Loading...
1188 RESOLUTTON N0. 118$ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 4F ROLLING HILLS UPHOLDING THE PLANNIlVG COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESTDENCE WITH A BASEMENT, DETACHED GARAGES, COVERED PORCHES, STABLE, SWIMMING POOL WITH A SPA, RETAINING WALLS AND NEW DRIVEWAY; A CONDITTONAL USE PERMIT TO C4NSTRUCT A GUEST HOUSE, DETACHED GARAGES, AND STABLE iNTTH LOFT; AND r- VARIANCES TO EXCEED MAXIMUM PERMITTED AVERAGE HEIGHT OF RETAINING WALLS AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMI'ITED LOT DISTURBANCE IN ZOIVING CASE NO. 901 AT 5 PINE TREE LANE, (LOT 94- R�, (SHARNG}. THE CITY C�UNCIL DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND�RDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Ms. Lauren Sharng to request a Site Plan Review for the construction of a new 5,250 square faot residence, with a �,250 square foot basemen�, 1,115 square feet of detached garages (714 and 441 square feet each), 1,445 square fee� covered porches including 520 square feet at the stable, 964 square £oot swimmir�g pool and spa, 50 square foot pool equipment, 3Q0 square foot service yard, 275 square foot entryway, retaining walls, new driveway, 350 square foot outdoor kitchen, and grad�ing for a total of 4$,150 cubic yards of dirt (11,775 c.y. cut and 11,775 c.y. fill; 12,300 c.y, over-excavation and 12,300 c.y. re-compaction}. The applicant also requests a Conditional Use Permit to construct an S00 square foot guesthouse, the de�ached garages, and 1,$ZO square foot stable with 611 square foot loft; and Variances to exceed the ma.ximum permitted average height of retaining walls and ta exceed the maximum pern�utted disturbed area of the 1ot. Section 2. The Planning Cominission adopted Resolution No. 20].6-15 approving the _. project on June 21, 20�.6 and the City Cauncil received and fi�ed a report in this case an July 11, 2016. Chapter 17.54 0� the Municipal Code sets the process for appeals of the Planning Cornmi.ssion decision to the City Cou�cil. Anyone may appeal a decision of �he Planning Com�ussion within 30-days of the Comrnission action. On Ju1y 21, 201b an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision was filed to the City Council. On August S, 2Q16 �.he Ci�ty Councii held a duly noticed de novo public hearing in Zoning Case No. 901, and after discussion and consideration, directed staff to prepare a Resolution upholding the Planning Commission's action. Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-2 and the gross lot area is �.15 acres. The net lot area is 4.3 acres or �87,196 square feet. The existing property is current�y developed with a single -family residence, garage, and swimming pool, which will be demolished. Access to the property is taken from a joix�t driveway appraach with 3 Pine Tree Lane. A Condition of Approval is for the applicant to abandon their portion of the joint driveway once their new driveway is constructed and remove #he concre�e, but retain and not affect the access serving 3 Pine Tree Lane. Section 4. The City Council finds that the project is exempt from �he California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 {new construction of single family residence and accessory structures), and Section 15061{b}(3) (common sense exemption) of the CEQA guidelines. Section 5. Section 17.46.03Q requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and appraval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any�ew building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes �o grading or an increase to the size of the building ar sixuc�ure by not more than 999 square feet in any thirty-six (3b) month period. The grrading for the structures (new residence, garages, swimming pool, guest house, and stable) require Site Plan Review due to the fact that they are new stxuctures and per Zoning Code Z7.46.020.A-2. The pool requi�es a Site Plan Review due to the grading required for it under Zoning Code 17.46.Q20.A.2{a) and the size, and the retaining walls require a Site Plan Review due to their height being over 3' in height and over 2.5' average. Resoiution No.12$$-5 Pine Tree Lane 1 With respect to the Site P1an for grading and the proposed structures the City Council makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed developmen� is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the pxoposed s�ructures comply with the General Plan requirement of low pro£ile, law-density reszdential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures and maintaining sufficient setbacks to provide buffers between residential uses. Although the disturbed area exceeds the maximum permitted amount of 40% at 45.2%, a large portion o# it is for the proposed 1,810 square foot stable with 611 square foot loft (which requires a Conditional Use Permit), and the associa�ed 3,900 square foot corral along with the long driveway that is needed to accommodate horse trailers. The stable and corral promote the rural, equesirian aesthetic of Rolling Hi11s. None of the structures are in setbacks. The project confarms to Zoning Code 1at coverage requirements, except for disturbance. The net lot area of the 1ot