2016-17 RESOLUTTON NO. 2016�17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REViEW
FOR A SWIMMING POOL/SPA, WALLS, FIRE PIT, BARBECUE, PO4L
EQUIPMENT, AND A VARIANCE TO EXCEED 2.5' HIGH AVERAGE
FOR ASSOCTATED WALLS IN ZONING CASE NO. 90b AT 27 CREST
ROAD WEST, (LQT 174-B-MS}, ROLLING HILLS, CA (GOLDENBERG).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND 4RDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Nlr. and Mrs. Goldenberg for a
1,375 square foot pool with infinity edge, with several terraced retaining wa11s rang'�ng
from 1' to 4'8" high for pool area, associated grading totaling 388 cubic yaxds, 64 squa�e
feet of pool equipment enclosed with 5' high maximum wall, and a 5' high wall to
enclose a maste�r bath courtyard for privacy. A new b$ square foot barbecue structure
and a 40 square foo�t fire pit a�e also proposed. The privacy wall will not average out to
2.5' in height, thus the varzance request.
Secfion 2. The Planning Coxnmission conducted duly noticed public hearings
to consider the application on May 17, 201b, on June 21, 2016 at a field trip and an
evening meeting on the same day. The applicant-s were notified o£the public hearings in
writing by fixst class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons
interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City sta£f and the
Planxung Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The
applicants' representative was in attendance at the public hearings.
Section 3. The proper�y is zone�i RAS-2 axld the gross lot area is 4.5 acres. The
net lot area is 3.$1 acres or 165,986 square feet. The property is currently developed
with a 14,b83 square foot residence and a 1,173 square foot garage, a 7,000 squa:re foot
recreation court, 1,690 square feet of entryways, b24 square feef of trellises, and a 200
square foot service yard.
In 2004 the previous owner was g�ranted an administrative approval to convert
the then existing 996 squa7re foot stable into part of the residence {used now as a
recreation room} and attached it via a solid roo� breezeway to the main residence. As
this was an addition of under 25% of the size of the then residence, it was approved
administratively. At tha� time the previous property owner elected to set aside an area
on the propex�y £or a future stable/corra�. In 2007 and 2015 adrninisixative approvals
were granted for interior remodel of the residence.
Section 4. The project is exempt from the Califortua Environmental Quality
Act{CEQA) pursuant to Section 1�303, Class 3 exemption Guidelines.
Reso. 201b-�7
27 Crest Road Wesf
Section 5. Sections 17.46.020 and 17.16.200G require a deveiapment plan to be
submitted far Site Plan Review for grading and for swixnming poois exceeding 800
square feEt, and Section 17.16.7�90F requires a Site Plan revie�r for walls over 3 feet in
height. With respect to the Site Plan Review application £or grading and for the
improvements the Planning Commission makes the followzng findings of£act:
A. The proposed development i� cornpatible with the General Plan and
surrounding uses because the praposed project complies with the requirement of low
profile, low-density residential deve7oprnent with sufficient open space between
surrounding structures. The project conforms with deveiopment standard
requirements for Iof cov�rage and disturbance of the Zoning Ordinance. The gradirtg
for the improvemenfs is minor (388 cubic yards) on a Iarge Iot and it mostl� consists of
excavation for tl�e larger pool. The resulting slopes will match the slopes curren�ly
surrounding the outdoor amenities and therefore the lat wou�d not have the appearance
of having unnatural terrain, as all of the grading blends into a natural, existing looking
condition. The tiered walls range in height from 1' to 4'8" high for the pool area and
will average out ta 2'6". The tiered walls are being introduced to avoid having 5' high
retaining walls around the pool and at the back of the infinity edge, and will be
screened by landscaping so as to reduce fhe visual impact of the development. The
swimming poo� wi11 be Iocated in a flat area behind the house on a portian of the
property away from any other residence and street and wilI not be visible or obtrusive
to neighbors. The 3,458 square foot on grade deck will not be visible from any street or
neighbors.
