3/8/1976MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY, COUNCIL
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
March 8, 1976
A regular meeting of the City Council was called to order by
Mayor Heinsheimer at 7:30 P.M .'Mo'day- March-8,;197fi, at the Adminis-
tration. Building; 2 Portuguese Bend Road;' Rglling- Hills; California.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
ALSO PRESENT:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Councilmen Crocker, Pernell, Rose, Mayor Heinsheimer
None
Teena Clifton
William Kinley
Douglas Rogers
June Cunningham
Mr. Gordon Smith
Mr. John Sonneborn
Mr. William Smith
Mr. Burke Belknap
Mr. Peter Felner
Miss Cindy Weber
Dr. & Mrs. N. Braemer
Mr. & Mrs. G. Epstein
Mrs. Kip Goldreyer
Mr -s. Lorraine Hansen
Mrs. Suzane Hines
Mrs. Arlene Lawler
Mr. Roger Meurer
Dr. Ken Miller
Dr. Paul Rubenstein
Mrs. Joan Saffo
Mrs. Marcia Schoettle
Mrs. Susan Schroeder
Mr. Roy Sinclair
Mr. John Stern
Mrs.'Gordana Swanson
Mr. William Stringfellow
Mrs. Lee Taylor
Dr. & Mrs. Barry Tischler
Mrs. Shirley Tyndall
Mr. & Mrs. Roy Vachon
Mrs. Pearl Willburn
5
City Manager
City Attorney
City Treasurer
Secretary
Pacific Telephone
Pacific Telephone
Contractor
Rancho Palos Verdes
Guest
Guest
Residents
is
it
is
A motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of February 23,
197.6 as presented was made by Councilman Crocker, -seconded by Council-
mari-_Pernell and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Crocker,.Pernell, Mayor Heinsheimer
ABSTAINED: Councilman Rose
FINANCIAL STATEMENT, JANUARY 1976, 7
The City Treasurer reported that Budget figures in the January
Financial Statement had been corrected, and the report as revised was
ready for review.
74
March 8, 1976
A motion to approve the Financial Statement as corrected was made.
by Councilman Crocker, seconded by Councilman Pernell and carried by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Crocker, Pernell, Rose
Mayor Heinsheimer
CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIE& ASSOCIATIQN~�.„
Correspondence from California Contract Cities Association'on
Revenue Sharing was received and filed.
SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM 16
In a letter dated March 2, 1976, Mrs. Arlene Lawler, 15 Middle -
ridge Lane North, advised the Council that she wished to suggest a self-
supporting Summer Youth Program, and requested that the Council appoint
her chairperson of an ad hoc committee to investigate the feasibility
of such a project. Mrs. Lawler appeared at the meeting and asked the
sanction of the Council to proceed with the program.
Councilman Crocker suggested that Mrs. Lawler check with existing
groups such as tennis club, Caballeros, Scouts and other Peninsula ac-
tivities to eliminate the possibility of duplicating or overlapping
existing groups. Further, he asked that information be submitted in
time for budget consideration.
Mrs. Lawler said it is her, hope that such a group would be self-
supporting, and would be an asset to the community rather than a burden.
She said she plans to contact Mrs. Carole Hoffman and ask her assistance
in formulating the program.
Councilman Rose suggested that Mrs. Lawler's request be sanctioned,
and that she be authorized to proceed with gathering information. Mayor
Heinsheimer asked Mrs. Lawler to report to the Council when she has a
plan to present.
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 45
Councilman Rose reported that he had received a Legislative Bulletin
from the League of California Cities regarding the Proposed Court Reorgan-
ization under SB 1500. Under provisions of the Bill, Rolling Hills could
lose approximately $5,600 annually in fines and forfeitures. The City
Attorney recommended.that if opposed, the City Council take immediate
action on that portion of the Bill.
