Loading...
1202 RESOLUTION NO. 12Q2 A RESOLUTION OF 'TI� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A S�TE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENCE WITH BASEMENT, GARAGES, COVERED PORCHES, SWIMMING POOL WITH A SPA, RETAINING WALLS AND NEW DRIVEWAY; AND REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A GUESTHOUSE AND STABLE WITH LOFT AND CORRAL AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS IN ZONING CASE NO. 902 AT 23 CREST ROAD EAST, LOT 132A-MS, (HYNES). THE PROJECT WAS DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORIVIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA}. THE CITY COUNCiL DOES HEREBY FIlVD, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Initially, in Marck� 2016 an application was duly filed by NIr, and Mrs. James Hynes with respect to reai property lacated at 23 Crest Road East, Rolling Hills {Lot 132A-MS) requesting a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance to allow for the canstruction of a new 11,500 square foot residence and 11,500 square foot bas�ment, two attached garages totaling 1,540 square feet, 900 square foot swimming pool with spa, an 800 square foot guesthouse in the front yard, 7,150 square foot tennis court and related miscellaneous outdoor struchzres all requiring over 62,000 cubic yards of grading. Followimg several public hearings and f eld visits by tl�e Planning Commission and interested members of the public, the applicants scaled down the pro�ect. During the City Councxl proceedings, described below,the applicants fiu�ther scaled down the project. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the applicatian at their regular meeting an April 19, 2Q16, May 17, 2016, and at a fietd visit on May 17, 20�6. Following the May 2016 meeting the applicants scaled dov�m the project by removing the tennis court, relocating the guesthouse, proposing a stable, reducing the grading quantities and disturbance of the Iot, driveway and the size of the residence. Additional public hearings were held on June 21, 2016, July 19, 2016, and at a field trip on July 19, 2016. Throughout the process, neighbors within 1,000-foot radius were notified af the public hearings and a notice was published in the Peninsula News on Aprit 7, 2016 and June 9, 20I b. The applicants and their agents were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the applicants and agents we�re in attendance at the hearings evidence was heard and presented from a11 person interested in affecting said proposaZ, and from members of the City staff. 5ection 3. During the proceedings, the Planning Commission and several neighbors in addition to expressing concerns with the mass of the structures, length of the residence, grad'mg and the impact and aesthetics of the overall development on Crest Road East properties, were concerned with the geology, soil stability, draina.ge and water run-off from the proposed project and its impact on the downhill properties. The City's drainage and grading engineer and the supervising Buildiung and Safety engineer were present at several meetings and addressed the Commission. The applicants revised their drainage plans, provided hydrology study and included cistern system to retain the run-off from the property. Section 4. The Planning Cornmission at their August 16, 2016 rneeting adopted a Resolution ap�roving the revised project. FolIowing Planning Commission approval af the project, the City Council at their September 12, 20I6 took jurisdiction of the project. Pursuant to Section 1'1.54A15 of the Rolling Hi11s Municipal Code, a review hearing for cases taken under jurisdiction by the City Council sha11 be conducted as de novo hearings. Section 5. The City Council conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on October 4, 2016, in the field, at th�ir regularly scheduled meeting on October 10, 2016, and an January 9, 20I7. Neighbors within 1,OOQ-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in Palos Verdes Peninsula News on September 22, 2a16. In addition, the Agenda for City Council's meetings is printed in the City's Newslett�r. The applicants were no�ified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and frorn members of the City staff, City's drainage and grading engineer, neighbors and applicant's engineer and attorney and the City Cazxncil had reviewed, anaiyzed and studied said proposal. Section 6. At the public hearings several residents expressed concerns regarding the stability, erosion and mostly water run-off fram the praposed project and the impact on the downhill properties. Both, Lisa Naslund, the City's grading and drainage engineer and the applicants' engineer discussed the building code requirements for handling post development storrn water on properties; what Resolution Na. 1202 23 Crest Road East 1 studies and reports would be required and the issues that the reviewing engineer would be looking at. The applicants' engineer prepared several hydrology studies and responses to City Council cancerns and to residents' statements and letters. According to the applicants' engineer, the project will retain and slow down more run-off on site post construction than what is currently retained. At the October 10, 2016 City Council meeting, members of the City Council also expressed cancerns with the size of#he residence, grading quantities, steepness of the resulting slopes and visibility of the �roposed praject from Crest Road, the City's rnain thoroughfare, and appointed Councilmembers Black arid Pieper to an Ad Hoc Committee to work with the applicants to provide an irnproved and more acceptable project. Following a meeting with the Ad Hoc Committee and several revisions, on 7anuary 3, 2017,the applicants subrnitted a revised project to the City Council. Following lengthy discussion and objectians from a couple of residents regarding the drainage and results of the applicants' hydrology study, members of the City Council by a vote 4-1, at the January 9, 2017 meeting, directed staff to prepare a Resolution appro�ing the revised project. Section 7. The City Council fmds tha# the project is exempt from the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 (new construc�ion of single family residence and accessory structures), and Section 15061(b}(3) (common sense exemption) of the CEQA guidelines. Section 8. —Site Plan Review-Pro osed Develo ment. