36, Permit swimming pool to extend, Resolutions & Approval Conditionsr •
1
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
COUNTY OF,LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2 In the Matter of the Application
3 of
4 JOHN N. HEATER,
5 Lot 24, . Eastfield (R.S. 58-6,10)
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
ZONING CASE NO. 36
FINDINGS AND FORMAL
The application of John N. Heater,
for side yard variances, came on for hearing
day of July, 1963, at the hour of 8:00 P.M.,
REPORT
Lot 24, Eastfield,
on the twenty-third
at the City Hall of
the City of Rolling H41s, California, and the applicant having
submittedevidencein support of his application, and the
Planning Commission being advised, now makes its Findings and
Formal'Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of
Rolling Hills, California.
•
The Commission finds that the applicant, John N. Heater,
is the owner of that gertain real property described as Lot 24,
Eastfield, located in the City of Rolling Hills, California, and
that notice of the public hearing in connection with said appli-
cation was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of
Ordinance No. 33, of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
II.
That no person appeared at said public hearing in
opposition to the application for variances and that no evidence
was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
-1-
The Commission further finds that the proposed
residence addition of applicant is to be located ten (10) 'and
one-half feet from the South property line of said Lot instead
of twenty (20) foot setback as required by said Zoning Ordinance,
and further that the proposed swimming pool to be located
fourteen (14) feet from the North property line of said Lot
instead of the required twenty foot setback as required by said
Zoning Ordinance, and further findd that the variances should be
granted to applicant in order to preserve substantial property
rights possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, and that the granting of such variances will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which
applicant's property is located, and that there are exceptional
and extraordinary circumstances and conditions by reasons of
physical location and terrain of said Lot 24, which do not apply
generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that variances
should be granted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rolling Hills to John N. Heater of Lot 24 of Eastfield in
accordance with the Plot Plans marked Exhibit I and Exhibit II
on file in these proceedings, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
Dated: August 1, 1963.
ecretary,GPlanning Commission
Chairman, Planning Commission
-2-