RESOLUTION NO. 357 85
Councilman Rose moved that Resolution No. 357 entitled A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS OPPOSING THE ENACTMENT
OF SENATE BILL 1500 be adopted, and that reading in full be waived, and
that copies of the resolution be forwarded to the Governor of the State
of California, to Senator Robert Stevens and to Assemblyman Robert
Beverly. The motion was seconded by Councilman Crocker and carried by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Crocker, Pernell, Rose
Mayor Heinsheimer
PAYMENT OF BILLS 92
Councilman Crocker moved that Demands No. 5168 through 5205, with
the exception of No. 5204 which was voided, be approved for payment in
the amount of $8,527.05 from the General Fund. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Pernell and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Crocker, Pernell, Rose, Mayor Heinsheimer
-2-
March 8, 1976
TRAFFIC AND SPEED CONTROL 96
Mayor Heinsheimer announced that for purposes of discussion,
agenda items 8 b), Traffic and Speeding Problems in Rolling Hills,
and 13, Traffic Control on Eastfield Drive; would be combined.
Councilman Crocker reported that in an effort to improve safety
on Eastfield Drive, the following measures will be taken: 1) a rumble
strip will be installed on Eastfield Drive to determine what effect,
if any, such installation has on speed and compliance with existing
speed limits; 2) additional delineators will be installed along the
center line in an effort to discourage cars from crossing over the
line; 3) the Council would consider amending the ordinance so that
all posted speed limits would be absolute, rather than advisory, and
a violation of posted limits could be enforced through the courts.
Mrs. Clifton reported that additional delineators would be
installed on all major curves on Eastfield Drive on Tuesday, March 9,
and a double rumble strip would be installed on the downhill side of
Eastfield Drive just above the curve in the vicinity of the Miller
and Schoettle residences. The strip installation will be temporary,
held in place by mastic rather then epoxy, for a period long enough
for the evaluation to be made -with regard to impact on speeding and
noise problems and/or vibration in the area, the Manager said.
Mrs. Pearl Willburn, 60 Eastfield Drive, reported that she had
contacted Mr. Tom Brohard in the Los Angeles County Road Department,
and when she questioned him, he said that dots used in the rumble
strips are slippery when wet. Mrs. Willburn asked whether children
on bicycles and equestrians had been considered. Councilman Crocker
said the installation would be on a straight section of the road, not
on a curve, and could be negotiated by persons on horseback or bicycles.
Further, he said those persons are presently in jeopardy from speeders.
Mrs. Lorraine Hansen, 11 Eastfield Drive, said if the strip is
installed on one side only, she was concerned about drivers who might
swerve to avoid it, increasing the danger of head-on collision. Coun-
cilman Crocker explained that the purpose of the strip of dots is to
alert drivers to the hazard, but they do not prevent speeding; it is
possible to drive over the strip at high speed without swerving to
avoid it'.
Councilman Rose said occasional drivers in a hazardous area tend
to be cautious, and most -of the speeders are residents. He urged con-
tinual law enforcement in the area. Mrs. Clifton reported that Judge
Mark Wood of South Bay Municipal Court, had toured Rolling Hills with
the administrative lieutenant and traffic sergeant of the Sheriff's
Department, and they had agreed that many of the roads are hazardous
and traffic laws should be enforced.
Mrs. Shirley Tyndall, 65 Eastfield Drive, asked whether anyone
had checked with cities where rumble strips are installed. She said
it was her understanding that the City of La Mirada had installed
rumble strips with undesireable results, and she urged continued
„enforcement of speed laws by the Sheriff. Mrs. Lee Taylor, 46 East-
field Drive, said she is opposed to rumble strips, and considers it
the responsibility of parents to watch their children. She said she
had discussed the matter with many of -her neighbors, and all were
opposed to the planned installation. Mrs. Marcia Schoettle, 24 East-
field Drive, said she is concerned about noise and vibration, 'since._
the installation will be near her home, but she is willing to have
the City try them. She said that since the Sheriff's car has been
effective, she would recommend that such enforcement continue if
possible. Mrs, Hansen agreed that the visible sheriff's car has
been the most effective method of enforcing the speed laws.