is 187,196 square feet. The structural net iot coverage is proposed at 12,279 square feet ar 6.56°�, which includes all of the structures, with allowance for permitted deductions, (20% max. perxnitted); and the totallot coverage proposed, including the driveway would be 29,074 square feet or Z5.5°�, (35�o max. permitted). The disturbed area of the lot is proposed to be 45.2%, which exceeds the maximum allowed disturbance of 40% {Municipal Code 17.16.070B). B. The pxojec� substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped s�ate of the lot by minimizing building coverage. The topography and the configuration of the lot have beEn considered, and it was dete�rmined that the proposed development will nat adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacen� uses, buildings, or structures, because the proposed praject will be constructed parkially an the existing building pad of the curren�ly developed lot, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and Iandscaped with trees and shrubs, is of st�fficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrau.nding neighbors, and will allow the owners to enjoy their praperty without deleterious infringement on the rights of surraunding property owners. The proposed project would be located on a gentler slope of the property and leaving the steeper and more densely vegetated areas in their natural state to the north and nor�heast, along wi#h the natural drainage course. The project promotes equestrian uses, there#ore furthering the Cl�'S goal to remain an equestrian community. C. The p�roposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is con.sistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to other residences in the vicinity of said lot as the propased house is 5,250 square feet and the average in the vicinity is 5,149 square feet. The development plan follows the natural contours of the site to minimize grading by utilizing a portion of the existing building pad for the new development. Due to the existing house being located in the setback and easement it is necessary to move the new house and therefore drop the pad elevation in order to achieve the necessary building pad. The residence is proposed on the shallowest slaped area with a basement being added to increase the residence size while reducing the footprint. The slopes being crea�ed have been rounded and it was attempted to animic the existing slope izt the area. The use of reta�ining walls along the upper side of the building pad/back yard, stable and driveway has helped to minimize grading. D. The development pian will introduce additional landscaping, which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and the landscaping will provide a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. There will be some clearing of existing landscaping due to overgrowth and improper maintenance �hat has become a fire hazard. E. The proposed development is sensi�ive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedes�rians and vehicles because the new 20' driveway will be safer to drive on as two caycs can safely pass one another. There is ample parking in the garages and there is a proposed parking pad at the front of the house, outside of all setbacks, as Pine Tree Lane does nat have wide shoulders to park on so a11 visitar parking musf be Resalution No.1188-5 Pine Tree Lane 2 con�ained on site. An adequate driveway is proposed to safely accommodate horse trailers to the stable and corral area. Section b. Sections �7.18.060 and 17.18.090 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a stable over 200 square feet and corral over 550 square feet with a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed 1,810 square foot stable with 611 square foot loft and 3,900 square foot carral comply with a11 requirements of these sections. Twa detached garages are proposed (714 square feet and 441 square feet). Section 17.16.210 (A)(4} of the Zoning Ordinance contains conditioxas for a detached garage(s), subject to approval of a conditional use permit. An $00 square foot guesthouse is proposed. Section 17.16.210 {A}(5) of the Zoning Ordinance contains conditions for a guesthouse, subject to approval of a condi�ional use permit. All of the detached structures comply with the provisions and conditions for such structures. With respect to this request for Conditional Use Permits, the City Council finds as follows: A. Conditionally permitted uses aze not outright permitted by the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. The Commission must consider applications for a Conditional Use Permit and may, with such conditions as are deemed necessary, approve a conditional use which will not �eopardize, adversely a#fect, endanger or to otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfaze or be materially detrimental to the property of o#her persons located in the vicinity of such use. B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the stab�e, carral, detached garages, and guest house would be consistent with the purposes and objec�ives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Pla� because the uses are consistent with simi.lar uses in the community, and meet all the applicable code development standards for a stable and corral, de�ached garages, and gues�house and they are located in areas on the p:roperty that are adequately sized to accammodate such uses. The proposed uses are apprapriately located in that they will be sufficiently separated from nearby structures used for habitation or — containing sleeping quarters. The stable/corral would be constructed in furtherance of the General Plan goal of promoting and encouraging equestrian uses. The de�ached garages are proposed to separate the residential structures from the stable. The proposed guesthouse in a coinmon amenity to Rolling Hills. C. