1060 RESOLUTION N0. 1060
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE
RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING
BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION;
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS;
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW
AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN FEES AND
ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE
IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE
INII'LEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND
REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854,
931 and 1034.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for
processing discretionary cases for Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions and shall be paid
by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision)
and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code:
A. Site Plan Review $ 1,500
B. Conditional Use Permit $ 1,500
C. Variance $1,250
D. Variance, Minor $ 750
1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and
attached to main residential structure
E. Multiple discretionary reviews; Most expensive fee for the first
review and 1/2 fee for second
review. No cost for third or more
reviews.
F. Lighting Ordinance Modification $ 750
G. Outdoor Lighting Audit $150 (initiated by resident)
H. Time extension $ 200
I. Zone Change $ 2,000
J. General Plan Amendment $ 2,000
K. Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $ 2,000
L Discretionary Approval Modification $ 2/3 of original application fee
_ M. Appeal Fee $ 2/3 of original application fee
N. Planning Commission interpretation $375. Fee to be credited if
and miscellaneous Planning results in filing of a formal
Commission reviews application to Planning
Commission
O. Environmental Review for $ 200
Determination of discretionary permits
New and amended provisions are in bold
Resolution No 1060 1
P. Negative Declaration As adjusted annually by the CA
Dept. of Fish and Game,plus 20%
Q. Mitigated Negative Declaration As adjusted annually by the CA
Dept. of Fish and Game,plus 20%
R. Environmental Impact Reports Consultant fee, plus 20%
S. County Clerk Processing Fee $100
T. � Lot Line Adjustment $ 1,500, plus County fee
U. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20%
V. Final Parcel/Tract Map County fee plus 20%
W. Zoning violation and construction $1,000
penalty fee
1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or consiruction or
non-compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission
review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application
review fee
X. Stop work order $ 200
1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued
beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and
grading activity requiring Plannirtg Commission review and
approval
Y. Service Request County fee plus 20%
(For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General
Services Agreement)
Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for
processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases:
A. View Impairment $500
B. Traffic Commission Review
1. New driveways or other traffic $ 300
related items
Section 3. The following fees are established and charged for General
Administration processing:
A. General Plan $30
B. Zoning Code � 25 `
C. Subdivision Code $ 25
D. Meeting Tapes (Audio) $ 25
E. Budget $30
F. Zoning Map $3
Nezo and amended prmrisions are in bold
Resolution No 1060 2
G. Xeroxed copies, each page $ 0.25
H. False Alarms 1St $ 50
2nd $ 100
3=d $ 150
4� $ 200
5� $ 250
Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit
pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code:
A. 1. BUILDING PERNIIT Two and one-half times the amount set
forth in the Building Code for each fee,
table and schedule therein.
2. PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shall pay
2% of the first$100,000 of construction
valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation
over $ 100,000.
B. PLUMBING PERMIT Two and one-half times the amount set
forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee,
table and schedule therein.
C. MECHANICAL PEIZMIT Two and one-half times the amount set
forth in the Mechanical Code for each
fee, table and schedule therein.
D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT Two and one-half times the amount set
forth in the Electrical Code for each fee,
table and schedule therein.
E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed
SITE AND PLAN REVIEW structures; however, minimum fee shall
be$535.00 and the maximum fee shall
be $3,588.00
Section 5. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit
pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for
review conducted by the City's contract building official, other than Los Angeles County
Department of Building and Safety:
A. BUILDING PERMIT In addition to the provisions of Section
4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge
on Los Angeles County Department of
Building and Safety fees shall be
charged for the alternative use of the
City's contract building official.
B. PLUMBING PERMIT In addition to the provisions of Section
4 B. of this resolution, a 25% surcharge
. on Los Angeles County Department of
Building and Safety fees shall be
charged for the alternative use of the
City's contract building official.
Ne¢v and amended provisions are in bold
Resolution No 1060 3
C. MECHANICAL PERMIT In addition to the provisions of Section
4 C of this resolution, a 25% surcharge
on Los Angeles County Department of
Building and Safety fees shall be
charged for the alternative use of the
City's contract building official.
D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT In addition to the provisions of Section
4 D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on
Los Angeles County Department of
Building and Safety fees shall be charged
for the alternative use of the City's -
contract building official.
E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT,
SITE AND PLAN REVIEW In addition to the provisions of Section
4 E of this resolution, a 25% surcharge
on Los Angeles County Department of
Building and Safety fess shall be
charged for the alternative use of the
City's contract building official.
Section 6. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each
permit relating to consirucHon and demolition waste:
A. CONSTRUCTION AND $25 single project permit
DEMOLITION $250 annual permit
Section 7. The new fees set forth in this Resolution denoted in bold do not exceed
the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services as demonstrated in the calculations
set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Calculations in
reference to the original fees established by Resolutions 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034
are available at City Hall.
Section 8. The City Council Resolutions Nos. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034 are
hereby rescinded.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of y, 200
TH HE SHEIMER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Heidi Luce
Interim Deputy City Clerk
Neeo and amended provisions are in bold
Resolution No 1060 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1060 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE
RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING
BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION;
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS;
° GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW
AND VIEW INII'AIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN FEES AND
ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE
INII'LEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLTTION ORDINANCE
INII'LEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND
REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854,
931 and 1034.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 11, 2009 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers��B-l:ack, Hill , Ma-yor_Pro Tem Pernell and
Mayor Heinsheimer .
NOES: tv o n e .
ABSENT: Councilmember Lay.
ABSTAIN: N o n e .
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Nezo and amended provisions are in bold
Resolurion No 1060 5
RESOLUTION N0. 1061 NOT ADAPTED
Page 1 of 1
Resolution No. 1061