2017-20 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-20
A RESOLUTION �F THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY QF ROLLING
HILLS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW, CONDTTIONAL USE
PERMIT, AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW GARAGE,
RESIDENTI.AL CONVERSION/ADDITION, ADDITION TO POOL HOUSE, SPA, NEW
RETAIIVING WALLS AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED V�7ALL
HEIGHT AVERAGE AND DISTURBANCE OF THE LOT 1N ZON _NG CASE NO. 925
AT 16 PINE TREE LANE (LOT 81-1-RH}, (SiJNITHA BHARADIA}
THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOES HEREBY FIND; RESOLVE AND ORDER A� FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Sunitha Bharadia with respect to real property
located at 16 Pine Tree Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 81-1-RH} requesting a Site Plan Review, Conditional
Use Permit, and Variances for the construc�ion of a new 938 square foot garage and a 484 square foot
residential conversion/addition, an add.itian of 352 square feet ta an existing 430 square foot pool house
(782 s.f. total), a spa, reta.ining walls averaging greater than 2 1/z feet, and addi.tional disturbance that
exceeds the maximum allowable 40%. Grading for this project will entail a total af 491 cubic yards of
dirt. The existing apron will be closed off and a new driveway and driveway apron wi11 be constructed.�
Sec�ion 2. A public notice for the proposed pro�ect was initially issued an 3uly 7, 2417.
However,the item was not heard and was continued until August 15,2017'. The Planning�ommission
conducted duly noticed p�btxc hearings held on August 15,2017 and September 19, 2017. The Planning
Commissian viewed the praject in the field, opened the hearing ta enable brief public testimony and
eontinued the meeting to the evening meeting of�he Planring Commission. At�he Sep�ember 19, 2017
evening meeting,the Planning Commission provided direction to staff to prepare a resolution of
appro�al for the proposed project with some contingent considerations based on possible new proposal
elements and explanation of grading and slope steepness. On October 7, 2017, an additional va�iance to
a11ow for wa11s avexaging above 21/2 feet in height was d�aly noticed.
Neighbors within 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in
the Peninsula News on August 4, 201.7. The applicants and the�r agents were notified of the public
hearings in writing by first class mail and the appiicants and ager�ts were in at�ndance at�he hearings, at
wluch evidence was heard and presented from all person interested in affecting said propasal, and from
members of the City staff.
Section 3. The property is zoned R.AS-2 and the lot area is 2.73 gross acres. The net Xot area
of the lot is 97,812 square feet or 2.24 acres. The lot is located off of a cul-de-sac and is adjacent ta three
vacant properties.
Previously approved improvements on the property include a residence and attached garage, swimming
pool,pool house, and tennis court. The proposed additions will be to some of these existing structures on
the properiy.
Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project is exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA)pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 of the CEQA guidelines.
Section 5. Site Plan Review. With respect to tlze Plans submitted far the development, the
Planning Commission hereby approves fihe request far Site P1an Review in Zoning Case No. 925 to
build the proposed project and makes the following fmdings:
Resolution No. 2017-20
16 Pine Tree Lane -1-
A. The proposed development is cornpatible with the General Pl�n, the Zoning Ordinance
and surrounding uses because the praposed structures comply with the General Plan requixement of low
profile, low-density residential development with suff cient open space between surxounding structures
and main�a.uung sufficient setbacks to provide buffers between residential uses. The net iot area of the
properry xs 2.24 acres wk�ich is within the requirements of the RAS-2 zone. Only one of the proposed
new structures is considered to be in a setback which is a tliree foot retaining wa11 which is allowable
under the zoning code.
The project conforms to Zoning Cade.lat coverage requirements. The net lot area of the property is
97,812 square feet. The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 16.15%, with allowance for p�rmitted
deductions, (20% max. permitted); and the total lot coverage proposed, including the driveway would be
33.64%, (35%max. pernutted}. The disturbed area of the lot is proposed to be 45.7%which is above the
40%maximum disturbance allowed.
