0935RESOLUTION NO. 935.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION
TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, A GUESTHOUSE, A DETACHED GARAGE
AND A FUTURE STABLE; GRANTING A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR
ENCROACHMENT OF THE GARAGE INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK;
GRANTING A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR LOCATING THE GUESTHOUSE IN
THE FRONT AREA OF A THROUGH LOT; AND GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMITS FOR THE GUESTHOUSE AND THE DETACHED GARAGE AT
AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 653 AT 40
EASTFIELD DRIVE, LOT 91 -EF. (TONSICH).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. Nicholas Tonsich with respect to real
property located at 40 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills (Lot 91 -EF) requesting a site plan review
request to construct a 666 square foot addition, a 596 square foot detached garage, an 800
square foot guesthouse and a future stable; a variance request for encroachment of the garage
into the side yard setback; a variance request to construct the guesthouse in the front area of a
through lot; and requests for conditional use permits to construct the guesthouse and the
detached garage.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to
consider the applications on August 20, and October 15, 2002, and at a field trip visit on
September 11, 2002. At the November 19, 2003, the Planning Commission approved the subject
project by Resolution No. 2002-15, by a vote of 4-1.
Section 3. At the November 25, 2002 City Council meeting the Council took
Jurisdiction of Zoning Case No. 653.
Section 4. The City Council conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the
application on January 13, 2003, February 10, 2003, February 24, 2003, March 10, 2003, May 12,
2003 and at a site visit on February 6, 2003. Staff accompanied Mayor Pro Tem Heinsheimer to
visit the project site on March 5, 2003, and Councilmember Black on March 18, 2003. The
applicants were notified of the public hearing in writing by first class mail and were in
attendance. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said
proposal, and from members of the City staff and the City Council having reviewed, analyzed
and studied said proposal.
Section 5: During the public hearing process and at the field trip, members of the
City Council expressed concern about the proximity of the proposed detached garage to the
adjacent residence and to the easement line. Councilmembers suggested that the proposed
garage be moved, to lessen the impact of the encroachment into the side yard setback. At the
May 12, 2003 public hearing the applicant agreed to locate the proposed detached garage
fourteen (14) feet from the westerly side yard setback, allowing for a six (6) foot encroachment
into the 20 -foot required side yard setback.
Section 6. The property is currently developed with a 2,355 square foot residence, a
400 square foot detached garage, 310 square foot storage structure, a 442 square foot
swimming pool, and a 51 square foot service yard/pool equipment shed. The service
yard/pool equipment shed is proposed to be relocated. The detached garage and storage
structure currently encroach into the side yard setback and are proposed to be demolished.
Section 7. Records show that the existing house with an attached garage was
constructed in 1950. There are no records on file for the detached garage or the storage
building. These structures, are therefore, not permitted. There are also no records indicating
that the attached garage, constructed with the house in 1950, was legally converted into living
space. An inspection by a Building Official shall be required to ascertain that the conversion
of the attached garage to living area was completed to the standards set forth in the applicable
Building Code.
Section 8. The City Council finds that the project qualifies as a Class 4 Exemption
(State of CA Guidelines, Section 15304 - Minor Land Alteration) and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 9. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site
plan review and approval before any development requiring a grading permit or any building
or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing
Resolution No. 935 -1-
buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the
building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the
building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With
respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting additions, construction of the
guesthouse, the detached garage and a future stable at an existing single-family residence, the
City Council makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General
Plan requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open
space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback
requirements with the Variance approved in Section 14 of this Resolution. The lot has a net
area of 39,664 square feet, as calculated for development purposes. The size of the existing and
proposed structures will be 5,360 square feet, which constitutes 13.5% of the net lot area, which
is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage permitted. The total lot coverage including
paved areas and driveways will be 11,783 square feet which equals 29.7% of the net lot, which
is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage permitted. The proposed project is screened
from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development.
B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot
by minimizing building coverage. The topography and the configuration of the lot, has been
considered, and it was determined that the proposed development will not adversely affect or
be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed
construction will be constructed on an existing building pads, will be the least intrusive to
surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with mature trees and shrubs, are of
sufficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of
surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious
infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass
with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to
properties in the vicinity. The proposed residential addition will follow the pattern and style of
the original residence. The proposed guesthouse will be built into the existing slope to
minimize its impact and eliminate the need to create a new building pad. The proposed 596
square foot detached garage will replace two illegal 710 square feet structures.
