2016-18 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLZNG HILLS GRANTING APP120VAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW STNGLE FANIILY RESIDENCE, GARAGE AND
A BASEMENT, SWIMMING POOL, VARI4US OUTDOOR AMENITIES AND
VARIOUS RETAINYNG WALLS, A NEW DRIVEWAY AND GRADZNG;
REQUEST FOR VARIANCES TO ENCROACH WITH THE RESIDENCE,
BASEMENT, LIGHT WELLS A1�TD SEVERAL WALLS INTO SETBACKS, �F
WHICH S4ME DO NOT AVERAGE OUT TO 2.�' IN HEIGHT, TO LOCATE
THE POOL, POQL EQUIPMNENT AND FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL IN
FRONT YARD AREA, TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED T�TAL LOT
COVERAGE AND DISTURBED AREA, TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
PERNIITT'ED COVERAGE OF FRONT SETBACK WITH THE DRIVEWAY AND
T� EXPORT DIRT IN ZONING CASE NO. $95, AT 10 BOWIE ROAD, (LOT 4-
CRA), ROLLING HILLS, CA (PANG JUI YIU).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF R4LLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Pang Jui Yiu with respect to real
property located at 10 Bowie Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 4-CRA) requesfiing a szte plan review to
construct a new 5,270 square foat single family residence, 844 square £oot garage, 550 square
feet covered porches, 9$ square foot entryway, 6,000 square foot basement, 640 square foot
swirnming pool and spa, outdoor kitchen, various retaining walls, ranging from 6" curb to 5'
in height, with mostly 3' and 4` high walls, service yard, entryway, covered porches, outdoor
kitchen, a new 400' long by 20' wide driveway and grading af 8,946 cubic yards o£ dixt, of
which 8,360 cubic yaxds wi1l be exported. Variances are requested to encroach with the
residence, basement, two light wells,service yard, several of the walls over 3' in height into the
required setbacks, to locate a portion of �he swimming pool and pool equipment area, the set
aside area for a stable and portion of the corral in frant yard and a portion of the corral within
£�ront yard setback; to exceed the maxunum pernv.tted total lot coverage and disturbed area of
the net lot; ta construct walls that do not average out to 2.5' in height, to exceed the maximum
permitted coverage with a driveway of the front setback {21.2%) and to export dixt off site.
Sec�ion 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to
consider the application at their regular meeting on December 15, 2015 and at the request of
the applicants the case was continued £ox several months to May 17, 2Q16, a� which fime the
Planning Commission visited the site to view the silhouette of the project and held a meeting
in �the evening on May 17. At the May 17, 2Q16 meetings, the Planning Comnlission and the
neighbors expressed concerns with the project and the applicant revised the project to address
their concerns and a revised proJect was reviewed at a public hearing held on June 21, 2016.
Neighboxs within 1,Q00-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and notices were
pub�ished in the Peninsula News on May 5, 2016, June 9, 2Q16 and July 7, 2016, The applicant
and his agents were notified of the public hearings in writing by £irst class mail and the
applicant's agents were in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented from
10 Bowie Rd. �
all persons interested in affecting said proposal, and frorn mernbers of the City staff. Once the
project was revised, there were no abjections to the project. T`he Planning Comrnission have
reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal.
Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the lot area excluding the roadway
easement is 1.6 acres. For development pu�rposes the net lot area of the lot is 59,37b square feet
or 1.36 acres. The existing 3,506 square foot ho�xse and 703 square feet detached garage and a
gazebo will be demolished. The existing house encroaches �,110 square feet and up to 28' into
the rear yard. There are some existing retaining walls thaf will remaiil including a 7-foof tall
wa11 thaf i.s within the rear yard setback and which has nonconforxning status. That wall will
not be altered or extended but will be maintained at the existing height.
Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3
Exemption, and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the
Caiifornia Environmenfal Quality Act.