B. The project substantially preserves thE natural and undeveloped state of the lot by
m;nimi7.jpg building covErage. The configuration o�fhe lot has been considered, and it was detertnined
that the proposed development will not adverse�y affect or be ma.texially detrimental to adjacent uses,
buildings, or structures, because the proposed location of structures on the lot are consistent with
surrounding development, and are of sufficient distance from nearby residences s�that it wi11 not impact
�he view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will allow tlie awners to enjoy their property without
deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounda'ng pxope:rty owners.
The project includes the required stable and corral set aside area and access and thereby promotes
equestrian uses, furt�'�ering the City's goal to remain an equcstrian cammunity.
C. The proposed development, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is
consistent with the scale of the neighborhaod when compazed to new residences in the vicinity af said
1ot. The development plan takes into consideration the visibility from all roadway easements with
several of the proposed improvements being located in one of the least visible portions of the property.
D. Any new landscaping must be compatible with and enha.nce the ru�ral chazacter of the
cornmu�ity, and the la.ndscaping should pro�ide a buffer or transition area between private and public
areas.
E. The proposed developmen#is sensitive and not detrimental to the conven:ience and safety
of circulation for pedestrians and vehic�es because the new driveway apron has been reviewed by a
traffic engineer and recommended for approval by the Tr�c Commission. There is ample �arlci�g in
the garage which is increasing the number of spaces and fhere is parking fox guests on site.
Section 6. Conditional Use Perxnit. Section 17.16.040 {3) of the Ralling Hills Municipal
Code permits approval of a pool house with a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed 782 square pool
�xa�.z�e, a.��.�r�.�� �rage�e� �e�:iQ� �:� cer��z�te�', c�r��l��� v,nth a,,'I req�,:ireme��� �f:hi� s�4tion. �ith
respect to this requast for a Conditional Use Perniit,the Planning Commission finds as follaws:
A. Conditionally permitted uses are not outright permitted by the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code. The Planning Commission must consider applica�ions for a Conditiona.l Use Permi�and may, with
such conditions as are deemed necessary, approve a conditional use which will not jeopardize, adversely
affect, endanger or to otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or genexal welfare or be
materially detrimenta.l.to the property of other persons located in the vicinity of suck�use.
Resolution No. 2017-20
16 Pine Tree La�e -2-
B. The granting af a Conditional Use Permit for the pool house additaons would be
consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and Generai Plan because the use is
consistent with similar uses in the community, and meets a11 the applicabl� code development standards
for such use, and is located in the area of tk�.e pxoperty that are adequa.tely sized to accommodate such
uses, under the existing pool house roof.
C. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent stxuctures have been cansidered, and
the project will not adverseiy affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or
structures because the proposed pool house addition is located mastly in th� middle of a 2.73 acre lot
and the generallocation is of sufFcient distance from nearby residences so as to not impact the view or
privacy of surrounding neighbors.
D. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrai.n, and
surrounding residences because the proposed use complies with the low profile residential develapment
pattern of the community and will not give the properiy an over-built iaok, aild areas will remain open
and unobstructed. The lot is 2.24 acres net in size and is sufficiendy lazge to accammodate the proposed
use.
E. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the
zone district and requires Conditional Use Permits pursuant to Section 17.16.040 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
F. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angetes County
�Iazardous Waste Management P�an relating to siting criteria for hazardous waste facxli.�ies because tl�e
project site is not listed on the cutrent State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.
