1076RESOLUTION NO. 1076
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR
GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE AND GRANTING A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES TO
EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT
AND TO CONSTRUCT A STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD
IN ZONING CASE NO. 767, AT 0 PINE TREE LANE, (LOT 101-2-RH),
(TURPANJIAN). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Turpanjian with respect to real
property located at 0 Pine Tree Lane (Lot 101-2-RH), Rolling Hills, CA., for a Site Plan Review
for grading and construction of a 9,590 square foot residence with 1,460 square foot garage, 950
square feet of covered porches, 828 square foot porte-cochere, 1,618 square feet of trellises, 96
square foot service yard; 629 square foot swimming pool, 50 sq.ft. barbecue area, 64 square foot
pool equipment area, and a 750 square foot stable with corral. The maximum height of the
residence is proposed to be 19.5 feet from the finished floor. Grading for this project will consist of
12,760 cubic yard of cut and fill. Also proposed is a 5 -foot wall along the driveway for
approximately 120 feet with a 3 -foot wall along the remaining portion of the driveway, a parking
area past the stable and combination of 2:1 and 3:1 slopes behind the building pad (north and north
west side of the pad). No basement is proposed with this development.
The application also includes request for Variances to locate the stable and corral in the front yard
area of the lot and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot by 17.4%, whereas
40% maximum disturbed area is permitted.
Section 2. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2009-07, on August 18, 2009
granting approval in Zoning Case No. 767. The vote was 3-1-0-1. Commissioner DeRoy dissented
and Commissioner Smith was absent.
Section 3. The City Council took this case under jurisdiction at the August 24 City Council
meeting and conducted duly noticed public hearings on September 14, 2009, October 12, and at a
field visit on October 9, 2009. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by
first class mail. Evidence was_ heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said
proposal and from members of the City staff, and the City Council having reviewed, analyzed and
studied said proposal. The applicants and their representatives were in attendance at the hearings.
Section 4. No neighbors came forward to either support or object to the project, although two
neighbors attended the field trip.
Section 5. The City Council finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (The
State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from
environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 6. Section 17 .46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan
Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure
may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be
made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at
least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than
twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan
Review application requesting grading and construction of a new residence, the City Council
makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan
requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space
between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements,
and specifically the coverage of the lot by structures is much less than the maximum permitted.
Resolution No. 1076
ZC NO. 767
0 Pine Tree Lane
The net lot area of the lot is 138,081 square feet, (3.16 acres). The structural lot coverage of the net
lot is proposed to 16,035 sq.ft. or 11.6% (excluding the barbecue), which is within the maximum
20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including all structures, paved
areas and driveway will be 31,753 sq.ft. or 23.0% of the net lot, which is within the 35% maximum
overall net lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is screened from the road so as to
reduce the visual impact of the development.
B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of
the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the lot to look
overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open
space on the property. The applicants propose to tuck the development in, so that it is not greatly
visible from any of the surrounding streets and properties. The nature, condition, and development
of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and
the construction of the new house will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the
adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed structure will be constructed on a
portion of the lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and
landscaped with trees and shrubs, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the
proposed structures will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will
substantially utilize the existing building pad, but will be lower, for the new construction.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with
the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The lot is over 3 acres (net) in size and the
structures are not going to make the lot look overdeveloped. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot
coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded. Several residences in the
vicinity have been approved that are comparable in size.
D. There is no native or sensitive vegetation on the property. A biological study of the
project site determined that only non-native grasses exist in the area of the site subject to grading
and improvements and no remediation measures were recommended. The project will be screened
from other properties and the road by introducing mature plants, which is a part of this approval.
E. The development plan follows to the maximum extent practicable contours of the
site to minimize grading and retain the natural drainage courses. Grading for this project will
involve 12,760 cubic yards of cut and fill, total and will be balanced on site. In order to screen the
house from other properties and from the major streets the applicants propose to lower the pad.
Extensive grading is required to construct access to the residence. Due to the configuration of the
lot the building pad is situated towards the rear of the property, necessitating a long driveway.
F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and
safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the site is accessible from a fully
developed street and no changes in circulation are anticipated. -
G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act and is exempt.