-3-
March 8, 1976
Councilman Crocker explained that although the problem is
severe on Eastfield Drive, it is impractical to expect to have
constant enforcement in that area only, since there are problems in
other sections of the City as well. He explained that the committee
had considered speed bumps and rejected them as not acceptable to
the community; however, they are continuing to attempt to find a
way to supplement presence of a black and white car.
Councilman Pernell asked how the committee intends to determine
whether the strips are effective, and Councilman Crocker said by
residence response to the efforts of the committee and their reaction
to the rumble strips. Councilman Pernell suggested that report sheets
be distributed to residents for observation and comments, and he said
the committee would need input in order to judge the success of their
efforts. Mrs. Gordana Swanson said the observations should be made
by non -biased persons who have no emotional involvement in the project.
She suggested members.of the City and Association maintenance and
security staff; Mrs. Saffo said they are too busy to take part.
Mr. Roger Meurer, 9 Blackwater Canyon Road, asked whether in-
creased law enforcement could pay for itself from fines and forfeitures
levied on violators. Mayor Heinsheimer said that although increased
enforcement would not be self supporting, it should be considered,
and Councilman Crocker said that if deemed necessary, certain budget
allocations could be eliminated and the money diverted into increased
enforcement. Mrs. Lucille Epstein, 4 E1 Concho, said speed control
is needed on Portuguese Bend Road and Crest Road, in addition to
Eastfield.
Following the discussion Councilman Crocker moved that the
Council proceed with the three methods of speed control he had out-
lined. The motion was seconded by Councilman Pernell with the pro-
viso that a written evaluation of the experiment be submitted to the
Council by the committee studying the problem, and the motion was
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Crocker, Pernell, Rose
Mayor Heinsheimer
The Mayor asked that all input be submitted by March 18 for
the March 22 meeting of the Council. Dr. Miller said he would be out
of town, and Mayor Heinsheimer asked him to arrange with other members
of the committee to have the evaluations presented to the Council as
requested.
The City Attorney advised the Council that he would contact
the City of La Mirada to ask about their experience with rumble
strips. Further, Mr. Kinley recommended that the traffic ordinance
be amended with regard to the prima facie speed, and recommended
that all speeds in Rolling Hills be absolute. Mr. Kinley said he
would prepare an ordinance for consideration at the next meeting,
changing all advisory speeds to absolute speed limits.
PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED EXPANSION OF CRENSHAW GATE AREA 435
Mayor Heinsheimer opened a public hearing on a proposal to
expand the Crenshaw Gate area by adding an additional lane for in-
bound traffic on Crest Road West, and he read into the record a
letter dated March 4, 1976 from Jack Davidson, President of the
Board of Directors of the Rolling Hills Community Association. Mr.
Davidson enclosed copies of the minutes of the Board meetings and
correspondence on the subject so the Council would be aware of the
background upon which the Board made its decision and commitment to
the Women's Club, and he stated that at the Annual Meeting of the
Community Association it seemed that there was considerably more
-4-
77
March 8, 1,976
opposition than had come forth in several meetings of the Association
Board where the matter was discussed.
The Mayor explained that the Women's Community Club had requested
that an additional in -bound traffic lane.be added, and had offered
$4,, 0-00 ,to the Board towards the project. At the same time, the City
Council initiated procee,d�,tig6 to annex a porti6n of .ands f1tom ancho
Pslbs Verde's Then .t wes discovered that t '' ,;Crei n' awuidQ t� ib se. was
located outside the boundaries of Rolling Mills. Ait' hong. worked ori
concurrently, the Mayor said the projects were independentof each
other, and in annexing the land to clear up a technicality, the City
Council did not imply approval of the Board's plan to expand the gate
area..