Section 5. Section 17.46.030 requires a developmenf pIan to be submitted for Site
P1an Review and approval before any grad'zng requiring a grading permit or any new bui�ding
or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, altera�ion or repair to existing
buildings rnay be made which involve changes to grading or an increase ta the size of the
building or structure by 999 square feet or more in any thirty-six (3b} manth period. With
respect to the Site PIan for gradin� the new residence, garages, porches, swimming pool/spa,
retaining wa1ls, driveway and other miscellaneous structures, the Planning Commission
makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance and surraunding uses because the proposed structures comply wi�h the General
Plan requirement of low profile, Iow-densit�r resid�ntial development with sufficient open
space betvveen surrounding structures and maintaining sufficient setbacks to provide buffers
between residential uses. The project is situated on a large, but topographzcally is constraint;
however the development would not cause the lot to be overdeveloped. The existi�g residence
encroaches into the rear setback. The proposed project would encroach less than the existing
residence. The proposed project is situated away from the xoad so as �o reduce the visual
impact of the development. The project conforms with Zoning Code structural caverage
requirements, however due to the Fire Department requirement for a new driveway, the total
1ot coverage {hardscape and structuxes) exceeds the maximum permitted. The net Iot area of
the Zot is 59,376 square feet. The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 13.5%, which
includes all of the structures, with allowance for permitted deductions, (20% max. permitted);
anci the total 1ot coverage proposed, including the future stable would be 37.6%, {35°� max.
permitted). The 1ot was mostly disturbed when it was developed and when Bowie Road was
created and is currently over 91% disturbed. The disturbed area of the lot is proposed to
increase by 2.5% for a total af 94%.
B. The project substaxttially preserves the natu�al and undeveloped state of the Iot
by rn.inimizing building coverage. The topography and the configuration of tihe lot, have been
considered, and it was determined that the proposed development will not adversely affect or
be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures, because the proposed
10 Bowie Rd. 2
px�oject will be constructed largely on an e�cistzng building pad, will be the least intrusive to
surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with txees and shrubs, is of sufficient
distance frorn riearby residences so that it will not impact fhe view or privacy of surrounding
neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious
infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. The lot wi�l no� be built up or
raised to accommodate the developmen�, but will utilize to the maximum extent practicable
the existirtg topography. The grading for the driveway will follow the topography.
C. The p�oposed development, as condxtioned, is harmonious in scale and mass
wi�h the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new
residences in the vicinity of said lot. Significant portions of the Iot will be left undeveloped.
The project will be screened from the road and all neighbors.
D. The development plan will introduce additional landscaping, which is
cornpatible with and enhances the rural character of the cornmunity, and the Iandscaping will
provide a buffer or transition area between privafe and public areas.
E. The proposed development i.s sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience
and safety of circulafion for pedestrians and vehicles because the project will capture all
resident and visitor parking on-site with guest parking spaces on the £ire turn around area and
in the garage. The applicants will continue to utilize the existing driveway approach to the
residence, but widen it by 6' and construct a new driveway along the front of the parcel.
F. The project conforms to the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and is exempt pursuant to Section 1�303 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Section 6. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38A�0 0£ the Rolling Hills Municipal Code
permit approval o� a Variance granting relief from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circuntistances applicable to the property
prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of properfy �o the same extent enjoyed by
sirnilar properties in the same vzcutity or zone.
The foliowing Variances from the RHMC are required:
Sec�ions 17.16.190F - the project exceeds the allowed maxunum pexmitted average of walls
heigh�of 2.5-feef, and walls in setbacks
Section 17.16.070 - the maximum permitted disturbance of�he lat will exceed 4Q% and w�ll be
at 94%, whereas the existing disfixrbance is at 91.�%; and the total lot coverage wilI exceed the
maximum permitted covexage of 35% and will be 37.b%
Section17.12.19Q Setbacks; portion of�he :residence and basement, iight wells, walls, trash area,
entry porch and portion of the future eorral wi11 be located in setbacks
Section 17.7.6.150, the new driveway will cover more than 2Q% of �he front setback, (21.2% of
front setback)
Section 17.12.25Q Yards;the pool, pool equipment fiiture stable and corral will be Iocated in the
front yard area of the�ot
Section 15.04.150 Balanced Cut and Fill Ratio; 8,2b0 cubic yards of dirt will be exported, of
which 4,403 c.y is allowed to be exported, the remainder requires a variance.
10 Bowie Rd. 3
Wifh respecf to the aforementioned requests for Variances, the Planning Commission
finds as follaws:
A. There are exceptional circumstances and conditions on the subject property as
follows:
Regarding requested variance relating to the height and encroachment into the
sefibacks with the proposed retaining walls, some of which do nof average out to 2.5' in height
the lox�gest retaining walls in the front are necessary for the construction of the driveway. The
configuration of the Iot is such that the existing driveway does not meet the Fire Depa�rtrnent
requirements and a new driveway rnust be built. The topography of the lot in the area along
the front is steep and in order to avoid additional grading the walls are necessary. The
retaining wall in the rear is necessary so that the building pad could be kept at its existing
elevation and no� be raised, but yet a11ow a larger than existing house to be built on the lot.