Sectzon 7. Variances. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Code permit approval of a
variance from the standards and requirements o� th.e Zonizxg Ordi.z�ance when, due to exceptianal or
ex�raordinary circi�mstances applicable to the property and nat applicable ta other similar properties in
the same zone, strict application of the Coc�e would deny the properry owner substantial property rights
enjoyed by otl�ex properties in the same vicinity and zone. The applicant seeks variances from the
requir�ments that the wa,lls being proposed average less than 2 1/Z feet in height and the disturbance is
higher than the permitted 40%. The proposed average wa11 height is 2.7 feet and the proposed
disturbance is 45.7%. With respect to this request for Vazia,nces, the Planning Commission finds as
follows:
A. There are exceptional and e�raordinary cixcumstances and conditions applicable ta the
property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class af use in the
same zone because the existing lot already exceeds the allowable disturbance at 41.7% and the walls
being proposed allow for 2:1 slopes rather than rnultiple wails with flat planting areas behind them.
R. The �ariance i� ne��ssa.*y fa: ��:� �rese�va�Qu �� �njcymen� o£a ��b�tar�*�i�' g�o�er�y
right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, which would be denied to the property
in question absent a variance, because the site is sloped in natuxe so in order to provide pads that meet
the development standards, and restore the slopes to 2:1, additional grading is required and it was
necessary to push the limits of gra.c�ing farther out than if the lot did not have as rnuch slope to it. The
overage is not significant and the property owner shouid no# be denied the privilege of a new house
addition and a.menifies because of the attempt to restore one of th� original property slopes and therehy
the topographic na.ture of the Iot.
Resolution No. 2017-20
16 Pine Tree Lane -3-
The exceedance o�the disturbance is due in large part to the need for slope restoration. There
were no concerns voiced by residents during the public hearing and it is believed the proposed plan will
cause the least impact to the area a,fter further consideration of project alternatives.
C. The granting of the Varxance would not be m�aterial�y detrimental to the public weifare or
injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. A
minor increase in the overall percentage of disturbed area on the lot will ha.ve no effect on the public
welfaze ar on property or improvements in the vicinity and the walls which exceed 2.5' avera.ge in height
are not in any visible part of the property to the street and will not cause any line of sight issues on Pine
Tree Lane due to the existing landscaping on the pxoperty that will screen the proposed wall.
D. The variance does not grant special privileges to the applicant. To the contrary, absent a
variance, the property owner would be deprived of the same rights and privileges afforded to other
property owners in the vicuuty. Unique cucumstances applicable to the subject property make it
infeasible for the proparty owner to comply wi�li Section 17.16.070. The minor overage requested will
a11ow the property owner to enjoy the same rights and privileges afforded to manq other properties in the
vicin.ity and zane.
E. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous
Waste Management Pian relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities:
F. The variance request is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project, together
with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs
specified in the �eneral Plan and wi11 uphold the City's goals to protect and promot� construction that is
rural in nature.
Section S. Based upon the foregoing findings, and the evidence in the record, the Planning
Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 925 xequest £ox a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use
Permit, and Variances for the cans�ruction of a new 938 sc�uare foot gaz�age and a 484 square foot
residential conversion/addi#ion, an addition o£352 square feet to an existing 430 square foot paol house
(782 s.f. tatal}, a spa, retaining wa11s averaging greater than 2 '/z feet, and additianal disturbance that
exceeds the ma,�mu�n allawable 40%, subject to the following canditions:
A. The Site Plan, Variances and Conditional Use 1'ernuts appro�als sha11 expire within two
years from the effective date of approval as defined in �ections 17.46.080(A), 17.38.Q70 and 17.42.U70
of�he Zoning Ord�nance unless otherwxse e�ended pursuant to fhe requ;iarements of these sections.