A rendering of the gate area prepared by Mr. William Field,
4 Ranchero Road, was displayed. Mr. George Epstein, vice president
of .the Board of Directors, said the matter had become a total com-
munity concern, and he suggested that the total community be polled
so that all sides of the picture could be considered. Mayor Heins-
CY: heimer said he considered the decision the responsibility of the
elected officials, who should hold public hearings, .gather as much
information as possible, then arrive at a decision which reflects
the wishes of the people. Mr. Epstein said the Board had acted in
that manner last May when they moved to accept the money from the
Women's Community Club, as evidence presented to the Board indicated
that an attempt had been made to poll residents using the gate, and
of those who responded, the majority had been in favor of expansion
for increased security and safety. Further, he said it is the Board's
intention to make the improvement low-keyed, and the concept would
have to be approved by the Environmental Quality Board and the Land-
scape Committee. Councilman Crocker said the Board has voted, based
on evidence presented at their meetings, and after this.hearing'_the
Council should be able to act in a manner which would represent the
current feelings of the community.
Mr. Burke Belknap, 28866 Crestridge Road, Ranch Palos Verdes,
said that although he does not reside in Rolling Hills, his property
has pedestrian and equestrian access to Crest Road in the Crenshaw
Gate area, and he asked that the access be preserved. Further, he
said he occasionally uses the area for supplemental guest parking,
and he would wish to continue to do so.
Mr. John Stern, 29 Crest Road East, said he wished to oppose
the proposed expansion for three reasons: 1) fiscal; it was his
opinion that the money presented to the Board by the Women's Commun-
ity Club could be used to advantage for recreational purposes, in-
creased security or other purposes; 2) the quality of life in Rolling
Hills, and 3) security. Mr. Stern said that the General Plan of
Rancho Palos Verdes, since revised, originally showed Crest Road as
a through road. He said he and his family use Crest Road and the
-Crenshaw Gate and are not inconvenienced by the slight delay at
certain times. He asked that the plan to expand the gate area be
delayed at least until the report of the Coastal Commission has been
resolved by the State Legislature at the end of the year. Mr. Stern
agreed with Mr. Davidson and Mr. Epstein that that the total commun-
ity should be polled.
Mrs. Arlene Lawler, vice president of the Women's Club, said
she questioned the propriety of the Council's considering a matter
under the Board's jurisdiction. She said the money was given with
strings attached for improvement of the gate area, and with a promise
of assistance with the landscaping. Although the residents- were not
consulted on the addition of a third lane at the Main and Eastfield
Gates, Mrs. Lawler said she would support the recommendation that
the community be polled.
-5-
March 8, 1976
Mayor Heinsheimer explained that under terms of the agreement
for gate services, the City contributes to the operation of the gates,
and must be consulted before any improvement can be made to any gate
areae -`-The' Eastfield and `Main Gates had. -to be expanded because any.
back up'16f"traffic extended -'to` -,a main thoroughfare and was hazardous,
he expa2ned; but-`'thi's;is-`-not the case' at the Crenshaw. Gate.
a . p`s eiii skedi�thd�'Ciiy A-ttorney`�to rule : on c4hieh `group has--if-z'
jurisdiction'""over'`'tti6 'elecisIon,; since the 'Board' of -'Directors., of the
Community` Associ`a,ftb i;',which"` cbntribute�s 75% to, tho' support of the
gate system, 'ha'V&` de a'deci'si6n 'andhas asked the .concurrence of the
City Council, which contributes 25%. Mr, Kinley explained that ingress
and egress over Crest Road is the responsibility of the Association,
and traffic safety is the responsibility of the City.
Councilman Rose said he would want the Board to explore the
wishes of the community before voting on the matter, and he suggested
that the matter be tabled until the Board explores the community's
position. Mr. Stringfellow said the minutes of meetings show that
the Council was aware of the Board's plans, and there was no feedback
from the Council to the Board, either in favor of or opposed to the
proposed lane addition.
Mr. Roger Meurer, 9 Blackwater Canyon Road, said he is in favor
of a third-alne; since he uses the Crenshaw Gate,and for selfish
reasons;would find an additional lane an advantage. Mr. Meurer said
he had participated in the poll conducted by the Women's Club, and
he asked the results, which were 100 residents in favor of the ex-
pansion and 56 residents opposed.
