Loading...
181, Construct a tennis court, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of Dr. John Link Lot 124-RH ZONING CASE NO. 181 FINDINGS AND REPORT The application of Dr. John Link, Lot 124-RH, Rolling Hills Tract, for a conditional use permit under Section 3.01, Paragraph 3 (c) of Ordinance No. 112 for construction of a tennis court came on for hearing on the 17th day of May, 1977 in the Council Chambers of the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of the application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California. I. The Commission finds that the applicant, Dr. John Link, is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 124-RH located at 44 Portuguese Bend Road in the City of Rolling Hills, and that notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds, further, that no communication, written or verbal, was received inopposition to the request, and Mrs. Sylvia Cashman, 2 Crest Road East, whose property adjoins the Link property, called to say that she and Mr. Cashman were familiar with the proposed location for the court, and they had no objection. The Commission finds that the applicant requests the conditional use permit for construction of a tennis court in a legal location on the property, which consists of five acres in the RAS-2 zone. The applicant stated, further, that the tennis court would be sunken three feet, and would be 20 feet below the Cashman property, and would not be visible from any surrounding property. The Commission finds that a conditional use permit should be granted in order to preserve substantial property rights possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such conditional use permit would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone, and would meet all criteria for a tennis court, including(off-street parking. III. From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use permit should be granted under Section 3.01, Paragraph 3 (c) of Ordinance No. 112 for construction of a tennis court on Lot 124-RH to Dr. John Link, 44 Portuguese Bend Road, and it is, therefore, so ordered. /s/ Forrest Riegel Chairman a007u, 6?. //SecretarY, Planning mission