B, If any candition of this resolution is violated, the entitlement granted by this resolution
shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written no�ice
from the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease,
other than work determined by the City Managex or his�er designee required to cure the violation. The
s�;s�ens�Qr_ar_d s+eg wQ:k�r�:;r��.�1�e �i�t�d��ce�.�� 4,���iear�:e��s t�e�ie�ktion te�,�e �a�sfactiau��
the City Manager ox hislher designee. In the event tha.t the Applicant disputes �e City Manager or
hisl�ier designee's deterxnination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, ttxe
Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be scheduled at the ne�'t
reguiar meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted,the Applxcant shail be
provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order sha11 remain in eff�ct during the pendency
of'the hearing. The City Council shall make a deternunation as to whether a violation of this Resolution
has accurred. If the Council determines tl�at a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time
Resolu�ion No. 2017-20
16 Pine Tree Lane -4-
of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Council deternunes
that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council sha11 provide the Appiicant with a
deadline to cure the violation; no construction work sha11 be performed on the property until and unless
the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work desigz�ated by the Council to accomglish the
cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either eartend the deadline at the
Applicant's request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the ent��lements granted hy this
Resolu�ion pursuant to Chapter 17.58 of the Rolling Hills Municipai Code (RHI1�C).
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, tlie Zoning ordinance, and
of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless atherwise set forth in
this perrnit, or shown o�herwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot sha11 be developed and maintained in s�tbstantial conformance with the site plan
on file dated October 5, 2017, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings
submitted to the D�partment of Building and Safety for plan check review shaJ.I conform to the approved
developrnent plan. All conditions of the Site Plan Review, Variances and Conditional Use Permit
approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable
complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building depa�hhment.
The condit�ons of approval of this Resolution shall be printed oz�to building plans submitted to the
B�xilding Department for review and sha11 be kept on site at alI times.
Any modifications ancUor changes to the appraved project, including resulting from field conditions,
shall be discussed and approved by staff prior to implementing the changes. A modification may r�quire
a public hear�ng be�ore the P�anxzi,�g �ommission if t��e modification represents a major z�odi.fieation ta
the project.
E. Prior to submittal of fmal workir�g drawings ta Building and Safety Department (or the
e�rpediting consultant retained by the City} for issuance of building permits, the plans for the project
shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans
a�proved by the Planuing Corrunission. A drainage plan, if required by the Building Department, shall
be prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction p.erinit. Such plan shall be
subject to LA County Code requirements.
F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans tor this project for Building
Department review shall execute a Certificate ai-�irnung that the plans conform in all respects to this
l�esolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth therezn and t11e City's Building Code
axad Zoning Ordinance.
Further, the person obta�ning a building andlor grading permit tbr this project shall execute a Certifica�e
of Construction affirm�ng tha.t the projeet will be eonstructed accorcling to this Resolution and any plans
approved therewith.
G. Structural lot coverage of the lot sha11 not exceed 16.15% of the net 1ot area, in
canformance with lot coverage limitations, and with the permitted allowances of structural coverage,
(20%maximum).
Tiie total lot covexage praposed, inciuding strucfiures and flatwork, shail not exceed 33.64%, o�the net
lot area, excluding deductions, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (35%maximum).
Resolution No. 2017-20
16 Pine Tree Lane -5-
H. The disturbed area of the lot, including the fute�re stable and corral shal� not exceed
45.7%. Grading for tlais project shall nat exceed a total of 491 cubic yards, of�vhich the excavation from
the basement may be exported.
I. The residential building pad is proposed at 12,800 square feet and shall not exceed
coverage of 6,975 square feet or 5�.49%with allawed deductions.
J. The finished height of the existing residence ridgeline is to remain at 15.25 feet.
K The highest garage ridgeline height will be 19 feet 3 inches.; the ridge height of the pool
house shall remain the same as the existing. Ridge heights shall be measured from finished grade.
L. The proposed basement sha.11 not exc�ed 982 square feet and the finished basement
ceiling sha11 not exceed 10 feet in height and shall meet al1 requirements of the Los Angeles County
Building Code for basements, including e�t daoxs and pravision for light and ventilation.
M. The pxoperty on which the project is located sha11 maintain an area o�min�mum of 1,000
square feet to provide an area meeting alI standards for a future sta.ble (450 square feet) and corral {550
square feet)with access thereto.