Councilman Pernell said he would oppose the expansion unless a
positive effect on safety and sec-rity could be demonstrated. It is
his opinion that a`maximum of two minutes could be saved at peak
hours, and opening Crest Road as a through road at some future date
would spoil Rolling Hills. He said he has not heard any testimony
which would constitute a compelling reason for considering expan
sion or addition of another lane,
Mrs. Kip Goldreyer, 3 Quail Ridge Road, said legal placement
of stickers constitutes a major security flaw, as they cannot be
clearly seen at the Crenshaw Gate, and many cars are admitted without
proper stickers.
Mrs. Joan Saffo, 1 Crest Road East, said she has been a
resident of Rolling Hills for 26 years, and wishes to have her home
available for Peninsula residents who wish to use it for group
functions. She urged the Council not to isolate Rolling Hills from
the rest of the Peninsula; she said she liked the charm and atmos-
phere of the original city buildings, and wished to halt progress
and construction. Mrs. Saffo said she went with the Landscape Commit-
tee to view the site of the proposed expansion of the gate area.
Further, Mrs, Saffo said that as a,member.of the Board of Directors
she had reluctantly voted for the third lane, as it appeared that
as a result of the poll taken by the Women's Club, it was the wish
of the community.
Councilman Rose suggested that the matter be tabled until
additional information or results of a poll of residents are presen-
ted to the Council by the Board. Mr. Stringfellow said the Board
frequently reconsiders its actions, and suggested that a joint
Board of Directors%City Council meeting be scheduled in the near
future for further consideration of the matter,
Mayor Heinsheimer asked members of the Council to comment on
the matter. Councilman Pernell said both the Council and Board
March 8, 1976
should consider addition of a third lane in the light of what it
would do for the community, and if it is considered necessary for
safety and security, supporting testimony should be submitted to the
Council for review. Councilman Rose said he is concerned about any
improvement of Crest Road. He recommended that alternatives be con-
sidered, including the possibility of requiring that.all non-resident
traffic use the Main Gate and Eastfield Gate, which already have two
in -bound lanes. Councilman Crocker agreed that testimony on safety
and security as reasons for improving the gate should be substantiated,
and he stated for the record that he would not recommend a poll of the.
residents, but favored that the decision be made by elected officials.
If a poll is taken, Councilman Crocker said the jurisdictional question
should be fully explained, and the decision should be based on what
the majority wishes, after all have had an opportunity to vote. Mayor
Heinsheimer urged caution in considering expansion of the existing
gate. In his eight year residence the Mayor said he has not observed
any severe problems, but could envision severe problems which might
Q) result from expansion of the gate. After polling the Council, the
Mayor said he wished to return the matter to the Board for further
consideration.
D
Following the discussion Mr. Epstein said he wished to go on
record as a private citizen by stating that he is unalterably opposed
to a third lane at the Crenshaw Gate. None of the information pre-
sented at any of the Board meetings constituted a compelling reason
for the need to expand, Mr. Epstein said, and he agreed with Council-
man Pernell that sufficient reason had not been demonstrated to
support the decision to add another inbound lane, since the gates
provide traffic control, not security. Mr. Stringfellow said he does
not want another lane, but voted 'for it as a member of the Board be-
cause he thought evidence presented indicated that the Community
wanted another lane. Mrs. Saffo and Mr. Stern said they wished to
go on record against the suggestion that non-resident traffic be re-
routed to the Main Gate. They wish to have their guests reach them
by the most direct route, which is through the Crenshaw Gate..
The Mayor thereafter closed the Public Hearing, and ordered
the matter held for presentation of additional information by the
Board of Directors.
RECESS 949
The meeting was recessed at 10:20 P.M. and reconvened at 10:30.
FINAL MAP, TRACT 31873, GEORGE SCHARFFENBERGER 944
The Manager advised that the engineer had requested that the
matter be held for the next regular meeting of the Council. The
Mayor so ordered.
ROAD PLAN, TRACT 29383, CLIFTON HIX 962
Copies of correspondence dated March 8, 1976 from R. A. Meurer,
Consulting Engineer, were presented to the Council.
