance respond to the site's topography.
Additionally, they are in sound structural standing. Our proposed development of
the structures conforms to all applicable building criteria.
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to
'iv- property or improvements in such vicinity and pre,arty.is lc.atcd because.
The proposed development does not in any way influence anything in the vicinity. An
approval of these variances will allow us to complete development with minimum
disturbance to the site.
FILING FEE
A filing fee dOMPMNROO.must accompany the application. Make check payable to:
• •
COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE
CITY CC ROLLING RILLS
LOT COVERAGE (Ordinance No. 188)
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools,
service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 200 square
feet for the construction of a stable (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover
more than twenty (20%) percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition
to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking
space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting
roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more
than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area.
For the purposes of this Section •net a: la' shall exclude all perimeter easements
a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used
.or roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which pro-
vides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion
of any flag lot.
'BUI'.DING AREA CALCULATIONS
NET LOT AREA - - -38,954 _ sq. ft.-
RESIDENCE • -. - _ - 5,208 sq. ft. -•
GARAGE_ 840 sq. ft.
SWIMMING POOL 388' • sq. ft.
STABLE 400 sq. ft. _
_ TENNIS COURT'.. _ sq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 7,356
% COVERED (MAY NOT EXCEED 20% OF NET LOT AREA) 18.8 1
DRIVEWAY 2,944 sq. ft.
PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA 2,152 sq. ft.
POOL DECKING sq. ft.
TOTAL COVERAGE (MAY NOT EXCEED 35% OF NET LOT AREA)
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 5,096
• 13.1
31.9%
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I, (We), declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at
Cep] 1 1� 1 l..L,S • . California.
this ? r7 day of L,,i , , 199()
j::#
�
Address
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in
California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant
should acknowledge before a Not:ry Public of the State where the signature is
ffixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take .
acknowledgments, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the
information in the accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its)
knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
•
FORMS ISSUED TO: .. - _ -
NAME 444— FILED V it, . _1910
ORGANIZATION PEE 6 Z, ?-SV,-
. ... .... . • JCR ADDRESS AkCEIPT to.- -OIL
. . '/p
L
BT N M
DATE. BY
DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION .
The action of the Planning Commission will be final unless within twenty (20) days
following the notice to the applicant of the decision, an appeal in writing is filed
with the City Clerk by:
A. The applicant;
B.
Any person who protested, either orally or in writing, as a matter of record
prior to the final vote of the Planniuy Commission on the matter and who, in
addition, received or was entitled to receive the written notice specified
in subdivision 2 of subsection A of Section 17.40.060; or
C. The City Council, upon the affirmative.vote of three members of the Council.
In order to obtain a building permit, it will be necessary for the applicant to sign
a copy of the findings that they understand and accept the conditons of approval.
CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL (con't)
17. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot
that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous
portion of the lot within the area defined by the required
minimum setbacks that has an average slope of ten (10%) percent
or less. If there is not existing building pad, the buildable
area shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks
that has an average slope of ten (10%) of less.
COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
LOT COVERAGE (Title 17)
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts,
swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an
area of not less than 200 square feet for the construction of a stable
(with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%)
percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition to the
above described improvements, the areas included within driveways,
parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of
any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills.Community
Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the
net lot area.,
For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all
perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the
lot or parcel of land which'is used for roadway purposes, and shall also
exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress and egress
to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag
lot.
BUILDING AREA
CALCULATIONS
EXISTING
PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 38,954 sq. ft. 38,954 sq. ft. 38,954 sq. ft.
RESIDENCE 1,600 sq. ft. 5,208 sq. ft. 5,208 sq. ft.
GARAGE ' , 480 sq. ft. 840 sq. ft. 840 sq. ft.
SWIMMING POOL - sq. ft. 388 sq. ft. 388 sq. ft.
STABLE 840 sq. ft. 400 sq. ft. 400 sq• ft.
TENNIS COURT sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft.
SERVICE YARD sq. ft. 200 sq. ft. 200 sq. ft.