Regarding requested Site Plan Aeview from Zoning Ordinanee Section 17.16.150
�elating to walls over 3 feet in height, the wall to enclose t11e area for �he pool
equipment is proposed in an area that has two exis�ing walls already and is in a
depre�sed area, a�ay from thte prixnary living area. A 3' high wall would not
adequately screen the pool equipment. The other 5' high maximum wall propased to
enclose a courtyard adjacent to the mas�er bath would provide security and privacy for
the residents as large windows overlook the e�cist�ng living spaces and proposed pool
and deck area and it replaces a previously existing wall that was Iocated further out
from the residEnce. This proposed con£iguration would Ieave more open space between
the residence and the proposed pool area.
B. T'he development plan substantially preserves the naturai and
undeveloped state of the Iot because the new improvements will not cause the lot to
look overdeveloped. The proposed development will be located on an area �hat is
already flat, adjacent to the great room where the indoor pool was demolished.
Significant pox�tions of the 4.� acre lot wril be left undeveloped so as to maintain open
space on the properfy. The na�ture, candition, and development of adjacent uses,
bui�dings, and structures and �he topography of the lot have been considered, and th�
construction will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses,
Reso, 2Q1b-17
27 Crest Road West
buildings, or structures because the proposed improvernents will be constructed on a
porfion o£ the lot which is �east intrusive to surroundxng properties, will be screened
and Iandscaped with plants and shrubs, is o£ sufficient distance from nearby residences
so that the proposed project will not i.�npact the view or privacy of surrounding
neighbors.
C. The proposed deveZopment, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and
mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The proposed
project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood, as it is on a Iarge lot. The lo�
coverage maximums set forth in the Zoning Code wil.l not be exceeded.
D. The development plan follows nafiural contouxs of the site to the
maximum extend p�racticable to accomplish groomed and usable areas o£ the lot.
Natural drainage courses will not be affected by the project. Grading wi11 not modify
existing drainage channels no�r redirect drainage flow. The projecf is not locafed in a
canyon or on existing slopes that exceed 25%.
E. The p�roject preserves much of the existing vegetation elsewhere on the lof
and will introduce drought-tolerant landscaping, which is compafiible with and
enhances the rural character of the community, and �he landscaping w�ll provide a
buffer or transition area befween private and public a�reas. A landscaping pIan has been
filed with the City.
F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because flie proposed
development wi11 utilize fhe existing driveway.
Section 6. Sections 17.38.Q10 through 17.38A�0 of the Rolling Hi11s Municipal
Code permit �pproval of a �7ariance gran�ng relief frorn ihe standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extrao�rdinary
circumstances applicable to the properEy prevent the owner from making use of a parcel
of property to the same exfent enjoyed by similar prope:rties in the same vicinity or
zone. In pxoposing walls that do not average out to 2.5' high Variances are required to
�ant relie�from Section 171b.190F for walls. Two nr�a�cixnum 5' high wa11s that will not
average out to 2.5` high are proposed. One 5' maximum high wall encloses the pooi
equipment and one 5' maximum high wall provides privacy to the master bath
courtyard.
With respect to the aforemen�ioned requests far Variance, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional circumstances and conditions on the subject
property as follows:
Reso. 2016-17
27 Cxest Road West
Regarding requested variance frorn Zoning Ordinance Section 17.16.190F
relating to walls nof averaging out to 2.5' feet in height, the wall to enclose the area for
the paol equipment is proposed in an area that has fwo existing 5 -6 ' walls already and
is in a depressed area, away from the primary living area. A lesser wall would not
adequately screen the pool equipment. The other 5' high maximum wa11 proposed to
enclose a courtyard adjacent to the master bath would provide security and privacy for
the residents as large windows overlook the �xisting Iiving spaces and proposed pool
and deck area.
The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other prapex�ty owners in the same vicinity and zone but
which is denied to the prope:rty in question by s�rict application of the code. The
property right which otherwise would be enjoyed is the ability to adequately screEn fhe
pool �quipment in a Iocation thaf would ensure noise is buffered, and to ensure privacy
for the residents and their gues�s from the master bathroom.
B. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or inJurious to the properties or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located in that the degree of deviation from the allowed
average of walls is relatively minor because the walls are very short in length and do
not span over a large area. Further, the proposed improvements would not be visible
from the adjoining street or private p�operties and therefore are not expected to result
in any visua� or privacy impacts. The pool equipment area is tucked away and will not
be visible by residents or neighbors. The privacy wa11 will be screened with
landscaping.