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent strtxctures have been considered, and the project will not adverse�y affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildirigs, or structures because the proposed uses {stable/corral, detached garages, and guest ho�a.se) are located in the middle of a 4.3 acre net lot and their general locations are of sufficient distance from nearby residences so as to not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. The proposed stable is to be located adjacent to the corral and a path designated for equestrian uses that runs from the stable to the driveway is separate from the other outdoor living areas on the proper#y and will be comprised of decomposed granite. The loft area of the stable is directly accessed from the driveway. D. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the na�ural terrain, and surrounding residences because the proposed uses (stable/corrai, deta�hed garages, and guest house) complies with the low profile resident�al development pa.ttern of the coxnmunity and wi11 not give the property an over-built look, and areas will remain open and unobstructed. The 1ot is 4.3 acres net in size and is sufficiently large to accommadate the proposed uses. The stable will be compatible with the uses in the swrraunding area because Rolling Halls is an equest�ri.an cammunity and stables are encouraged. The s�able will look like a stable and the 3,900 square foot corral will promote open space on the pad. The detached garages will be compatible with surrounding uses as they meet the requirements of the City as well as being proportioned to the house size. They wi1l function like garages ar�d not a residential structu.re. The guest house will be compatible with the uses in the surrounding area because it will have the same architectural design as the house and is in the rear yard and is an amenity other residences in Rolling Hills have. Resolution No.II88-5 Pine Tree Lane 3 E. The proposed conditional uses (stable/corral, detached garages, and guest house) complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district and requires Conditional Use Permits pursuant to Sections 17.18.060, 17.18.090, 17.16.21Q(A)(4), and 17.1b.210(A)(5) of the Zaning Ordinance. F. The proposed conditianal uses a�e consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because irhe project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. Section 7. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.05Q of the Code permit approval. of a variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when, due to exceptional or extraordinary circ�mstances applicable to the property and nat applicable to other similar properties in the same zone, strict application o# the Code would deny the prvperty owner substantial property rights enjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity and zane. The applicant seeks a variance from the requirement 17.16.190(F) that walls not exceed five feet or 2.5 feet in average, and from 17.16.070(B} that disturbance be limited to 40% of the net lo� area. The walls do not exceed 5' high rnaximum but they do not average out to 2.5' high and require a variance. The disturban�e is proposed at 45.2°�, which is higher than the permitted 40% due in large part to the proposed long drive�nray. With respect �o this request for Variances,the City Council finds as follows: A. Ther�e axe exceptianal and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or fio the intended use #hat do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because the existing lot, despite ifi being over 5 acres gross, has approximately hal.f of its overall area at a slope of 2:1 or steeper and the remainder undulated and hilly and the Iot requires grading in order to create a sufficient flat area to construct the house and accessory structures. The existing building pad cannot be utilized in i�s entirety for the new development, as most of it is Iocated in the setback. Thexe is a drainage course along the western property Iine, which must also be avoided. In arder to generate the dirt needed for the pad, Xt was necessary to drop the pad and the walls helped to achieve this. However, due to the slope in the rear of th�lot, at�d no grading allowed in tlte Association easements, the average wall height did not average #0 2.5'. The rnajority of the walls will not be visible from the street and will mainly only be seen by the owner as they will be fla.nking the residential pad. The walls for the stable will be visible from the western side. However, there is a steep slope between the walls and the property line along with existing vegetation, which will add additional screening for these walls. