Loading...
10-23-18.pdf REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2018 CALL MEETING TO.ORDER A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order by , Chairman Chelf at 6:32 p.m. on Tuesday, October, 23, 2018 in the City Council Chamber, at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Cardenas, Seaburn, and Chairman Chelf. Commissioners Absent: Cooley (excused) and Kirkpatrick(excused). Others Present: Yolanta Schwartz,Planning Director. Jane Abzug, Assistant City Attorney. Julia Stewart, Senior Planner. Yvette Hall, City Clerk. Karla Rangel, Adminisfirative Clerk. Clint Patterson, 2 El Concho Lane. Dan Bolton, Bolton Engineers. Jay Ahluwalia, Storm Properties Representa.tive. Michael Song, Architect,EZ Plans, Inc. Deborah Richie-Bray, Architect, Richie-Bray Architects. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Approved as presented. PUBLIC CONIMENTS ON MINUTES AND ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 25, 2018 Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission Commissioner Cardenas moved that the Planning Commission approve the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on September 25, 2018. Commissioner Seaburn seconded the motion, which carried without objection(Cooley and Kirkpatrick absent). RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 2018-14. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, A NEW PORTE COCHERE AND NEW ABOVE GRADE DECK TO ENCROACH INTO SETBACKS, AND WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR STABLE AND CORRAL SET ASIDE AREA 1N ZONING CASE NO. 946 AT 2 EL CONCHO LANE,LOT 7-GF, (RICK BOOS/CLINT PATTERSON). Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Senior Planner Stewart stated that this item is a Resolution of Approval for 2 El Concho Lane. She stated that the applicant is seeking a Site Plan Review for residential additions, remodel, new porte cochere, raised deck and variances to allow for those items. She explained the project and stated that the existing circular driveway is an existing legal non-conforming condition, and will remain. She reviewed the setbacks and explained that portions of the existing house are in the setback area. She stated that some of the proposed residential additions in the front setback are to enclose what is currently the entryway, move that entryway to another portion of the house and construct a new porte cochere. Action Memo Planning Commission Meeting 10-23-18 Page 1 of 6 She explained that in the rear of the house there is a new proposed raised deck and new deck areas, and two additions to the residence proposed in the back. She reviewed the elevations for the deck area. Senior Planner Stewart reviewed the applicant's request for a waiver of the requirement for a set aside for a stable and corral. She stated that a contingency to this waiver request was to place the set aside area in the front yard setback area; however, this would require a variance, if approved, due to the location. Senior Planner Stewart stated that due to concerns with keeping animals close to the roadway easement and possible odor issues that could be created for the neighbor, the applicant is seeking a variance. Senior Planner Stewart stated that the applicant considered the possibility of placing the set aside to the rear of the property; however, due to the steep topography, this would require extensive grading to create switchbacks for access. She further stated that access would not be possible off the bridle trail because there is a blue line stream that runs partially through the property that would make it impossible for them to access the stable. Senior Planner Stewart noted there was one resident who expressed support for the project. She stated that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Clint Patterson, 2 El Concho Lane, thanked the Planning Commission (PC) for making this process transparent, fair and clear. He commented that he appreciated the PC's objectivity and that working with staff was a straightforward process. Chairman Chelf closed public comment. Chairman Chelf thanked Mr. Patterson for his comments. Commissioner Seaburn commented that the Resolution addresses all items that were discussed at the last PC meeting; therefore, he considers the project ready for final approval. Commissioner Cardenas commented that the site visit was helpful to understand the necessity for granting the stable and corral set aside waiver. Commissioner Cardenas stated that he supports the Resolution. Following public comment and discussion, Commissioner Seaburn moved to approve the Resolution as presented in Zoning Case No. 946 at 2 El Concho Lane. Commissioner Cardenas seconded the motion, which carried without objection(Cooley and Kirkpatrick absent). RESOLUTION NO. 2018-15. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GR�INTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND VARIANCES TO ALLOW GRADING, WALLS, AND A 5,000 SQUARE FOOT RIDING RING IN THE FRONT SETBACK AND FRONT YARD AND TO IMPORT DIRT IN ZONING CASE NO. 947 AT 34 SADDLEBACK ROAD, LOT 13-RH, (EDDY DELGADO). Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staffl s comments. Senior Planner Stewart stated that this is a Resolution of Approval for 34 Saddleback Road. She stated that the applicant is proposing a 5,000 square foot riding ring in the front yard area. She stated that the proposed project requires a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variances. She reviewed the development plan and stated that the riding ring requires 671 cubic yards of grading and that the applicant is requesting import of 189 cubic yards of dirt. She stated that one of the reasons provided for placing the riding ring in the front yard area is that the property owners would like their horses to access other areas of the front yard and to preserve some of the mature trees on the property. She noted that this request was part of a previous proposal and that the riding ring in that proposal was approved; however, the approval expired, Senior Planner Stewart stated that during the field visit to the site, a discussion was held on the height of the walls fronting the riding ring. She indicated that none of the walls would be higher than 3 feet and 9 inches and that staff placed a condition in the Resolution to allow up to 4 feet walls maximum to allow for unexpected field conditions. She reviewed the setbacks in relationship to the riding ring. Senior Planner Stewart indicated that there were no inquiries from the surrounding residents regarding this project. She stated that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Hearing none, he closed the public comment section. Commissioner Seaburn expressed support for the proposed project. Commissioner Cardenas concurred with Commissioner Seaburn's aforementioned comment. Minutes Planning Commission Meeting io-23-is 2 of6 Commissioner Cardenas moved to approve the Resolution as presented in Zoning Case No. 947 at 34 Saddleback Road. Commissioner Seaburn seconded the motion, which carried without objection (Cooley and Kirkpatrick absent). PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ITEMS CONTINUED FROM A PREVIOUS MEETING ZONING CASE NO. 951. Request for Site Plan Review for a new residential addition of 1,087 square feet, new 410 square foot covered porch, addition to a raised deck and 300 cubic yards of grading; and Variances to encroach with portions of the proposed residential addition and raised deck into the front and side yard setbacks and to a11ow the stable and corral set aside area to be located in the front yard setback and in the front of the leading edge of the residence. The subject property is located at 26 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 248-A-2-UR) Rolling Hills, CA, (Manquen). Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Senior Planner Stewart stated that the PC conducted a site visit at 26 Middleridge Lane this morning. She stated that the applicant is requesting multiple residential additions including a raised deck addition, new covered porch, and stable and corral set aside area that would be in the front yard setback. She stated that the property has a unique shape and reviewed the property map showing the set aside areas. Senior Planner Stewart indicated that the project requires a Site Plan Review for the residential additions, covered porch, raised deck addition and grading. She indicated that Variances are for encroachments into the setback areas. She reviewed the proposed stable and corral set aside axea. She stated that there were a few elements that were not included under the Site Plan Review and are part of the project, which include a new 291 square foot covered porch, 11 square foot increase to the garage and a new attached trellis that will be in front of the house. Senior Planner Stewart noted that these are all items that can be approved over the counter if there were no discretionary elements to the project. Senior Planner Stewart noted that the ridgelines are proposed to be increased in height and indicated these were staked at the field visit today. She stated that staff checked if the ridgelines extended out the eaves and confirmed they do, in response to a question that was asked at the field visit, because the staking depicts the exterior wall, not the exterior eaves. Senior Planner Stewart reviewed the elevation of the raised deck area, proposed floor area, proposed roof plan, new addition with the higher ridgeline, grading, and stable set aside calculations. She reviewed the proposed variances for the residential addition encroachments, stable and corral set aside area, which is located in the front yard setback. She indicated that the project coverage's fall under the allowable limits of the code and that there were no comments received from the surrounding residents regarding the project. Senior Planner Stewart stated that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Dan Bolton, Bolton Engineering, spoke on behalf of the applicant. He thanked the PC for visiting the site and staff for their efforts in preparing the report. Mr. Bolton stated that he felt the project spoke for itself. In response to Chairman Chelfls question,Mr. Bolton stated that he had not given specific thought to the type of landscaping that would be placed along the wall that runs in front of the deck. He stated that he is open and amenable to a condition for a landscape plan. Discussion ensued among the PC concerning landscaping in front of the raised deck. Chairxnan Chelf closed public coinments. Commissioner Caxdenas commented that he supports the project. Commissioner Seaburn commented that the project was good and that there is nothing that can be done concerning the set aside due to the steepness in the back. He suggested that the applicant landscape in front of the raised deck. Chairman Chelf commented that he felt the applicant is converting some unusual features of the home and enhancing them to a better state. He stated that the ridgeline, because of where it sits, in relation to the house ne�ct door and other residences, is not blocking the views. He expressed support of the project. Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 10-23-1s 3 of 6 Following public comment and discussion, Commissioner Cardenas moved that the Planning Commission direct staff to prepaxe a Resolution granting approval of the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 951 at 26 Middleridge Lane South and to include only the standard language for landscaping. Commissioner Seaburn seconded the motion, which carried without objection (Cooley and Kirkpatrick absent). NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS ZONING CASE NO. 949. Request for a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustrnent between four parcels of land located along Storm Hill Lane, Rolling Hills, CA, and having Assessors Parcel Numbers (APN) 7570-024-014, 7570-024-015, 7570-024-016 and 7570-024- 017 created by Parcel Map No. 26356. One parcel is developed, (4 Storm Hill Lane) and 3 parcels are vacant. (Storm Properties) Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Planning Director Schwartz stated this is a request for a Lot Line Adjustment between four parcels of land located on Storm Hill Lane, which were created by a subdivision, Parcel Map No. 26356. She indicated that no new lots are being created and no new development is being proposed with this application. She indicated that under a different Zoning Case, Zoning Case No. 950, a Site Plan Review is also requested for grading tfl construct a private road to serve these parcels. She reviewed the lot design standards and discussed the Fire Department's road requirements. She indicated that the Rolling Hills Community Association will also review the Lot Line Adjustment. She reviewed the applicant's justification for their request. Planning Director Schwartz indicated that no public comments were received from the surrounding residents. Planning Director Schwartz stated the project is considered a minor lot line adjustment that will not result in the creation of new parcels and qualifies as an exemption from CEQA review. By PC consensus,this project was discussed concurrently with Zoning Case No. 950. ZONING CASE NO. 950. Request for a Site Plan Review for grading and to construct a road to access 3 vacant parcels off of Storm Hill Lane, described in Zoning Case No. 949. The construction of the road was a condition of approval of a subdivision. Other than the private road, no new development is proposed with this application. (Storm Properties). An environmental review pursuant to CEQA was conducted during the subdivision process in 2000 and a Mitigated Negative Declaration(MND) was adopted by the City Council. The findings and conclusions of the MND are still relevant, applicable and in full force and effect for this project. By PC consensus, this project was discussed concurrently with Zoning Case No. 949. Chairtnan Chelf introduced the item and asked for staf�s comments. Planning Directar Schwartz stated that the request was for a Site Plan Review for grading and construction of a private road with infrastructures. She stated that construction of the improvements was a requirement of a subdivision application, known as Storm Hill Lane, which was completed and recorded in 2005. She stated that prior to finaling the Parcel Map in 2005, instead of constructing the improvements, the applicants opted to deposit construction bonds with the City in the amount that it would cost to design and construct these improvements. Planning Director Schwaxtz stated that concurrently, in Zoning Case No. 949,the applicant requests a Lot Line Adjustment between the four parcels of land, which were created by the subdivision. She indicated that other than the road, no new development is being proposed with this application. Planning Director Schwartz indicated that an environmental assessment would be conducted for the project due to new regulations. Planning Director Schwartz stated that several public comments were received from surrounding residents inquiring about the plans for the road. She stated that one resident expressed concern with the road being in his view due to his property backing up to the area of the lot opposite the road and requested that the road be screened. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's statement of justification. In response to Commissioner Cardenas' question, Planning Director Schwartz stated that the building pads are not being moved and a driveway to the rear lot would be constructed in the future. Chairman Chelf opened the public hearing. Jay Ahluwalia, Storm Properties Representative, commented that the previously designed and approved road is long and that the applicant is trying to bring the lot to the road by building a shorter road. He stated that the applicant is trying to minimize the disturbance to the lots. Chairman Chelf closed the public hearing. Minutes Planning Commission Meeting io-23-is 4 of 6 Following public comment and discussion, the PC, by consensus, scheduled a site visit to the properties for Zoning Cases Nos. 949 and 950 located along Storm Hill Lane(Cooley and Kirkpatrick absent). ZONING CASE NO. 952. Request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new 660 square foot detached garage and a Variance to encroach up to 12'2" into the required rear yard setback with a new 308 square foot addition and up to 3' with the detached garage. The subject property is located at 2 Chuckwagon Road (Lot 38-A/39-B-EF) Rolling Hills, CA, (Galvin/Kirmse). Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Planning Director Schwartz stated that the request is for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new 660 square foot detached garage and Variance to encroach up to 12'2" into the required rear yard setback with a new addition and up 3' with the detached garage. She reviewed the property lines and stated that this is a unique lot that fronts on two streets and the areas adjacent to Chuckwagon Road are steep. She stated that the location of the house prevents any house additions without requiring a Variance. She stated that the applicant and staff explored the possibility of changing the address to Eastfield Drive, since the entrance to the house and the driveway are off of Eastfield Drive; but that there are no feasible addresses left on Eastfield Drive to assign to this property. She indicated that no public comments were received from the surrounding residents. Planning Director Schwartz stated that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA. In response to Commissioner Seaburn's question, Planning Director Schwartz stated that the property address would remain 2 Chuckwagon Road. Discussion followed concerning the setback configuration of the property. Chairxnan Chelf opened the public hearing. Michael Song, Architect, EZ Plans, Inc., commented that the request is for a sma11 addition. Chairman Chelf closed the public hearing. Following public comment and discussion, the PC, by consensus, scheduled a site visit to the property at 2 Chuckwagon Road(Cooley and Kirkpatrick absent). ZONING CASE NO. 948. Request for Variances to construct a new 200 square foot parking pad, which would encroach into the allowable frontage; a 209 square foot garage addition, which would encroach into the front yard setback and a service yard that would encroach into the side yard setback. The subject property is located at 15 Georgeff Road (Lot 29-GF) Rolling Hills, CA, (Hatch). Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff s comments. Senior Planner Stewart stated that the applicant is proposing to enlarge a garage, modify a driveway to accommodate a new parking pad, relocate the trash area, and modify the walkway at the property.located at 15 Georgeff Road. She stated that the improvements and new trash area require Variances due to location in the front setback. She stated that the paxking pad is less than 30' from the roadway easement. She noted that staff is recommending a special condition of approval be added to the project, if approved, requiring that no storage of recreational vehicles be allowed. Senior Planner Stewart stated that no public comments were received from the surrounding residents. She indicated that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA. Chairman Chelf opened the public hearing. Deborah Richie-Bray, Architect, Richie-Bray Architects, commented that parking is needed to accommodate the number and size of the vehicles of the property owner. Ms. Richie-Bray stated that the current configuration of the parking pad and garage does not a11ow for a laxge size vehicle to fit in the garage. Chairman Chelf closed the public hearing. Chairman Chelf commented that a topography map would be helpful as a reference at the next meeting. Commissioner Cardenas requested that a sample of the type of permeable surface to be used for the driveway be provided at the site visit. Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 10-23-18 5 of 6 Following staff's presentation and public comment, the PC, by consensus, scheduled a site visit to the property at 15 Georgeff Road (Cooley and Kirkpatrick absent). OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS None. SCHEDULE OF FIELD TRIPS f December 18, 201 g) Following discussion among the PC and staff, the PC scheduled a field trip to the following properties on December 12, 201 S beginning at 7:30 a.m.: Storm Hill Lane 2 Chuckwagon 15 Georgeff ITEMS FROM STAFF A. CONFIRMATION OF PC AVAILABILITY ON DEC 18Tx It was conf'irmed that the next PC meeting should be on December 12, 2018 at 7:30 a.m. Senior Planner Stewart discussed the City's new policy requiring applicants to certify staking and silhouettes. Discussion ensued among staff and the PC concerning the City's policy not to recommend vendors, certification process and guidelines for certification for silhouettes. Commissioner Cardenas recommended that the silhouette certification process be simplified as much as possible. ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION None. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further business before the Planning Commission, Chairman Chelf adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. to an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled to be held on Wednesday, December 12, 2018 beginning at 7:30 am. for the purpose of conducting site visits to Storm Hill Lane, 2 Chuckwagon Road and 15 Georgeff Road. The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, December 12, 2018 beginning at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber,Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. Respectfully submitted, ��� Yve�t'e Hall City Clerk Approved �.l ,;� , r�•. � � � �._............... Br�ci (`l�elf [t7i airman � Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 10-23-18 6 of 6