Mrs. Clifton explained that as a condition of approval of the
tentative map for Tract 29383, the owners of lots 4 -BW, 5 -BW and
6 -BW were required to sign the road grading plan. Mr. Charles
Rutherford, owner of Lot 4, and Dr. Kenneth Lewin, owner of Lot 5
signed the plan, but Dr. Barry Tischler, owner of Lot 6 had declined
to sign because of the impact of the road improvement on his property.
Two sketches of the Tischler property showing proposedapproaches
from the road to the driveway were presented to the Council. Mrs.
Clifton explained that Dr. Tischler wishes to use the design prepared
by Mr. Bob Knox of Henderson and Knox, architects who designed the
-7-
So
March 8, 1976
Tischler residence. The cost of the design submitted by Mr. Knox
is $1,397.13. Mr. Hix wishes Dr. Tischler to accept the design pre-
pared by his engineer, Mr. Meurer, which would cost $505.73.
Mr. Meurer advised the Council that Dr. Tischler wishes to have
drainage problems which have existed since his home was constructed
reconciled; the subdivider feels that it is not his obligation to
remedy problems which were'not�caused by the -subdivision, and wishes
to limit his obligation to the roadway to avoid responsibility for
future drainage problems on the Tischler property which may remain in
spite of efforts to eliminate them.
Mayor Heinsheimer said that in requiring signatures of the
property owners the Council had indicated a wish to protect owners
in the area of the subdivision. However, he said he did not consider
it within the Council's jurisdiction to enter into or attempt to
mediate the agreement between any owner and the subdivider. Mrs.
Clifton said that the owners are close to an agreement, and Dr.
Tischler agreed.
Concerning the requirement for a graded emergency road from the
cul de sac at the end of the extension of Buggy Whip Road to the
Scharffenberger property, Mr. Meurer stated that because of existing
geology problems, hp wish..Ps to grade an emergency access road to a
width of 15 feet. Conditions of approval require grading to the
satisfaction of the staff, and although not specifically stated in
the minutes, the Manager has required that the grading be done to
the full width of a standard road. Mrs. Clifton said she and Mr.
Meurer had listened to the tape of the meetings and had determined
that the requirement, of the Planning Commission, approved by the
City Council, was that grading be done to the satisfaction of th-
staff. There is a 60' road easement, Mrs. Clifton said, and she
advised the engineer that she required grading of the dirt for thg-
full roadway width required by the subdivision ordinance, which
is 24'. In discussing the matter the Council agreed that the fire
road should be improved as little as possible, and should be graded
sufficiently to handle emergency vehicles only. Mrs. Clifton said
the emergency access would be 15' wide and 300' long.
TRACT 30345, DR. JERRY GREENHUT 1130
Mr. Meurer asked for clarification of a requirement on the
Greenhut subdivision, 13 Blackwater Canyon Road. Mr. Meurer said
requirements for improvement of Appaloosa Lane had been waived
when the subdivision was redesigned, since access to the lots will
be provided from Blackwater Canyon Road. Mr. Meurer asked that the
requirement for a new hydrant on Appaloosa Lane also be waived, and
placement of a hydrant on Blackwater Canyon Road to serve the two
new residences be approved.
Councilman Pernell said any changes in requirements are pro-
perly handled by the Planning Commission and approved by the Council;
he did not consider it within the jurisdiction of the Council to
amend any requirements, even to eliminate ambiguities, as Mr. Meurer
requested. Mayor Heinsheimer suggested that Mr. Meurer make his
request of the Planning Commission.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 1170
The Manager reported that the Public Utilities Commission had
advised her that hearings have not yet been scheduled on California
Water Company's application for a rate increase.
we
March 8, 1976
SUNSET COAST LINE 1180
Mrs. Clifton reported that Supervisor Baxter Ward's office had
contacted her and offered to have a member of his staff appear before
the Council to provide additional information on Supervisor Ward's
transportation proposal, the Sunset Coast Line. Further, they have
requested a resolution of support for the plan to put the measure on
the ballot.