The sloping condition at the rear of the lot in this area makes a retaining wa�I necessary to
protect the proposed residence. There already exists a retaining wall that supporfs the rear
slope and the new wall will aid in this respect. AI of the refaining walls will match the sloped
topogxaphy,will blend in with the natu�ral slope and will not be seen frorri the sixeet.
Regarding the requested variances from Section 17.1b.070, relating to maximum
structural coverage Iimi.ts and disturbance of the lot: the property is uniquely constrained by
the steep topography both at the front and the rear of the building pad. The Iot coverage is
relatively small compared to the amount of coverage that is associated wi�h the
improvements, speci£ically the proposed driveway, which is necessary to meet the Fire Code
standards. The proposed additional distu�rbance to provide a slightly larger building pad and
to exceed the maximum permitted total lot coverage is mostly due to the requirement for the
driveway and is minimal and will result in better vehicle access. The lot has been previously
graded and dist�rbed to over 91%, when the road (Bowie Rd.) and tlie equestrian trail Iocated
along the westerly property line were graded out and const�ructed. To the maximum extent
practicable the proposed development works within and follows the existing conditions on
the lot.
Regarding the reques�ed variances from Sections 17.12.190 encroachment into
setbacks; 17.16.150 coverage with driveway; and 17.12,250 Front ya:rds; the encroachments is
minimal given the configuration and �opography of the lot. 4ver 1,100 square feet o£ the
existing:residence encroaches up to 28` into the rear setback and the new reszdence will lessen
this condition where 1,Qb4 square £eet of the residence will encroach up to 1$.�' into the rear
setback. Due to the configuration and topography of the lot, without more grading of �he
hillsides, there is no other area to place a pool, future a:rea �ox stabYe and corral and the
driveway, than the front of the residence or in setbacks. The steepness and configuration of the
Iot makes it impossib�e to xneet the code requirement and provide for a reasonable size house
on the Iof. In genera�, the existing residence encroaehes into the rear yard setback and the
requested encroachment is less than the e�cisting. The topography of the lot, specifically the
steep slopes, paired with the applicants' desire to �ninimize grading by utilizing the existing
residential pad, create difficulty in�remaining outside of the setbacks.
10 Bowie Rd. 4
Regarding the requested variance from Sec�ion 15.(}4.150 Balanced Cut and F�11 Ratio
where 8,360 cubic yards of dxrt will be exported, 4,303 cubic yards of dirt will be generated
from the excavation of the basement and swimrning poo1,which is allowed to be exported. The
addxtiona14,057 cubic yards, which is to be exported, is necessary in order to no� to raise the
bu�ding pad. To keep the dirt on site would rnean raising the building pad and/or the
steepness of the slopes, which in turn would require a variance far slopes of over 2:1 grade.
Due to the already steep slopes surrounding the building pad and the neighbors' desire to not
to raise the pad, it is necessary to export the dirt.
B. The variances are necessary fo�r the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zane but which is
derued to the property in question by strict applica�ion of the code. The property right which
otherwise would not be enjoyed is the ability to utilize a portion of the front yard and
se�backs for superior access and entry/exit than currently exists and which meets the Fire
Code, as well as nat to subsfantially change to exiting topography and configuration of the
lot.
C. The granting ot the Variances would no� be materially detrimenfal to the public
we�fare or injurious to the properties or improvements in such vicinity and zon� in which the
property is Iocated in that the proposed reconfiigured driveway access increases safety to the
property. Addxtionally, the improvements to the property will nat be easily viewed fram
adjacent properties, and �he street and visual impacfis are xninor. To the maximum extent
practicable the proposed developmenf warks within and follows the existing conditions on
�ie Iot and therefore will not be materially or otherwise detrimental to the public. The projecf
would not affect any neighbor s views and therefore would not affect property values, and
would be screex�ed from the street.
D. In granting of the Va�iances the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be
observed in that the proposed driveway, retaining walls, and the new residential construction
will be orderly, atfractive, and while it encroaches into the rear setback, it will be buffered and
mediated with landscaping and a wall to ensure it will not affect the r�ral character of the
community. The subject property retains a suitable stable and corral set-aside area and the
development will not impact use of the set aside for stable and corral.