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservati.on and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vici�ni.ty and zone, which would be denied to the property in question absent a variance, because the site is sloped in nature so in order to provide a pad fihat meets the development standards, additional grading is required and it was necessary to push the limits of grading farther out than if the lot did not have as much slope to it. The overage is not signi€icant and the property owner shouid not be denied the privilege of a new house because the topographic nature of the lot makes it infeasible to camply strictly with Section 17.16.�70. The exceedance of the dishxrbance is due in large part ta �he proposed driveway. Any concerns vaiced by residents and the City Council during the public hearing were addressed in the revised site pian and during the field visit to the site. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicuuty and zone in which the prope:rty is �ocated. A minor increase in the overall percentage of dis�urbed area on the lot will have no effect on the public welfare or on praperty or irnprovements in the vicinity and the walls which exceed 2.5' average in height are not in any setbacks and will not cause any line of sight issues on Pine Tree Lane due to the rows of existing trees curren�ly in the vicinity. D. The variance does not grant special privileges to the applicant. To the canirary, absent a variance, the property awner would be deprived of the same rights and privileges afforded to other property owners in the vicinity. Unique circumstances applicable to the subject pxoperty anake it ulfeasible for the property owner to comply with Section �716.070. Resolution No.118S-5 Pine Tree Lane 4 The minor overage requested will allow the property owner to enjoy the same rights and privileges afforded to many other properties in the vicinity and zone. E. The variance is consistent with �he portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management PIa� relating to siting and siting cri#eria for hazardous waste facilities. F. The variance request is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project, together with the variance, will be campatible with the objectives, policies, general Iand uses and programs specified in the General Plan and will uphold the Ci#y's goals to protect and promote construction that is rural in nature. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the City Council hereby approves Zor�ing Case No. 901 request £or a Site PIan Review for the construction of a new 5,250 square foot residence, with a 5,250 square foot basement, 1,�15 square fee� of detached garages (714 and 441 square feet each}, 1,445 square feet covered porches including 520 square feet at the stable, 96�4 square foot swirnrni„g pool and spa,50 square foot pool equipment, 300 square foat service yard, 275 square foot entryway, retaining walls, new driveway, 35Q square foot outdoor kitchen, and grading for a total of 48,150 cubic yards of dirt {11,775 c.y. cut, 12,30Q c.y. over excavation, and 11,775 c.y. fill, and 12,30Q c.y. re-eompa�tion); Conditional Use Permit to construct an 80Q square foot guesthouse, the detached garages, and 1,810 square foot stable with 611 square foot loft; and Vaxiances to exceed the maximum permitted average height of retaining wa11s and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot. With the proposed grading, the disturbed area of the lot would be 45.2% subject to �he £ollowing conditions: A. The Site Plan, Conditional Use Perrnits, and Variances approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections I7.46.080, 17.42.070, and 17.38.07Q un�ess otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements o£these sections. B. It is declared and made a condition of this approval that if any conditions thereof a�e viola#ed, this approval shall be suspended and #he privileges granted therevndex shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's detern�ination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless o�herwise set farth in this permit, or shown othErwise on an approved plan. D. The Zot shall be developed and maintained in substaniial conformance with the site plan on file dated July 01, 2016 except as othe�wise provided in �hese conditians. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, atld Variance approvals shall be incorpora�ed into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable cornplied with prior to issuance of a grading or build'zng permit fram the building departrnent. The conditions o#approval of this Resalution sha11 be printed onto building plans submitted to ^ the B�ilding Department for review and shall be kept on site at all tunes. Any rnodifications and/or changes to the approved project, including those resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed and approved by staff prior to implementing the changes. E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Sa£ety Department for issuance of bu�lding permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final pZans are in compliance with the plans appxoved by the City Coucil. F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for �this project for Building Department review sha1l execute a Certifica#e affirming that the plans conform in ail respects Resolution No.1188-5 Pine Tree Lane 5 to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth therein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 12,279 square feet or 6.5b% of the net lot area, in conformance with lat coverage lunitations (2Q% maximum). The total lot coverage proposed, including str�zctures and flatwark, shall no� exceed 29,074 square feet or 1�.5%, of the net lat area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (35% max}. H. Grading for this praject shall not exceed 11,775 cubic yards of cut and 11,T75 cubic yards of fill; 12,300 cubic yards of over-excavation, and 12,30Q eubic yards of recompaction and shall be balanced on site. The disturbed area of the lot, inciuding the approved stable and corral shall not exceed 45.2%. I. The residential building pad �s proposed at 44,100 square feet and shall not exceed coverage of 9,344 square feet ar 21.2% with allowed deductions. The stable pad is proposed at 5,720 square feet and shall nof exceed 2,149 square feet ot coverage or 37.69'o with allowed deductians. J. A new driveway shall be provided per the Fire Department requirements and the apron of�he driveway shall rneet the conditions of approval of the Traffic Commission. Further, the portion of the existing shared dxiveway with 3 Pine Tree Lane that is located on the property af 5 Pine Tree Lane shall be abandoned and the concrete removed ance the new driveway off Pine Tree Lane is completed. At no time shall vehicular access to 3 Pine Tree Lane be impacted by construction activities at 5 Pine Tree Lane. The driveway apron serving 3 Pine Tree Lane, but located on 5 Pine Tree Lane shall be unaf�ected by this developmen� and sha11 be available at a11 times for egress and ingress to 3 Pine Tree Lane. Photographic evidence of the condition of the shared driveway and apron wzth 3 Pine Tree Lane shall be submitted to the Planning Department befare any construction or demolition. Any damage caused to the apron, easements or curbs by construction activities shall be restored at the expense of the applicant. K. A�Cess to the stable and to the carral shall be decomposed granite or like 10Q% pervious roughened material. L. Only one sanitary �acility consisting of a shower, sink, and a toiiet and a kitchenette is pernutted in the guesthouse per Section 17.7.6.210{A}(5)(c). M. A mixiimum of four-foot level path and/ar walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed structures, or as otherwise required by the Fire Department. N. At any time there are horses on the praperty, Best Management Practices {BMPs) shall be applied for manure cont�ol, including but not be limited to removal of the manure on a daily basis or provision of a receptacle with a tight closing lid that is constructed of brick, stone, concrete, metal or wood lined with metal or other sot�.nd material and that is safeguarded against access by flies. The contents of said receptacles shall be removed once a week. It is prohibited to dispose of manure or any animal waste into the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System {MS�), into natural drainage course or spread on the property. O. The poal equipmen# area shall be enclosed and screened with landscaping. Per LA County Building Code, pool barrier/fencing shall be required. P. The applicant shall comply with all requiren�ents of the Lighting Ordinance of the Ci�y of Ro�ling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190 E}, pertaining to lighting on said property, roofing and material requirements of properties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severzty Zone. Resolution No.�288-5 Pine Tree Lane 6 Q. AIl utility lines to the residence, guesthause, detached garages, and stab�e shall be placed underground, subject to alI applicable standards and requ�ements. R. A drainage plan, as required by the Build7irtg Department shall be prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such plan shall be subject to LA County Code requiren�ents. S. All graded slopes sha11 be landscaped. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Depaxtment Fuel Modification requirements and �aded slopes. Prior to finaling the project, trees and shrubs shall be planted to screen the projec�from the neighbors. At time of planting such plants shall be no smalle�r than in 15 ga�lan cantainers, or equivalent. The landscaping shall not form a hedge like screen bu� be offset. The height af any new trees and shrubs, to be planted in conjunction with this project, shall not at any time exceed the ridgeline of the roof of the structures, which they are screening. The landscaping plan shall utilize ta the maximum extent �easible, plants that are nafive to the area, are water- wise and are cansistent with the rural character of the cornmunity. The landscaping shall be subject to the :requirements of the Ci�y's Water E£ficient Landscape Ordinance, (Chapter 13.18of the RHMC}. T. The southerly �roperty line, setback and easemen� Iines and the westexly roadway easement and front setback lines, aZong the limits of the praject, shall be staked throughout the consiruction. A construction fence may be required. U. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trazls, if any, sha11 remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to £ences-including construc�ion fences, any hardscape, driveways, landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, except as otherwise approved by the RaU.img Hi�Is Convnunity Association. V. Minimum of 5p% of any construction materials must be recyc�ed or diverted from landfilis. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City's Construc�ion and Demolition permits#or waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City. W. During construction, conformance wi�h the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and Iocal ordinances and engineering practices so that people or praperty are not exposed to undue vehicle tr�.ps, noise, dust, and objeCtianable odors shall be required. X. During cortstruction, all parking shall take place on the project sxte, on the new driveway arid, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within the unimproved roadway easements on the east side of Pine Tree Lane adjacent ta project site only, and shall not abstruct neighboring driveways. During constructian, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into�he City. Y. During construction, the praperty owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construc�ion and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday on1y, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere wi�h the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Z. The contractor shall not use �ools �hat cou�d produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/�ox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibili.ty of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag wanting canditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if work is to be conducted on the property, the contractar shall have readily available fire distinguisher. AA. The property owners shall be requi�red to conforxn with the Regional Wafer Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) requirernents re7ated to solid waste, drainage and storm water drainage facilities ma�agement and to the City's Low Impact development Ordinance (LID). Further the Resolution No.1188-5 Pine Tree Lane 7 property ownexs shall be requixed to conform to the County Health Department requirements for a septic system. AB. Prior to finaling of the project an "as gxaded" and an "as constiru�ted" plans and certifications, including certifications of ridgelines of the structures, shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Departrnent to ascertain that the completed project is i.n compliance with the approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project d�ring construction, shall be depicted on the"as built/as graded" plan. AC. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this permit pursuant to Zoning Ordinance, or the approval sha1l not be e�fective. The affidavit shall be recorded together with the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND AD�P'TED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2016. r r BEA DIEIZINGER, MA R ATTEST: ��.��� � �:�� �.��.. � � .� �,, �,��., HEIDI LUCE, CTTY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of �he public heaxing on this application must be filed within the tirne limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Muni�ipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1Q94.6. Resolution No.1188-5 Pine Tree Lane 8 STATE OF CALIFORIVIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) �� CZTY�F ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ].�88 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C�UNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS f y UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL O� A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADIlVG AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENCE WITH A BASEMENT, DETACHED GARAGES, COVERED PORCHES, STABLE, SWIMMING POOL WITH A SPA, RETAINING WALLS AND NEW DRIVEWAY; A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A GUEST HOUSE, DETACHED GARAGES, AND STABLE WITH LOFT; AND VARIANCES TO EXCEED MAXIMUM PERMITTED AVERAGE HEIGHT OF RETATNING WALLS AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT DISTURBANCE IN Z4IVING CASE NO. 901 AT � PINE TREE LANE, (LOT 94- RH), {SHARNG). was approved and adopted at regular meeting of the City Council on August 22, 2016 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Coun�ilrnembers Black, Mirsch, Pieper, Wilson and Mayor Dieringer. NDES: None. ABSENT: None. -- ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of Cali�ornia was posted a�the following: Administrative Offices HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK Resolution No.1188-5 Pine Tree Lane 9