Following discussion, Mayor Heinsheimer asked the Manager to
advise the Board of Supervisors that the information has been presented
to the Council, and that an appearance by a staff member is not desired
at this time.
CORRESPONDENCE RE: SPEED, P. M. BATTAGLIA 1200
The Mayor ordered a letter dated February 23, 1976 from Mr.
G') Philip M. Battaglia, 63 Crest Road East, received and filed.
PALOS VERDES PENINSULA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1225
A letter from Mrs. Pat Wright, Principal of La Cresta School,
was presented to the Council. Mrs. Wright enclosed a list of habitual
offenders, dogs who repreatedly stay on the school ground, and the
names and addresses of their owners. A copy of the School District's
policy was also included.
The Manager was directed to write to residents whose names
appeared on the list and ask their cooperatiDn in keeping their dogs
away from the school grounds, with copies of the letters to the De-
partment of Animal Control and to Mrs. Wright. Further, she was
asked to advise residents in the Newsletter that she had been contacted
on the matter by the school principal, and that offending dogs will be
picked up by the Animal Control Department.
ANIMAL CONTROL AGREEMENT
Mrs. Clifton reported that she had met again with the managers
of three other contract cities in the area to discuss animal control,
and another meeting would be held on Thursday, March 11. Their"pro-
posal for a contract with the County is nearly ready for presentation
to the political bodies, and Mrs. Clifton said she will wish to discuss
the matter with the Council soon. Many cities.are planning to assume
pound activities, and Mrs. Clifton said the recommendation of the four
local cities will probably be to stay with the County Department of
Animal Control for most,services for at least another year, with the
licensing handled by the cities.
Councilman Pernell asked the Manager to attempt to determine,
in her discussions with the other cities, how soon the local cities
can hope to provide their own animal control services. Mrs. Clifton
said the City 'can terminate services with the County on 60 days notice,
and the managers have been discussing a joint four -city jurisdictional
service, with different services being provided by each city for each
of the other participating cities.
MATTERS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY
Mr. Kinley reported that the Coastal Commission has -,filed their
report and he has requested a copy. He will report to the Council on
it after he had received and reviewed the Act,
PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX 1418
The City Attorney recommended that the Council consider adopting
March 8, 1976
a real estate transfer tax of 1% of the sales price. The City presently
receives a portion of the County transfer tax.
The Mayor requested that supporting information on the recommend-
ation be presented to the Council for further discussion.
MATTERS FROM THE COUNCIL
OPEN AGENDA
1550
Councilman Pernell said he wished to propose that the Council
devote a part of each Council meeting to a "Town Hall" type meeting
at which residents could address the Council on non -agenda items.
He proposed that a specified time be set aside, and that remarks by
residents be limited to five minutes for each resident.
In discussing the matter members of theCouncil said they wished
to follow the established agenda form, with other items to be heard
under the portion reserved for residents who wish to speak. The Mayor
ordered the matter held for additional discussion at the next meeting.
SAFETY AND SECURITY AT THE GATES
1568
Councilman Crocker said one of the reasons given for the need
to expand the Crenshaw Gate was safety and security. He asked that
evidence of the need and some of the problems encountered be presented
to the Council as a basis for consideration if the matter comes before
the Council again.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE
ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE 1525
Mrs. Gordana Swanson asked whether the fee schedule had been
adopted as part of the Animal Control Ordinance.
Mayor Heinsheimer said a pro forma schedule was adopted with the
ordinance, which is now in effect, and the fees can be changed at any
time the Council wishes. The Mayor said the Public Hearing on the
reserved sections of the Ordinance will be held on Monday, March 222
ADJOURNMENT 1604
There being no further business to come before the Council, the
meeting was adjourned at 10:50 P.M. to meet at 7230 P.M. Tuesday
March 9, 1976, for the purpose of canvassing the election of March 2
and seating the new Council.
APPROVED:
--I-A
Mayor
-i0-
" City r k -
LJ