C. In granting ot the Va�iance fhe spirit and intent of the Zoning Qrdinance
wi11 be observed in that the proposed walls construction w:ill be ordexly, attractive, and
will nat �.ff�ct the rural character of �hhe communily. The subject proposed st-ructures
are in the rear of the property and will not impact the proposed future stable and
corral area and will not impact the use of the existing structi.ires.
D. The Variance reques� is consistent with the General Plan of the City of
Roiling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan
requirement of low profile, low-density residenfial development with sufficient open
space between surraund�irtg structures. The px�operty is IocatPd. abave the adjacent
property to rear and due to the large size of the properties and s�oped conditions there
is Iarge open space befween arty structures on subject property and the adjacent
properties.
E. The Variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles
Hazardous Waste Management PIan relating to siting and szting criteria for hazardous
waste facilities.
Reso. 2016-17
27 Crest Road West
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Plaruung Commission
hereby approves the Site PIan Review and Variance in Zoning Case No. 906 for new
1,375 square foot pool with infinity edge, with several terraced retaining walls ranging
from 1' to 4'8" high for pool area, associated grading totaling 388 cubic yards, 64 square
feet of pool equipment enclosed with 5' high maxunum wa11, and a 5' high wall fo
enclose a master bath courtyard for privacy, a 68 square foot barbecue structure and a
40 square foot fire pit subject to the£ollowing condi�ions:
A. 'The Site Plan and Variance approvals shall expire within t�wo years from
the effective dafe of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not
commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.38.070 and 17.46.080 of
the Rolling Hills Mun;icipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended
pursuant to the requirements of these sectiox�s.
B. It i.s declared and made a condition of the approval, that i� any conditions
thereof axe violated, this approval sha1.1 be suspended and the privileges granted
thereunder sha111apse; provxded that the City has given the applican�.s written notice to
cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested,
has been held, and thereafter fhe applicant fails to correct �he violation within a period
of�hirty {30) days from�he date of the Cxty's defermina�ion.
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning
Ordinance, LA County Building Code and of the zone in which the subject properfy is
located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Perm.it, or shown
otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substan�ial conformance
with the site plan on £ile dated May 11, 20�6, and a concept landscaping plan, with
condi�ian to retain ce�rtain vegeta�ion, and dated N�ay 11, 2016 except as otherwise
p�ovided in these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and
Safefy for plan check review must conform with the developrnent plan approved with
this application. A copy of the conditions of this Reso2ution sha1.I be printed on plans
approved when a building permit is issued and a copy of such approved plans,
including conditions of approval, shall be available on the building site at all times.
F. Prior ta obtaining a bui�ding permit a detailed Iandscaping plan shall be
submitted to the Plax�ning Department. Ta maximum extent practicable, the existing
trees and shrubs shall remain, a�be replaced.
G. If landscaping of 5,000 square £oot area or greater is introduced or
redeveloped, the Iandscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the Cit-�s Water
Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Any plants introduced for this project shall nof graw
Reso. 2016-17
27 Crest Road West
i.nto a hedge but be offset. The Iandscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent
feasible, plants that are native to the area and are consistent with the rural character o£
the community.
H. A drainage plan shall be prepared and submitted fa the City's Buzlding
Department for revxew and approval, and the project shall comply with their
requirements. The applicants, af all times, shall rnaintazn the drainage devices in good
working condition and free of debris and vegetation.
I. A licensed professional preparing construction plans €or this project for
Building Departrnent xeview shall execute a Certificafe affirming that the plans conform
in all respects with this Resolution approving this project and including conformance
with a11 of the conditions set forth therein and the City's Building Code and Zoning
�rdinance.
Further, the person obtaining a building permi.t for this project shall execute a
Certificate of Construction stating that the projec�will be constructed according to this
Resolu�ion and any plans approved therewith.
J. Gxading for this project shall not exceed 388 cubic yards which includes 260
cubic yards of excavation from�h.e swimming pool that may be exported.