D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and native vegetation to the
maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan will supplement the existing
vegetation with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the
community.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state
of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause the lot to
look overdeveloped. The proposed additions were designed to minimize lot coverage.
Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped. The proposed addition, detached
garage and the guesthouse will not be visible from Eastfield Drive or from Outrider Road.
F. The development plan preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees
and supplements these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping which is compatible with
and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or
transition area between private and public areas.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience
and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will not
change the existing circulation pattern and will utilize an existing driveway.
H. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act
Section 10. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the City
Council hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 653 for
proposed structures, including the addition, detached garage, guest house and a future stable,
subject to the conditions contained in Section 19 of this Resolution.
Section 11. Section 17.16.210(A)(5) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits
approval of a guesthouse under certain conditions, provided the Planning Commission
approves a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant is requesting to construct an 800 square foot
guesthouse. Such guesthouse will be located in the front yard area of the lot. With respect to
this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council finds as follows:
Resolution No. 935 -2-
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a guesthouse
would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General
Plan and will be desirable for the public convenience and welfare because the use is consistent
with similar uses in the community, and the area proposed for the guesthouse would be
located in an area on the property where such use will not change the existing configuration of
structures on the lot.
B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and
structures have been considered, and the construction of a guesthouse will not adversely affect
or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the
proposed guesthouse will be nestled behind existing trees on the lower pad to promote pad
integration and is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the guesthouse will not
impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. In order to assure that views are
preserved, the Eucalyptus trees located in the vicinity of the proposed guesthouse will be
removed and alternate landscaping installed.
C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and
surrounding residences because the guesthouse will comply with the low profile residential
development pattern of the community and the structure already exists.
D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development
standards of the zone district because the 800 square foot size of the guesthouse is the
maximum permitted under the Municipal Code and the guesthouse does not encroach into any
setback areas.
E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles
County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous
waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous
Waste and Substances Sites List.
F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the
Zoning Code because an adequate area is set-aside for the construction of a future stable
structure and adjacent corral.
Section 12. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the
Planning Commission hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an
800 square foot guesthouse, subject to the conditions contained in Section 19 of this Resolution.
Section 13. Section 17.16.210(A)(4) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits
approval of a detached garage under certain conditions, provided a Conditional Use Permit for
such use is approved by the Planning Commission. The applicant is requesting to construct a
596 square foot detached garage. Such garage will be located in the same general area as the
existing illegal structures, which will be demolished, and will encroach ten feet into the side
yard setback. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council finds
as follows:
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a detached
garage would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and
General Plan and because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community. The area
proposed for the detached garage is the same general area on the property where a similar use
already exists and will not change the existing configuration of structures on the lot.
B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and
structures have been considered, and the construction of a detached garage will not adversely
affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the
proposed garage will be smaller in size than the existing structures at that location and will not
impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors.
C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and
surrounding residences because the detached garage will comply with the low profile
residential development pattern of the community.
D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development
standards of the zone district because the 596 square foot size of the detached garage is
permitted under the Municipal Code, with the Variance as approved in Section 16 of this
Resolution.
Resolution No. 935 -3-
E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles
County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous
waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California
Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.
F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the
Zoning Code because it will not be visible from the road or neighboring properties. A future
stable is proposed on the site.
Section 14. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the
Planning Commission hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 596
square foot detached garage, subject to the conditions contained in Section 19 of this
Resolution.
Section 15. Section 17.16.120 requires the side yard setback for every residential
parcel in the RA -S-1 Zone to be twenty (20) feet from the side property line. The applicant is
requesting to construct a detached garage, which will encroach ten feet into the side yard
setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the City Council finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable
to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same
zone. The Variance request is to replace an unauthorized structure, which already encroaches
into the side yard setback, with a new legal detached garage in the same general location. The
steep topography of the lot together with the fact that the lot is a through lot creates a
difficulty in constructing the garage elsewhere on the property.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied
to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because the existing terrain and
development on the lot creates a difficulty in placing the garage elsewhere on the property.
The lot is large for the zone in which it is located, however due to the double frontage of the lot
and the fact that a driveway, which serves the property to the east traverses the entire width of
this lot, the net lot area for development purposes is drastically reduced. The proposed
detached garage will minimize the need to grade, as the existing access to the proposed garage
will be utilized.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located. The proposed garage will follow along the line of the existing
encroachment of the unauthorized structures, which will be demolished and will mitigate the
necessity for any additional grading.
Section 16. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the
Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 653 to permit the
detached garage to encroach six (6) feet into the westerly side yard setback, subject to the
conditions specified in Section 19 of this Resolution.