Section 7. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit
approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when
exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other
similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to
the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. Section 17.16.110 requires that
the front yard setback be fifty (50) feet from the roadway easement line, and be unobstructed from
the ground upwards. In order to construct the 750 square foot stable with 850 square foot corral in
the front yard, the applicants are seeking a Variance. With respect to this request for a Variance,
the City Council finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to
the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone. Due
to the shape of the lot the proposed residence will be located towards the rear of the property. The
slope behind the proposed building pad is too extreme to place any structures. In addition the
stable would have to be too close to the house and/or in the setback, which is not desirous. The
existing residence has been developed towards the rear of the lot to garner the extraordinary views
from the rear of the lot. There is not an adequate area in the rear to construct a future stable and
corral without also requiring a variance or impairing the view. The topography of the lot together
Resolution No. 1076
ZC NO. 767
0 Pine Tree Lane 2
with shape of the lot create difficulty in constructing the stable and corral elsewhere on the
property.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the
property in question because due to the existing grade, narrow lot configuration at the front of the
lot it would be a hardship to located the stable in the rear yard. In addition, the extraordinary view
from the rear yard would be blocked from the house. The expansive open space in the front yard
comfortably supports the stable. The narrow nature of the property places a hardship on locating
the stable in the side or rear. areas.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located because stables are encouraged to be constructed in the City, neighbors are used
to seeing stables along streets in other parts of the City and this proposed stable would not affect
anyone's views and therefore property value and would be screened from the street.
D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be
observed in that the proposed construction will be orderly, attractive and shall protect the rural
character of the community. As it is required by the Zoning Ordinance to either set aside an area
for a stable and corral or construct it, in this case the front yard construction is a suitable area.
E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills
because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low-
density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures and a
set aside area for a future stable and corral or the construction of a stable and corral.
Section 8. Sections 17.38.014 through 17.38.054 of the Code permit approval of a variance
from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when, due to exceptional or
extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone, strict application of the Code would deny the property owner
_ substantial property rights enjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone. The applicant
seeks a variance from the 40% maximum disturbed area standard set forth in Section 17.16.070 of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. 79,217 square feet or 57.4% of the net lot area is proposed to be
disturbed. With respect to this request for a Variance, the City Council finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to
the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use
in the same zone. The Variance for the total disturbance is necessary because the unusual shape of
the lot necessitates great amount of disturbance for the construction of the driveway. Due to the
extreme slope in the rear of the lot it is not possible to construct a driveway from the rear. The
shape of the lot with the very narrow frontage makes it difficult to meet the letter of the law.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to
the property in question. The Variance is necessary because of the unusual shape of the lot.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located. The project as conditioned by this Resolution will be adequately screened to
prevent adverse visual impact to surrounding properties. A minor increase in the overall
percentage of disturbed area on the lot will have no effect on the public welfare or on property or
improvements in the vicinity.
In granting the Variance, the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed. The
purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to regulate development in an orderly fashion and in a manner
consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Approval of the variance will not
impede any goals of the Zoning Ordinance or the General Plan. Rather, the variance will allow the
property owner to enjoy the same rights and privileges afforded to other property owners in the
vicinity. The overage requested is not substantial and does not undermine the spirit or intent of
the Zoning Ordinance.
Resolution No. 1076
ZC NO. 767
0 Pine Tree Lane
D. The variance does not grant special privileges to the applicant. To the contrary,
absent a variance, the property owner would be deprived of the same rights and privileges afforded
to other property owners in the vicinity. Unique circumstances applicable to the subject property
make it infeasible for the property owner to comply with Section 17.16.070.
E. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles
Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste
facilities.
F. The variance request is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project,
together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and -
programs specified in the General Plan.
Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings in Sections 6, 7 and 8, the City Council hereby
approves the Site Plan Review application and Variances in Zoning Case No. 767 for grading and
construction of a new residence, garage, and stable to be located in the front yard, as well as to
exceed the maximum permitted disturbance on the lot, as shown on the Site Plan dated August 10,
2009 subject to the following conditions:
A. The conditions of approval specified herein shall be printed on the Plans submitted
to RHCA and to Building and Safety Department for plan check and on all subsequent plans.
B. The Site Plan Review and Variances approvals shall expire within two years from
the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within
that time period, as required by Sections 17.46.080(A) and 17.38.070(A) of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of
those sections.
C. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof
are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse;
provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity
for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails
to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's
determination.
D. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning
Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless
otherwise set forth in this approval, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
E. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the
revised site plan on file dated August 10, 2009 and cross sections dated July 21, 2009 and August
10, 2009. No basement is proposed with this development.
F. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety (either
County or Engineering consultants), for plan check review must conform to the development plan
approved with this application. In addition, prior to submittal of final plans to the Building
Department for issuance of building permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to staff for
verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the City Council.
G. Grading shall not exceed a total of 12,760 cubic yard of cut and fill and shall be
balanced on site. Only excavated material including from the pool may be hauled away.
H. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 15,985 square feet or 11.6%, (excl.
barbecue).
I. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 31,753 square feet
or 23.0% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. The turn around area of the driveway past
the stable shall be of pervious material.
J. The disturbance of the lot shall not exceed 79,217 square feet of surface area or
57.4%, as approved by this Variance.
Resolution No. 1076
ZC NO. 767
0 Pine Tree Lane
K. Residential building pad coverage on the 47,286 square feet residential building pad
shall not exceed 26.6% (not including portion of the covered porches, the trellis and barbecue).
The stable pad shall be 1,950 square feet;and have coverage of 38.5%.
L. A minimum of four -foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be
paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of the residence, garage and stable.
M. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, two sets of landscaping plans for
the graded areas shall be submitted to staff for review. The property shall be landscaped and
screened from adjacent properties. Shrubs and trees for the entire property shall be planted in an
offset manner, and in a sufficient distance from each other so that when mature would not create a
hedge, but a see through screen. Any trees and shrubs planted in conjunction with this project or
thereafter shall be of such species that at maturity shall not be higher than the ridgeline of the
residence.
N. The existing or like landscaping along the slope of Blackwater Canyon Road shall
be maintained. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation that incorporates low gallonage
irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using
"hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions, and utilizes means to reduce water
waste resulting from runoff and overspray. Refer to the Biological Resources Assessment study
prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants for this site (p. 19) for recommendations of
suitable plants.
O. Two copies of the landscaping and irrigation plan for the graded areas, residence
and pool and a cost estimate for material, labor and irrigation to implement the landscaping plan,
shall be submitted for review by the Planning Department and City's landscaping consultant prior
to the issuance of a grading permit.
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping plan
plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading permit and shall be retained
with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. After the two-year growing
season, upon the request of the applicant, the retained bond will be released by the City only after
staff determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved,
and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition.
P. Per the recommendation of the Traffic Commission, the driveway shall be 20 feet
wide with 24 -foot apron with a radius that meets the 20 -foot width approximately 6 -feet back from
the paved roadway. The apron shall be roughened for equestrian passage. No curbing, walls,
planting or architectural features, such as pilasters shall be constructed that would obstruct
vehicular visibility exiting the driveway or obstruct equestrian activity in the easement. To aid
drainage and soften the paved look, the driveway may have strips or edges of decorative pervious
material. The turn around area past the stable shall be of pervious material.
Q. The proposed walls along the driveway may not exceed 5 feet at any one point and
shall vary in height, as shown on the site plan dated August 10, 2009, from a 6 inch curb to five
feet and shall be screened with landscaping to maximum extend practicable.
R. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills and
RHCA roofing material standards, Outdoor Lighting Standards and undergrounding of utility lines
requirements, as well as all other requirements of the Municipal Code.
S. The stable shall not exceed 750 square feet and may not have a loft. The floor of the
stalls and the outside area immediately adjacent to the entrance of the stalls shall be covered with
dirt or other animal friendly pervious surface. The stable shall not be converted to other uses.
T. 50% of the demolition and construction materials must be recycled and diverted.
The hauler must be licensed by the City and have all appropriate insurance.
U. During and after construction perimeter easements and trails shall remain free and
clear of encroachments including, but not be limited to, site development, fences -including
construction fences, grading, landscaping, irrigation, drainage devices, play equipment, parked
vehicles, building materials, debris and other equipment, unless otherwise approved by the RHCA.
Resolution No. 1076
ZC NO. 767
0 Pine Tree Lane
V. No drainage device may be located in such a manner as to contribute to erosion or
in any way affect an easement, trail or adjacent properties. The energy dissipaters shall be designed
in such a manner as to not cross over any equestrian trails or easements. The drainage system(s)
shall not discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of
the dissipater and shall be screened from any trail and neighbors views to the maximum extent
practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system.
W. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district
requirements, so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and
objectionable odors shall be required, including but not be limited to the following:
Fugitive Dust
- Water the site twice daily, including the stockpiled dirt
- Apply non-toxic soil stabilizers to inactive graded areas
- Periodically clean the roads at the end of the day if visible soil is carried onto
paved roads adjacent to the site. If water sweeper is to be used, it shall use reclaimed
water
- Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit the construction site onto paved
roads or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip
- All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials shall be covered
- Traffic speed limits shall be observed at all times
The applicants shall explore the feasibility of using reclaimed water for all of their
watering requirements during construction.
Construction Eauipment Exhaust
- Heavy construction equipment shall be properly tuned and maintained to reduce
emissions. Construction equipment shall be fitted with the most modern emission
control devices, subject to periodic inspections by City Building Inspector.