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring grading permit or any new building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the szze of the building or stxucture by not more than 999 square feet in any thirty-six (36) month period. The grading far the development and the new structures require Site Plan Review. The pooUspa requires a Site Plan Review due to the grading and the size (over S00 sq. ft. surface water area), and the dissipater retaining wall require a Site Plan Review due to its height of 5'. With respect to the Site Plan for�he de�elopment, the City Council hereby' approves the request for Site Plan Re�iew in Zoning Case Na. 902 to build the proposed project and makes the following findings: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the praposed structures coinply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space between sut�rounding structures and maintaining sufficient setbacks to provide buffers between residential uses. The net lot area of the lot is over 6 acres and the lot is adjacen# to ather large lots along Crest Road East, where most of the development wiil take place. The stable and corral promote the rural, equestrian character of Rolling Hills.None of the structures are in setbacks. The project conforms to Zoning Code lot co�erage requirements, including lot disturbance. The net lot area of the lot is 262,368 sr}uare feet. The struc#ural net 1ot coverage is proposed at 18,659 square feet or 7.1%, which includes all of the struchxres; with allowance for permitted deductions the structural lot coverage will be 6.9%, (20% max. permitted); and the total lot coverage proposed, including the driveway wou�d be 35,749 square feet or 13.6% excluding permitted deductions, (35% rnax. permitted). The disturbed area of the lot is proposed ta be 36.5%. B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by rninimizing building coverage. The topography and the configuration of the lot have been considered, and it was determined that the proposed development wi11 not adversely afFect or be rnaterially det�imental to adjacent uses, buildings, ar structures, because the proposed project will be constructed partially on the ea�isting undulated (not steep) area of the lot, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, wi11 be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will a11ow the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrot�nding property owners. The proposed project would be located on a gentler slope of the property and leaving the steeper and mare densely vegetated areas in their natural state ta the south, a�ong with the natural drainage course. 'FlZe revised project provides for less thati the maximum p�rmitted slope gradient in areas that would be most visible from Crest Road E. The project promotes equestrian uses, therefore furthering the Gity's goal to remain an equestrian community. Resolution No. 1202 23 Crest Road East 2 C. The propased development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scaie and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighbarhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of said lot. The development plan takes into consideration the views fram Crest Road East and the devclopment will be sunk and moved back from Crest Road East, so that views from the road will not be blocked. The residence is proposed on the shallowest sloped area with a basement being added to increase the residence size while reducing the foatprint. The slopes being created have been rounded and it was attempted to mimic the existing slope in the area. Significant partions of tl7e tot will be left undeveloped. The pro�ect will be screened from tl�e road and all neighbors. During the zeview process, at suggestions from the City Council and addressing the neighbors' concerns, the applicant scaled down the grading areas and the project in general to retain as much of the naiural#errain as possible and not greatly affect the lower building pad. D. The development plan witl introduce additianal landscaping, which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and the landscaping will provide a buf�er or transition area between private and public areas. There will be some clearing of existing landscaping due to overgrowth and improper maintenance that has become a fixe hazard. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the new 24' driveway will be safe to drive on as two cars can safely pass one another. There is ample paxking in the garages and there is a proposed parking pad at the front of the house, outside of all setbacks, so a11 visitor parking will be contained on site. An adequate driveway is proposed to safely accommodate horse trailers to the sta.ble and corral area. The Traffic Commission reviewed the proposed driveways and has recommended approval. Section 9 — Conditional Use Permits. Sections �7.1$.060 and 17.18.090 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a stable over 200 square feet and corral over 550 square feet with a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed 1,300 square foot sta.ble with 792 square £oot loft and corral compIy with all requirements of these sections. An 8Q0 square foat guesthouse is propased. Section 17.1b.210 (A)(5) of the Zoning Ordinance contains conditions for a guesthouse, subject to approval of a conditional use permit. AIl of the detached structures comply with the provisions and conditions for such stru.ctures. With respect to this request for Conditional Use Permit,the City Co�xncil finds as follaws: A. Conditionally permitted uses are not