Section 17. Section 17.16.110 requires that front yard setback be fifty (50) feet from the
roadway easement line, and Section 17.16.130 requires that the rear yard setback be fifty (50)
feet from the rear property line. Section 17.12.250 requires that where a rear yard abuts a street,
it shall be considered a front yard, as defined in the Zoning Code. Therefore, the required
setback is measured from the roadway easement and not from the property line. In addition,
no construction is allowed in the front yard, other than the primary residence. The applicant is
requesting to construct an 800 square foot guesthouse, to be located in the rear of the primary
residence, but on that portion of the lot that abuts a street, as this lot is a through lot, which
means it fronts on two streets. With respect to this request for a Variance, the City council
finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable
to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class
of use in the same zone because the lot is a through lot. In any other circumstance the location
of the proposed guesthouse would be allowed without a variance. The guesthouse will be
located behind existing shrubbery close to an existing hillside slope and away from the street.
The proposed location of the guesthouse is desired so as to preserve the safety and integrity of
the slopes and leave nearly all of the existing open space of the lower pad of the property
unaffected.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied
to the property in question. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a
Resolution No. 935 -4-
manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. The location of the
building pads and the development pattern of the remaining structures on site, especially the
driveways dictate that the proposed guesthouse be located in the rear of the existing residence,
but in the front yard area due to the double frontage of the lot.
C. The granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located because the proposed development will not be visible
to neighbors and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious
infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners.
Section 18. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the
Planning Commission hereby approves a Variance for Zoning Case No. 653 to permit the
construction of an 800 square foot guesthouse in the front yard area of a through lot subject to
the conditions specified in Section 19 of this Resolution.
Section 19 The Site Plan Review approval regarding the additions, and construction
of the guesthouse and a detached garage approved in Section 10 of this Resolution, the
Conditional Use Permit regarding the construction of a guesthouse approved in Section 12, the
Conditional Use Permit regarding the construction of the detached garage approved in Section
14, the Variance regarding the side yard encroachment of the detached garage approved in
Section 16 and the Variance regarding the location of the guesthouse approved in Section 18 of
this Resolution are subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan Review, Variances, and Conditional Use Permits approvals shall
expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.38.070(A),
17.42.070(A), and 17.46.080(A) of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to
the requirements of those sections.
B. If any conditions if approval are violated, this approval shall be suspended and
the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given
written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if
requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a
period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Building Code, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in
which the subject property is located must be complied with, unless otherwise set forth in this
approval.
D. A revised site plan showing the 6 -foot side yard setback encroachment with the
garage shall be submitted to the Planning Department. The lot shall be developed and
maintained in substantial conformance with the revised site plan, except as otherwise
provided in these conditions.
E. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 5,360 square feet or 13.5% in
conformance with structural lot coverage limitations.
F. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 11,783 square
feet or 29.7% in conformance with lot coverage limitations.
G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 15,866 square feet or 40.0% in
conformance with disturbed area limitations.
H. Residential building pad coverage on the 10,069 square foot residential building
pad shall not exceed 4,110 square feet or 40.8%; coverage on the existing 2,307 square foot
guesthouse/ future stable pad shall not exceed 54.2%.
I. The guesthouse shall not exceed 800 square feet of floor area, and shall comply
with the requirements as specified in Section 17.16.210A(5) of the Zoning Ordinance,
including, but not be limited to the following:
1. No kitchen or other cooking facilities shall be provided within the
guesthouse.
2. No vehicular access or paved parking area shall be developed within fifty feet of
the proposed guesthouse.
3. Renting of the guesthouse is prohibited.
4. Occupancy of the guesthouse shall be limited to persons employed on the
premises and their immediate family, the immediate family members of the occupants of the
Resolution No. 935 -5-
main residence or the temporary guests of the occupants of the main residence. No guest may
remain in occupancy for more than thirty days in any six-month period.
J. Grading shall not exceed 111 cubic yards of cut soil and 111 cubic yards of fill
soil. Grading shall be balanced on site and shall preserve the existing flora to the greatest
extent possible.
K. The proposed retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not exceed a
height of 5 feet at any one point, averaging no more than 2.5 feet.
L. The existing unauthorized detached structures shall be demolished. The new
detached garage shall be constructed and completed concurrently with the additions to the
house and/or the construction of the guesthouse. No final inspection for occupancy of the
additions and/or the guesthouse shall be granted unless and until the detached garage is
completed and ready for a final inspection.