N. The new dxi�eway a.nd dri�eway apron shall meet the Traffic Commission
recommendations and the existing apron shall be closed off with a curb and old driveway landscaped.
Proposed access to the �uture stable and to the corral shall remain available for future stable access with
no construction obstructing the proposed pathway.
O. Per Section 17.16.210(A)(2) of the zoning ordinance, only one sanitary facility cansisting
of a shower, sink, and a toilet and a kitchenette is permitted in the pool hause.
P. A minimum of five-foot walkable path and/or walkway,which does not have to be paved,
shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed structures, or as othet�wise required
by the Fire Department.
C�. If addi�tional pool et�uipment is installed for the spa, or existing equipment is changed out,
then it sha�l be screened;if by a salid wall, the wa11 shall nat exceed 5 feet in height at any point from
finished gxade. Sound attenuating ec�uipment shall be installed to dampen the sound. The swunming pool
and spa shall utilize the most quiet and t,�chnologically advanced equipment ta dampen the sound.
Landscaping shall be utilized to sc;reen fhe wa11, so that it is not visible from the neighbor's properry.
Pex LA County Building Code,pool and spa barrierlfencing shall be required.
R. Ff a dissipater is requirec�, it sha11 be screened with landscaping, in a manner as to not
impede the flow of the run-off.
S. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of
Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190 E),pertaining to ligl��ing on sa.id praperiy;roofmg and n�aterial
requirements of pro�erties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, a.nd a11 other ordinances and
laws of the City of Rolling Hills and the LA County Building Code.
T. All utility lines to the residence and pool house s1na11 be placed underground, subject to
all applicable standards and requirements.
Resolution No. 2017-20
16 Pine Tree Lane -b�
U. Hydrology, soils, geology and other reports, as reqwired by the LA County Builc�ing and
Public Works Departments, and as ma.y be required by the Building Official, shall be prepared.
V. The graded slope areas shal� be landscaped, and continually maintained in substantial
conformance with the landscaping plan to be approved by City �taff.
Prior to issuance of a fmal constnzction ar grading approval of the project, a11 graded s�opes shall be
landscaped.
Prior to issuance of building permit, a detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City in
conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements and requi�tements for graded slopes.
T�ie detailed landscaping plan sha11 provide that any trees and shrubs used in the Zandscaping scheme for
this praject shall be planted in a way that screens the project development from adjacent streets and
neighbors, such that shrubs and trees as they grow do not grow into a hedge or impede any neighbors
significant views and the plan shall provide that all landscaping be ma,intained at a height no higher than
the roof line of the highest structure on the praperiy. The iandscaping plan sha11 utilize to the ma�imum
extent feasible, plants that are na�ive to the area, are water-wise and are consistent with the rural
character of the community.
The landscapi.ng sha11 be subject to the requirements of the City's Wa�ex E�ficient Landscape Qrdinance,
(Chapter 13.I8 of the��C).
X. The setback lines and roadway easement lines in the vicinity of the construction for this
project shall rernaan staked throughout the corvstruction. Buring construction a construction fence rmay
be xequi�red to be installed.
Y. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, i� any, sha11 rernain free
and clear af any improvernents including, but not be limited to fences-including canstruction fences, any
hardscape, driveways, Zandscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, except as otherwise approved by the
Rolling HiXls Commu�ity Association.
In addition, any construction facility, such as a eonstruction trailerloffice or portable to�lets, to a
maximmn extent practicable, shall be located in a manner not visible frorn the street, and be in a location
satisfactory to City staff.
Z. Minimum of 65% o� any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from
landfills. The hauler of the materials sha11 obtain City's Construction and Demolition permits for waste
hau�ing prior to start af work and provide proper documentation to the City.
AA. During constr�uctfon, confozmance with�he air quality management district requirements,
storm water pollution prevention practices, county and locai ordinances and engineering practices shall
�e required, so that peo�le or pro�ert� are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and
objectionable odors.