K. Structural Iot coverage sha1.I no� exceed 27,373 square feef, or 16.1%
{with allowable deductions). Total lat coverage shall not exceed 30.4% or 5Q,464 square
fee�, as approved by this Variance. Building Pad coverage on the 74,316 square �oot
residential pad shall not exceed 25.8%.
L. Disturbance for the pool/spa, barbecue, fire pit, walls, and fixture
pr�posed stable/cox�ra�will no�exceed 56,41'7 square feet�r 33.9%
M. The future set-aside area for the stable and corral area of mini.mum of
1,000 square feet, shall be retained on the property at all times.
N. A minimum of four-foot level path and/or walkway, which does not
have to be paved, shall be provided around the perimeter of the project.
O. The pool equipment area shall be enclosed. Per LA County Building
Code, pool barrier/fencing shall be required for the pool.
P. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements, stormwater pollution preven�ion practices, caunty and local
oxdinances and engineering practices so that peopie or property are nat exposed to
undue vehic�.e tr�ips, noise, dust, and objectionable odoxs shall be required.
Reso. 201b-17
27 Crest Road West
Q. During and after construction, all parking shall �ake place on the project
site and there shall be no parking on the common driveway. During const�ruction, to
maximum extend feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City.
R. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related t�raffic noise throughout the day between fhe
hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when consi�uction and
mechanical equipment noise is perrnitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet
residential environment of the City of Rolling Hil.ls.
S. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management
Practices {BNIl''s} requiremen�s related fo solid was�e, drainage and storm water
mana gemenf.
T. A rnin;n,um of 50% of the construction material spoils shall be recycled
and diverted. The hauler shall provide the appropriate documentation to the City.
U. The project must be �reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Associatzon {RHCA) Architectu.ral Review Committee prior to the issuance
of building permit. Perimeter easements and trails, if any, sha11 remain free and clear of
any improvements inciuding,but no�be limited to fences-including construction fences,
any hardscape, driveways, landscaping, irriga�ion and drainage devices, except as
otherwise approved by the RHCA.
V. The contractor shal.l not use tools that could produce a spark, incIuding
for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can
be found at: http//www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/rnain.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIRE.
It is the sole responsibility oF the proper�y owner as�d/or his/her contractor ta �norutor
the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if work is ta
be conducted on the property, the contractox shall have readily available fire
distinguishe�r.
W. All requirements of the Building and Construction Code, the Zoning
Code, and of the zone in which the subject property is Iocated must be complied with.
The applicant shall comply with all requirements o� fhe Lighti.ng Ordinance of the City
of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190 E), pertaixning to lighting on said property
X. Prior to finaling of the project an "as graded" and an "as constructed"
plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building
Departrnent to ascertain that the completed projec�t is in cornpliance with the approved
plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be
depicted on the"as built/as graded" p1an.
Reso. 2016-17
27 Crest Road West
Y. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of ali conditions
of this approval, the approvals shall not be effec�ive. Such af£idavit shall be recorded
fogether with the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19th DAY OF JULY 2026.
B F, CHAI AN
ATTEST:a
HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK
Ariy action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the
public hearing on fhis application must be filed within the time limifi.� set forth in
section 17.�4,070 of the Rolling Hi11s Municipal Code and Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.b.
Reso. 201b-17
27 Crest Road West
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §�
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
i certify that the fo�regoing Resolution No. 2016-17 entitled:
A RESOLUTI�N OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN 12EVIEW FOR A
SWIMMING POOL/SPA, WALLS, FIRE PIT, BARBECUE, POOL EQUII'MENT,
AND A VARIANCE TO EXCEED 2.5' HIGH AVERAGE FOR ASSOC�ATED
WALLS IN ZONING CASE NO. 906 AT 27 CREST ROAD WEST, {LOT 174-B-
MS), ROLLING HILLS, CA (GOLDENBERG).
was approved and adopted at a regtilar meeting of the Planning Commission on
Ju1y 19,2016 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissionexs Cardenas, Gray and Chairman Chelf.
NOES: 1Vone.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Kirkpatrick.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the foliowing:
Administrative Offices.
HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK
Reso. 2016-17
27 Crest Road West