M. Prior to conducting a final inspection for the additions, detached garage and/or
the guesthouse, an inspection of that part of the house, which was converted from a garage
into living area, shall be conducted by the Los Angeles County Building and Safety
Department. The applicant shall request such an inspection and pay all applicable fees. If any
deficiencies are found, they shall be corrected prior to securing a final inspection from the
Building and Safety Department for any of the other improvements.
N. In the event that the approvals contained in this Resolution expire, as stipulated
in Section 19, subparagraph "A" of this Resolution, the City will immediately initiate code
enforcement proceedings to assure that a legal two -car garage is provided on the property,
and that the converted garage is inspected and that it complies with all applicable building
codes.
O. In the event that only some of the improvements approved by this Resolution are
constructed, the unauthorized garage and storage structure shall be demolished and the
applicant shall construct the approved detached garage, apply to the Planning Commission for
modified garage or apply to legalize the existing unauthorized structure. A final inspection for
the improvements will not be granted, unless there exists a legal garage on the property,
which is to be completed concurrently with any other improvements. An inspection of the
converted living , area, as required in subparagraph "M" above, shall be required prior to
securing final inspection for any of the improvements or for the new garage.
P. Two sets of landscaping plans for the areas surrounding the guesthouse and for
all other graded areas, as well as the garage area shall be submitted for review and approval to
the Planning staff. The landscape plan shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum
extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic
controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and
climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff
and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements)
of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
Q. Landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as not to
obstruct views of neighboring properties but to obscure the guesthouse and the detached
garage from the neighbors and from the roadways. The trees and shrubs at full maturity shall.
not exceed the ridge height of the structures. The Eucalyptus trees located in the vicinity of the
proposed guesthouse shall be removed, so as to prevent future view obstruction.
R. Two copies of landscaping plans and a cost estimate for material, labor and
irrigation to implement the landscaping plan shall be submitted for review by the Planning
Department prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping
plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading permit and shall be
retained with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. After the two-
year period, upon the request of the applicant, the retained bond will be released by the City
Manager after the City Manager or his designee determines that the landscaping was installed
pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly
established and in good condition.
S. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from
wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in
accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local
ordinances and engineering practices.
Resolution No. 935 -6-
T. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and engineering practices
so that people or property is not exposed to landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence
shall be required.
U. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district
requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and
engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise,
dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
V. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in
Section 7010 of the 1998 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to
minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution as
required by the County of Los Angeles.
W. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site.
X. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and
regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM
and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment
noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of
Rolling Hills.
Y. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality
Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and
maintenance of storm water drainage facilities.
Z. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality
Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's)
related to solid waste and storm water pollution prevention.
AA. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community
Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any grading or building
permits.
AB. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of, Building and
Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan described in Condition D.
AC. Prior to granting a final inspection and/or certificate of occupancy, all utility
lines shall be placed underground.
AD. The City's and the Community Association's requirements related to outdoor
lighting, roofing material and construction and all other requirements shall be complied with.
AE. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los
Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and
hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning
Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their
review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope
ratio.
AF. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the
Variances, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approvals, pursuant to Section
17.38.060, or the approval shall not be effective.
AG. All conditions, when applicable, of the Variances, Conditional Use Permits and
Site Plan Review approvals must be complied with prior to the issuance of a grading or
building permit from the County of Los Angeles.
AH. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the property, which would constitute additional
grading or structural development, shall require the filing of a new application for approval
by the Planning Commission.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF MAY, 2003.
FRANK E. HILL, MAYOR
Resolution No. 935 -7-
ATTEST:
��/A47
CRAIG NVLIS, CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ��
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution 935 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN
ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, A GUESTHOUSE, A
DETACHED GARAGE AND A FUTURE STABLE; GRANTING A VARIANCE
REQUEST FOR ENCROACHMENT OF THE GARAGE INTO THE SIDE YARD
SETBACK; GRANTING A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR LOCATING THE
GUESTHOUSE IN THE FRONT AREA OF A THROUGH LOT; AND
GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR THE GUESTHOUSE AND
THE DETACHED GARAGE AT AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
IN ZONING CASE NO. 653 AT 40 EASTFIELD DRIVE, LOT 91 -EF. (TONSICH).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 27, 2003 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
anan�ilmempeirlj.Black, Lay, Pernell, Mayor Pro -Tem Heinsheimer
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
//L
CI"EkK
Resolution No. 935 -8-
1
1
1