AB. Construction vehicles or equipment, employees vehicles, delivery trucks sk�all not im�ede
any traff c lanes to the�aaa�imum extend practical; and if necessary to block traffic in order to aid in the
construction, no more than a single lane may be blocked for a short period of time and flagmen uti�ized
on both sides of the impeded area to direct tra£fic.
Resolution No. 2017-20
16 Pine Tree Lane -7-
AC. During consiruction, a11 parking shall take place on the project site, and, if necessary, any
overflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easement along and cul-de-sac of Pine
Tree Lane, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways or pedestria� and equestrian passage. During
construction,to the maximum extent feasible, employees af the contractor shall car-pool into the City. A
minimum of 4' wide path, from the edge of the roadway pavement, for pedestrian and eqnestrian
passage shall be avai�able and clear at all times.
AD. During construction, the property owners sha11 be required to schedule and regulate
construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and b PM, Monday
thraugh Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is pert�utted, so as not to
interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
AE. The contractor shall not use tools that could pxoduce a spark, including for clearing and
grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at:
http:l/www.wrh.noaa.gov/�ax/main.pho?suite=safety&page=hazard definitions#FIRE.
It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag
warning conditions. Should a red flag warniiig be declared and if work is to be conducted on #1ze
property,the contractor sha11 have readily available fire extinguisher.
AF. The properly owz�exs shall be required to conform with the Regianal Wa#er Quality
Control Board and Connty Public Works Delaartment Best Mana.gement Practices (BMP's) requirements
related to solid waste, draina.ge, septic tank construction and mai.ntenance in conformance with the
County Health Department, storm water drainag� facilities management, and to the City's Low Impact
develapment Ordinance {LID, if applicable).
AG. Prior to finaling of the project an "as graded" and "as constructed" pians and
certifications, including certifications of ridgelines of the strEictures, shall be provided to the P�a�nning
Deparhnent and th� Building Department to ascertain that the competed proiect is in compliance with
the approved plans. In addition, any modificatian made to the project during construction, sha1Z be
depictedllisted on the "as builtlas graded"plan.
AH. The applicant shall exeeute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this permit
pursuant to Zoning Ordinance, or the approval sha11 not be effective. The affida.vit shall be recorded
together with the resalution.
AI. Prior to demolitaan of the existing slructures, an investigation shall be conducted far the
presence of hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury and asbestos-containing
materials (ACMs). If hazardous che�nicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury or ACMs are
identif ed, remediation shall be undertaken in compliance with California en�ironmental regulations and
policies.
Resolution No. 2017-20
16 Pine Tree Lane -8-
PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF OCTOBER 2017.
CHE F, CHAI
ATTEST;
�
YVE TE HALL,INTERIM CITY CLERK
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on.this
application must he filed within the t.�me limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code and Code af Civil Procedure Section 1094.b.
Resolution No. 2017-20
16 Pine Tree Lane -9-
STATE OF CALIFQItNIA }
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS }
I certify that the for�going Resolution No. 2017-20 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANN�NG COMIVIISSION OF THE CTTY OF ROLLING
HILLS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW, CO�TDITIONAL USE
PERMIT, AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF �IEW GARAGE,
RES�DENTIAL CONVERSION/ADDITION, ADDITION TO POOL HOUSE, SPA, NEW
RETAINING WALLS AND TQ EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED WALL
HEIGHT AVERAGE AND DISTURBANCE OF THE LOT IN ZQNING CASE NO. 925
AT 16 PINE TREE LANE {LOT SZ-1-RH}, (SLTNITHA.BHAR.ADIA).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 17, 2017, by�he
following xoll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cardenas, Cooley, Seaburn and Chair Che1f.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Kirkpatrick.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrati�e Offices.
�� '' � � ��
T'TE HALL, INTERIlVi CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 2017-20
16 Pine Tree Lane -10-