E. The Variances request are consisfent with the General Plan of the City o£Rolling
Hills because the proposed structures comply with the Genera� Plan requirement of low
pro£ile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding
structures.
F. The proposed development is sensztive and not detrimental to the convenience
and safety of circulation fox pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed development will
utilize the existing driveway approach, however, the new driveway will comply with the Fire
Code requirements and will be Iong and wide to accommodate emergency vehicles and where
no cars would need to be parked in the roadway easements.
10 Bowie Rd. 5
G. The Variances are consistent with the portions of the Counfy of Los Angeles
Hazardous Waster Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria far hazardous waste
facilities.
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby
approves Zoning Case No. 895 a Site Plan Review for grading, for a new residence with a
basement and garage, new pool/spa, covered porch, new driveway, site retaining walls that
exceed 3 feet in height; and Variances to encroach with a portion of the residence, basement,
retaining walls and light we11s into setbacks and with pool, spa and future stable/corral into
the front yard area; to exceed the maximum permitted dishzrbance and total lot coverage, to
exceed coverage of fhe front setback with a driveway, to exceed 2.�' high walls on the ave�age
and to export di.rt subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan and Variances approvals shall expire within two years fro�n the
effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.46.0$0 and 17.38,070, unless otherwise
extended pursuant to the requirements of this section.
B. Zt is declared and made a condition of this approval that if any conditions thereof
are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall
lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the
opportunity for a heax�ng has been provided, and if requested,has been held, and thereafter the
applicant fails to cor�rect the violation within a period of thirty (30} days fram the date of the
City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, fihe Zoning
Ordinance, and of the zone zn which the subject prope:rty is iocated must be complied with
unf.ess otherwise set forth i.n this permit, or shown otherwxse on an approved plan.
D. The Iot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the
site plan on file dated July Z3, 2016 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The
working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review
shall conform to the approved development plan. A11 conditions of the Site Plan Review and
Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit woxking drawings and
where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from �the
building depariment.
T'he conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto building plans submitted to
the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at a�1�imes.
E. Prior to submittal of fina� working drawings fo the Building and Safety
Depart�nent for issuance of building pexmits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to
City staff for verifzcation thaf fhe final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the
Planning Comi.nission.
F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building
Deparhnent review shall execute a Certificate affirxning that the plans conform in all respects
10 Bowie Rd. �
to this Resolution approving this project and alI o£ the canditions set fo:rth therein and the
City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance.
Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading pernlit for this project shall
execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according �o
this Resolution and any plans approved therewith.
G. Structural Iot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 8,11b square£eet or 13.5% of the
net lot area, (with allowed deductions) in conformance with Iot coverage limitations (20%
maxunum}.
The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwark sha11 not exceed 22,466
square feet or 37.6% af the net Iof ar�a, which includes the driveway.
H. Grading for this project shall consist of 8,946 cubic yards of cut and 293 cubic
yards of fill with 8.360 cubic yards to be exported. The disturbed area o£ the lot, including the
future stable and corral area shall not exceed 94%.
F. The residential building pad shall be 14,708 square £eet and wfll have coverage
of 48.5%.
J. 1,060 square feet of the new residence and at the basement may encroach up to
�8.5' into the rear setback.
K. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of tlie Lighting ardinance of
the City of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.19Q E), pertaining to Iighting on said property, roofing
and maferia�requirements of properties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.
L. All utiIity lines to the development shall be placed underg�ound, subject to all
applicable standards and requirements.
M. A drainage plan, as required by the Buxlding Departmen� shall be prepared and
approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construc�ion pexmit. Such plan sha1l be subject to
LA County Code requirements.
N. All graded slopes shall be Iandscaped. Prior to obtairung a building permit, a
landscaping plan sha1.1 be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel
Modification requirements and for graded slopes. Prior to finaling the project, trees and shrubs
shali be planted �o screen the pr�ject from the neighbors. Any shrubs and trees sha11 not foxm a
hedge like screen but be offset arid they shall be o#' a height, which shall not at any time grow
into residents' view. The landscaping p1an sha11 utilize to the maximum ex�ent feasible, plants
tha�are native to the area and are consistent with the rural character of the community.
If Iandscaping of 5,a00 square foot area or greater is int�roduced or redevelop, the
landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City's Water E£ficient Landscape
Ordina�.zce.