autrigh� permitted by the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. The City Council must consider applications for a Conditional Use Permit and may, with such condxtions as are deemed necessary, approve a conditional use wl2ich will not jeopardize, adverseIy affect, endanger or to otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, saf�ty or generai welfare or be materially detrimental to the property of other persons located in the vicinity of such use. B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the stable, corral and guesthause would be consistent with the purposes and objechves of the Zoning Qrdinance and General Plan because the uses are consistent with similar uses in the comm�nity, and meet all the applicable code deveIopment standards for such uses and they are located in areas on the property that are adequately sized ta accommadate such uses. The proposed uses are appropriately lacated in that they will be sufficiently separated from nearby structures used for habita.tion or containing sleeping quarters. The stable/corral would be constructed in fixrtherance of the General Plan goal of promoting and encouraging equestrian uses. The proposed guesthouse is a common amenity to Rolling Hills. C. The nature, condition, and develapment of adjacent structures have bee:n cansidered, and the project wiil not adversely affect or be materially detrimental ta these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the p:roposed uses (stable/corral, and guesthouse} are located in the middle of a 6.0 acre lot and their genera,l locatian is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so as to nat impact the view or privacy af surrounding neighbors. The proposed stable is to be located adjacent to the corra� and a path designated for equ�strian uses that runs from the stable to the road above is separate from the ` other outdoor living areas on the property and will be comprised of decomposed granite. D. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the proposed uses comp�y with the 1ow prof le residential development pattern of the community and will nat give the property an over-buiit look, and areas will remain open and unobstructed. The lot is 6.0 a�res net in size and is sufficiently large to accommodate the proposed uses. Resoludon No. i202 23 Crest Road East 3 _ �._ ,�,_ . _ .--,...�.�. The stable will be compatible with the uses in the surrounding area because Rolling Hills is an equestrian community and stables are encauraged. The stable will look like a stable and with the corral will promote open space on the pad. The guesthouse will be cornpatible with the uses in the surrounding area because it will have the same architectural design as the house and is in the rear yard and is an amenity ather residences in Rolling Hills enjoy. E. The proposed conditional uses camply with all applicable development standards of the zone district arid requires Conditional Use Permits pursuant to Sections 17.18A60, 17.18A90, �7.16.210(A)(5) of the Zoning Ordinance. F. The proposed conditional uses are consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Wast� Management Plan relating to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. Sect�on 10. Based upon the foregoing fmdings, and the evidence in the record, the City Council hereby appro�es Zoning Case No. 902 request for a Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Pezmits for the construction of a new 10,400 square foot residence, 10,400 square foot basement, 1,120 square foot garage, 475 square foot entry, a total of 2,$69 square feet covered porches - 2,500 sq.ft. at main residence, 264 sq.ft. at the stable and 105 sq.ft. at the guest house; a new paol and spa totaling 864 square feet witY� a 50 square foot pool equipment area, a 171 square foot service yard, a 250 square foot outdaor kitchen, a 350 square feet deta.ched trellis near the proposed 800 square foat guest house, a two- story stable with 1,3a0 square feet on the first lev�1 and a 792 square foot loft, a new dri�eway and turnaround access, a pervious access to the stable, several retaining walls and grading of a total of 48,18Q cubic yards of dirt; (the dirt from the basement, 5,750 c.y. may be exported), subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan and Conditional Use Permits approvals shall expire within twa years from the effective date of approval as defined in Sectians 17.46.Q80(A) and 17.42.070 of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirernents of this section. B. If any condition of this resolution is violated, the entitlement granted by this resolution shall be s�xspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written notice frorn the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease, other than work determined by the Ci�y Manager or his/her designee required to cure the violation. The suspension and stop work order will be lifted once the Applicant cures the violation to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his�er designee. In the event that the Applicant disputes the City Manager or hislher designee's determination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, the Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shail be scheduled at the next regular meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted, the Applicant shall be provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the hearing. The City Council shall make a determination as to whether a violation of this Resolution has occurred. If the Co�xncil determines that a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Cauncil determines that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council shall provide the Applicant with a deadline to cure the violation; no construction work shall be performed on the property until and unless the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work designated by the Council to accomplish the cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either extend the deadline at the Applicant's request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the entitlements granted by this Resolution p�xrsuant to Chapter 17.58 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code(RHMC). C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning ordinance, and of the zane in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this permit, or shown otherwi.se on an appraved plan�. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated Januaty 3, 2Q17, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The warking drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the appmved development plan. All conditions of the Site Plan Re�iew and Conditional Use Permit approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building departnlent. Resalu�ion No. 1202 23 Crest Road East 4 The conditions of approval of this Resolution shali be printed onto building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at a.11 times. Any modifications ancUor changes to the approved project, including resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed and approved by staff prior to implementing the changes. E. The Plans sha11 be submitted to the LA County Building and Safety Department for review, issuance of permits and inspections. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Sa£ety Depart�nent far issuance of building permits, the plans for the pro�ect sha�l be submitted ta City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the P1annFng Commissian. F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans far this project for Building Department review sha11 execute a Certificate af�'irtning that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth therein and�ttre City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building ancllor grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project wi11 be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. G. Structural 1ot coverage of the lot sha11 not exceed 18,659 square feet or 7.�.% of the net lat area, in confozmance with lat coverage limitations, and with the permitted allowances I8,189 square feet or 6.9°/a coverage, (20% maximuin}. The total 1at coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork, shall not exceed 35,749 square feet or 13.b%, of the net lot area, excluding deductions, in conformance with lat coverage limitations (35% maximum). H. The disturbed area of the lot, including the approved stable and cot�x�al shall not exceed 36.5%; over a 95,850 square feet surface area. Grading for this pro�ect shall not exceed a total of 48,180 cubic yards of which 5,750 c.y from ttre basement may be exported. I. The residential building pad is proposed at 41,660 squa.re feet and shal� not exceEd � coverage of 14,680 square feet or 35.3% with allowed deducdons. The stable pad is proposed at 11,IQ0 square feet and shall not exceed 2,259 square feet of coverage or 20.4%. � J. A new driveway shall be provided per the Fire Department requirements and the apron of the driveway shall be roughened and the first 20 feet of�e driveway shall not exceed 7% in slope. K. Access to the stable and to the corx�al shall be decomposed granite or like, 1Q0%pervious roughened material. L. Per Section 1716(A)(5}{c) of the zoning ardinance, only one sanitary facility consisting of a shower, sink, and a toilet and a laitchenette is permitted in the guesthouse; therE shall be no parking area within 50-feet of the guesthouse; no renting af the gues�house is permitted. M. A minimum of five-foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of ail o�the proposed structures, or as otherwise required by the Fire Departirient. N. At any�ime#here are horses on the property, Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be applied for manure cantrol, inclnding but not be limited to remaval of the manure on a da.ily basis ar provision of a receptacle with a tight closing lid that is constructed of brick, stone, concrete, metal or t ' wood Iined with metal or other saund material and that is safeguarded against access by flies. The . contents of saxd receptacles shall be removed once a week. It is prohibited to dispose of manure or any �` anima� wasfe into the Municipal Sepaxate Storm Sewer System (MS4}, into nahual drainage course or spread on the properiy. O. The pool equipment area shall be enclosed and the enclpsure screened with landscaping. Per LA County Building Code,pool barrier/fencing shall be required. P. T'he appl�cant sha11 comply with all req�xirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rol�ing Hills (RHMC 17.1b.190 E), pertaining to lighting on said property; roofing and material Resolution No. 1202 23 Crest Raad East S � requirements of properties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and all other ordinances and laws of the City of Rolling Hills and the LA County Building Code. Q. A11 utility lines to the residence, guesthouse, and sta.ble shall be placed underground, subject to all applicable standards and requirements. R. Hydrology, soils, geology and other reports, as required by the LA County Building and Public Works Departments, and as may be required by the Building Official, shall be prepared. S. Prior to issuance of a final consixuction appraval of the project, all graded slapes shall be landscaped. Prior to issuance of building permit, a landscaping plan shall be submitted ta the City in confarmance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements and requirements for graded slopes. The landscaping shall not form a hedge like screen but be offset. The height of any new trees and shrubs to be planted in conjunction with this project shall not at any time exceed the ridgeline of the roof of the structures, which they are screening. In order to preserve the sightline of the view from Crest Road East, the height of any landscaping planted on the property along the Crest Road E. roadway easement, ar along the front of the residence shall be maintained so as not to exceed three (3) �eet from the road elevation. The Iandscaping plan shall utilize to�the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area, are water-wise and are consistent with the rural character of the community. The landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City's Water Efficient Landscape �rdinance, (Chapter 13.18 af the RHI1�fC). T. The dissipaters and pool equipment area �hall be screened with landscaping. Sound attenuating equipment shall be instailed to dampen the sound from the pool equipment area and the pool pump. The project shall utilize the most quiet and technologically advanced equiprnent to dampen the sound. U. The setback lines and roadway easement lines in i�he vicinity of the construction far this proj ect shall remain staked throughou� the construction. During construction a construction fence shall be installed. V. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shali remain free and clear o�any improvements including,but not be limited to fences-including construction fences, any hardscape, driveways, landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, except as otherwise appro�ed by the Rolling Hi11s Community Association. In addition, any construction facility, such as a construction trailer/off'ice ar parkable toilets, to a maximum extent practicable, shall be located in a manner not visible from the street, and be in a location satisfactory to City staff. W. Minimum of 65% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler o£the materials shall obtain City's Construction and Demolition permits for was#e hauling priar to start o£work and provide proper c�ocurnentation to the City. X. During constf-uction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordina.nces and engineering practices shall be required, so that people ax properiy are not exposed to undue vehicle tY'ips, noise, dust, ar�d objectionable odors. Y. Construction vehicles or equipment, employees vehicles or delivery trucks, to the maxirnum extend practical, shall not impede any traffic lanes; if it becomes necessary to block traffic in order to aid in the construction, no more than a single lane or portion thereof may be blocked for a short period of time and flag�nen utilized on both sides of the impeded area to direct traffic. Z. Durirtg construction, ail parking shall take place on the project site, on the new driveway and, if necessary, any o�erflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easement along Crest Road East, an�d shall not obstruct neighboring driveways or pedestrian and equesh�ian passage. During construction,to#k�e rnaximum extent feasible, employees of the contractar shall car-pool inta the City. A minimum of 4' wide path, from the edge of#he roadway pa�ement, for pedestrian and equestrian passage shall be available and clear at all times. AA. During carastruction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traff c noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as r�ot to interfere with the quiet residendal environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Resolution No. 1202 23 Crest Road East 6 AB. The contractor sha�l not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Wea�her conditions can be found at: htt�://www.wrh.noaa.govllvx/main.pho?suite=safety&�a�e hazard definitions#FTRE. it is the sole responsibility of the praperry owner anc3/or hislher contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if work is to be conducted on the property,the contractor shall have readily available fire extinguisher. AC. The properiy owners shall be required #o conform with the Regional Water Quality Cantrol Board and County Public Works Department Best Managexnent Practices (BMP's) requirements related to so�id waste, drainage, cistern construction and maintenance, septic tank construction and maintenance in conformance with the County Health Department, storm water drainage facilities mana.gement, and to the City's Low Impact development Ordinance (LID}. AD. Prior to fmaling of the project an "as graded" and "as constructed" plans and certifications, including certifications of ridgelines of the structures, shall be provided ta the Planning Deparhnent and the Building Department to ascertain that the competed project is in compliance with the approved plans. In addition, any modification made to the project during construction, shalZ be depicted on the"as built/as graded"plan. AE. The applicant sha11 execute an Afficia.vit of Accepta�nce of all conditions of this pertnit pursuant to Zoning Ordinance, or the approval shall not be effective. The affidavit shall be recorded tagether with the resoIutian. PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF FEBRUARY,2017. . BEA DI RINGER, YOR ATTEST: HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be fi�ed within the time limits set forth in Sec�ion 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Resolution No. 1202 23 Crest Road East 7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) i certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1202 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENCE WITH BASEMENT, GARAGES, COVERED PORCHES, SWINIMING POOL WITH A SPA, RETAINING WALLS AND NEW DRIVEWAY; AND REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A GUESTHOUSE AND STABLE WITH LOFT AND CORRAL AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS IN ZONING CASE NO. 902 AT 23 CREST RDAD EAST, LOT 132A-MS, (HYNES). THE PROJECT WAS DETERMIlVED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) was approved and adopted at a regular mee�ing of the City �ouncil on Febr�ary 13, 20�7, by the following ro11 call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Black, Mixsch, Pieper and Mayor Dieringer. NOES: Councilmember Wilson. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administratiee Offices. , ,�,� � _� ,� HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK Resolution No. 1202 23 Crest Road East 8