- Provide temporary traffic controls such as a flag person, during the delivery of
heavy equipment or building materials to maintain smooth traffic flow.
- Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power
generators
- No vehicles shall idle in excess of five minutes, both on-site and off-site.
X. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate
construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM,
Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted,
so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
Y. During grading and construction operations, trucks shall not park, queue and/or idle
at the project site or in the adjoining right-of-way before or after the permitted hours of operations.
In addition, there shall be no staging of equipment or accumulation of vehicles on the adjacent
streets. All staging and parking shall be on the subject site, and if necessary adjacent roadway
easements.
Z. The contractors and subcontractors are to encourage their employees to car-pool
into the City.
AA. During grading/construction proper construction signs shall be installed along the
street warning drivers of the construction.
AB. The applicant shall submit a geotechnical report for review and approval by the
County of Los Angeles or City's Engineering consulting Geologist prior to issuance of a grading
permit. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan for plan check, a detailed grading
and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports must be submitted to the
Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review.
AC. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed steepness as shown on the development plan,
cross section- dated July 21 and site plan dated August 10, 2009. To the greatest extent practicable,
effort should be made to create gentler slopes than 2:1, without exceeding disturbance of the lot.
Resolution No. 1076
ZC NO. 767
0 Pine Tree Lane
AD. As part of the soils and geology report, location for a future septic tank to serve the
new single family residence will be established. All applicable State and County requirements,
including County Health Department, pertaining to septic tanks construction and maintenance shall
be complied with.
AE. The applicant shall comply with grading requirements relative to submitting
grading and construction reports on a bi-weekly basis, or as otherwise required by the Building and
Grading Code.
AF. The applicant shall comply with requirements for bonding for grading and all other
requirements resulting from the review of the soils and geology reports.
AG. The applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a drainage plan from the
Building Official, prior to issuance of any grading permits and/or a building permit for new
construction. Prior to the submittal of a final building plan to the Building Department for plan
check, a detailed drainage plan that conforms to the development plan as approved by the City
Council shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for review and approval.
AH. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in
Section 7010 of the 2008 County of Los Angeles Building Code shall be followed to minimize
erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the
County of Los Angeles.
Al. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality
Control Board and County Public Works Department requirements for the installation and post
construction maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities.
AJ. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality
Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMPs) related
to solid waste.
AK. The applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a Local Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City of Rolling Hills and the Building Official, prior to issuance
of any grading permits and/or a building permit for new construction.
AL. The applicant shall submit and obtain approval of Standard Urban Storm water
Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) to the City of Rolling Hills and the Building Official, prior to issuance
of any grading permits and/or a building permit for new construction.
AM. The applicant shall submit a Notice of Intent to the State Water Resource Control
Board under the General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit for grading of one acre or
more of land area and shall meet all of the permitting requirements.
AN. An Erosion Control Plan per County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code
requirements shall be prepared to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control
storm water pollution as required by the Code.
AO. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community
Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of grading or building permit.
AP. Until the applicants execute and record an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions
of this Site Plan Review and Variances approvals, as required by the Municipal Code, the
approvals shall not be effective.
AQ. All conditions of the Site Plan and Variances approvals, that apply, shall be
complied with prior to the issuance of grading or building permit.
AR. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modification or addition to this project or to the property, may be
constructed with approval by the Planning Commission.
Resolution No. 1076
ZC NO. 767
0 Pine Tree Lane
AS. During the entire construction process, the property lines, easement lines and
setback lines shall be staked, and the stakes kept in good condition along the front, along the north
side property line and the rear.
AT. No building permit for grading and/or construction for the stable shall be issued
until grading and/or building permits have been obtained for the residence and work is ready to
commence on the residence project.
AU. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and Public Works
Department fees, including City's Parks and Recreation Fees and Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified
School District fees for new residence.
AV. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public
hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the
Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEI
ATTEST:
HEIDI LUCE, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 1076
ZC NO. 767
0 Pine Tree Lane
1
1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1076 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR
GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE AND GRANTING A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES TO
EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT
AND TO CONSTRUCT A STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD
IN ZONING CASE NO. 767, AT 0 PINE TREE LANE, (LOT 101-2-RH),
(TURPANRAN). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the CITY COUNCIL on OCTOBER 26,
2009 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Hill, Lay, Mayor Pro Tem Pernell and Mayor Heinsheimer.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilmember Black.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
ak
HEIDI LUCE
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 1076
ZC NO. 767
0 Pine Tree Lane
9