10 Bowie Rd. '7
O. The povl and pool equipment area shall be screened with landscaping. Per LA
County Building Code, pool barrier/fencing shall be required. The swimming pool and the
spillway shall utilize the most quiet and technologically advanced equip�nent to dampen the
sound.
P. The west and south side setback lines in the vicinity of the construction for �his
project shall remain staked throughout the construction. A construction fence may be
required.
Q. The project must be revzewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community
Associa�ion (RHCA) Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permit.
Perimeter easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements
includin� but not be limited to fences-including construction f ences, any hardscape,
driveways, landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, except as otherwise approved by
RHCA.
R. A rn�nirnum of 50% of any construction materials must be recycled or diver�ed
from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City's Constru.c�ion and Demolifion
permit for waste hauling prior to start of work, and provide the appropriate documenfafi.on to
the City.
S. During construction, the prope�rty owners sha11 be required to schedule and
regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM
and 6 PM, Monday through Safu�day only, when construcfion and mechanical equipment
noise is pernlitted, so as not to interfere with the q�iet residential environment of the City of
Rolling Hills.
T. The contYactor shall not use tools that cou�d produce a spax�k, xncluding for
clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found
at: htt��._.va��.�hA�tc�_.__��_�� m���� ?�����������—��-��°�°�������������I��. It
is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/he:r contractor to monitar the red
flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if work is to be conducted
on the property,the con�,ractor sha11 have readily available fire distinguisher.
U. During construc�ion, all paxking shall take place on the project site and, if
necessary, any averflow parking shall take place withxn nearby �mproved roadway
easement adjacent to subject s�te. There sha11 be no blocking of adjacent driveways or blocking
of the trail. During constructzon a flagrnen shall be used to direct traffic when it is anticipated
that a lane may be impedea.
V. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Aegionai Water
Quaiity Control Board and Caunty Public Works Department Best Management Practices
(BMP's} requi�rements related to solid waste, drainage and storm water manager�ient and
comply with the Cify's Low Impact developrnent Ordinance (LID). Further the property
owners sha11 be required to conform to the County Health Department requirements for a
septic system.
10 Bowie Rd. g
X. Prior to finaling of the project an "as graded" and an "as constructed" plans and
certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Departmen� to
ascertain tha�the completed project is in compliance with�.ie approved plans. In addition, any
modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicfed on the "as built/as
graded" plan.
Y. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this
perxnit pursuanf to Zoning Ordinance, or the approval shall not be e£fective. 'The affidavit shall
be recorded together with the resolution.
PASSED, A VE D DO E THIS 19TH DAY OF JULY 20�6.
�
B F, CHA AN
ATTEST:
HEIDI LUCE,CITY CLERK
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made a.s a result af the public
hearing on this application must be filed within the �ime limits set forth in Section 17.54.07Q af
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
10 Bowie Rd. 9
STATE OF CALIFORNiA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §�
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2036-18 entit�ed:
A RESOLUTION �F THE PLANNIlVG COMMISSI�N OF THE CITY �F
ROLLING HILLS GRAN'fING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW STNGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, GARAGE AND
A SASEMENT, SWIMNIING POOL, VARIOUS OUTDOOR AMENTTIES AND
VARIOUS RETAINfNG WALLS, A NEW DRIVEWAY AND GRADING;
REQUEST FOR VARIANCES TO ENCROACH WITH THE RESIDENCE,
BASEMENT, I,�GHT WELLS AND SEVERAL WALLS INTO SETBACKS, OF
WHICH SOME DO NOT AVERAGE OUT TO 2.5' IN HEIGHT, TO LOCATE
THE PO4L, POOL EQUIPMNENT AND FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL IN
FRONT YARD AREA, TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERNIIT'fED TOTAL LOT
COVERAGE AND DISTURBED AREA, TO EXCEED THE MAXIlVIUM
PERMITTED COVERAGE OF FRONT SETBACK WITH THE DRTVEWAY AND
TO EXPORT DIRT IN ZONING CASE NO. 895, AT 10 BOWIE ROAD, {LOT 4-
CRA}, ROLLING HILLS, CA (PANG JUI YIL�.
was approved and adopted at regulax meeting of the P�anning Commission on July 19,
2p�6 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Comrrtissioners Cardenaso Cxay,Kirkpatrick and Chairman Chelf.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and ui compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
, *
�
HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK
l.a Bawie Rd. 10