OTHER (Covered Patio) sq. ft. 320 sq. ft. 320 sq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 2.920 7.356 7,356
% STRUCTURE COVERAGE 7.5 % ' 18.8 % 18.8 %
DRIVEWAY 1,948 sq. ft. 2,944 sq. ft. 2,944 sq. ft.
PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREZZ40sq. ft. 2,152 sq. ft. 2,152 sq. ft.
POOL DECKING sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 2.288 5.096 5.096
%FLATWORK COVERAGE 5 % 13.1 % ' 13.1 %
%TOTAL COVERAGE 12.5 % 31.9 % 31.9 %
4
•
r
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The
undersigned ARCHINT ASSOCIATES (J. STASACK)
Name
4137 E. Seventh Street. Long Beach. CA 90804 (2131434-5300
Street Address Telephone No.
(1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are lawful possession of
[(2)] has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at
Lot Tract
58 Fastfield. Drive
Street Address
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what
aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review.
Add 3.608 sa.ft. to existing 1.600 sa.ft. single family house.
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must
make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's
conformance to the below criteria:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the zoning
ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to sizes,
set -backs and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
The proposed Project is compatible in size and set -backs and characteristics
of neighboring houses except the existing garage and tackroom with in set-
back lines.
B. Does the project preserve and integrate into the site design,
to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features
of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees,
drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)?
Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural
features.
Tha mainrity of site area is being preserved in its natural shape. The
levels of the house are being changed in concert with the contours as much
as possible.
5
C. Does the site development plan follow natural contours of the
site to minimize grading; extensive grading and recontouring of
existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved?
Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with
existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or
re -direct drainage flow unless into an existing drainage courses.
Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization measures.
The site and the house follows the Pxisting runtonrs of the land to minilni7P
the imnart of grading.
D. Does the site development plan preserve surrounding native
vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with
and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping
should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and
public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation,
integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
The design concept has to provide landscape planters stair stepping down as the
patio levels change with the existing grade.
E. Does the site development plan substantially preserve the
natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums
and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon
the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage
proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on
neighboring lots.
Our review of the information reflects the proposed development to be compatible
with neiehboring properties.
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with
the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks
shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be
imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness.
Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
setbacks of neighboring properties.
The design concept was to follow the existing buildable area outline and to
step the building down with the contours.
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles?
Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway
location, design, trip data and land&c,ning and other on -site parking
or storage areas.
Yes, the concept was to Provide a pprte c Mere, for ronvaniant arraas and
departure to the front entrance, ,,? Qare doors would he to the side to
minimize the view of the earaRe doors.
H. Does the site development pi_,.;11 conform with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project
impacts the environment, e.g., significant impact, proposed
mitigation measures.
No significant impact
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above
exhibits, present the data and information required
review criteria eevaluation to be the best --of my abi!
the facts, statements and other informaion presentee
correct to the best of my knowledge and beli f.
DATE: 03 /26/90
a in attached
the site plan
; and, ghat
Ore true and
S I GNA'URE
FOR J. Stasack
APPLICANT
ARCHINT ASSOCIATES
7
. a.
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by
ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed
restrictions enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association
("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA
are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and
approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not
mean or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence for property development is to obtain
City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the, above statement
has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood.
i L , Executed at-dLl►.h1LIZ , California
this 50 day of K/ , 199().
By:
By:
,gu6
Address
City
• #r
•
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I. (We, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct.
Executed at
this
?L.1►..E it_.c,c , , California,
'"?---,Tday of K ALe_.(319 r)
(Address)
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application
is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public
of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer
of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgments, that he
(it) owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its)
knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
FORMS ISSUED TO:
NAME Jay Stasack
ORGANIZATION Archint Associates
JOB ADDRESS 58 Eastfield Drive
Rolling Hills, GA 9UZ/4
H.N.M.
FILED
FEE
RECEIPT NO.
BY:
19
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
I,J4L41EES • ; _.-F , declare
under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names
and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they
appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within
the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet
from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
Executed at
.l i---1-4 day o
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Site Plan Review
Zone Change
,California, this
1 v 19
S ignatue
10